It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If you are just a character, then thank you for keeping this thread alive, and providing us an example of the ignorant statements and cemented ideas, of many of the medical profession, including the newly initiated students.
Originally posted by bsl4doc
Applause?????
I'm certainly not saying I'm absolutely right, or that their applause warrants that.
Originally posted by bsl4doc
That's why I didn't answer your questiong and why you got the response you did, Riley. You took my sarcastic remark to another user somehow as an insult, and then make baseless accusations towards me and generalize me as "an italian". So, no. I don't regret what I said.
~MFP
On a side note, my g/f wants to get my youngest tested also.. I already know the answer but we will see where it goes from there.
since the metal molecules can stick to the inside of cells and not show up in urine or blood. Liver and Colon biopsy testing for heavy metals would be one way to measure levels of metals stuck-in-cells, yet Docs are hesitant to do invasive tests after seeing no metal in urine. It is well understood that heavy metals can definitely cause fatigue by binding to the internal biochemistry and inactivating internal processes.
Urine- A urine test is the best test to evaluate ongoing exposure to mercury, such as exposure at work. This is not the right test for mercury from fish. If urine results are elevated, there is an exposure source which is not fish. Results greater than 20 micrograms per liter (20 ug/L) may indicate a hazardous level of mercury in the body.
Blood- A blood test measures recent exposure to all types of mercury, including mercury from fish. Results greater than 2.8 micrograms per deciliter (2.8 ug/dL) may indicate a hazardous level of mercury in the body
Urine and Blood -If you want to evaluate other sources of mercury exposure in addition to exposure from fish, both a urine and a blood test should be performed at the same time. If the blood test is elevated and the urine test (taken at the same time) is normal, fish ingestion is probably the source of mercury exposure. If both tests are elevated, exposure is coming from some exposure source besides fish.
Hair- This test is not recommended except in unusual cases to test a mother's hair to estimate her child's exposure before birth.
The symptoms of autism and the symptoms of mercury poisoning are identical.
Autism epidemics have begun in other countries and the timing of those epidemics parallel the introduction of universal vaccination programs with Thimerosal-containing vaccines.
Originally posted by conspiracy_101
Riley
I was wondering how (urine, blood, hair, etc..) the doctor was performing your tests, specifically the mercury test. And if you just went to your regular doctor or a specialist?
Riley, do you have any difficulty in sleeping or with your sleep patterns. I know my son's sleep patterns are continously cycling around (in constant change). He has been know to stay up for very long periods of time. No matter what (we even tried medication for awhile) and he was not affected by it. Just wondering if this could be a factor in mercury poisoning.
www.idph.state.il.us...
Chronic exposure to lower levels of mercury vapor causes effects to the central nervous system. Symptoms of chronic poisoning vary, but may include tremors, psychological changes, insomnia, loss of appetite, irritability, headache and short-term memory loss.
Direct contact with the skin can lead to dermatitis. A rare syndrome called acrodynia, or “pink’s disease,” can occur in children exposed to mercury vapor. Its symptoms include severe leg cramps, irritability and painful pink fingers with peeling hands. Few children exposed to mercury develop acrodynia.
Originally posted by NJE777
Oh I didn't know Moderators applauded? Best Freudian slip I have seen for a while! applause...?????
Originally posted by KDX175DUEX
Ok bsl4doc -
I opened my arguement with a 1991 Thimerosal MSDS direct from the manufacturer.
Thimerosal Material Safety Data Sheet 1991
Which states that Mental Retardation could be a side effect.
You enter the debate with this stance:
bsl4doc -Also, if 3-6 in 1,000 children having autism is too high a rate of side effects for you, perhaps you should consider the other 994 children who won't contract measles, mumps, rubella, diptheria, etc. .
And later you responded with this:
bsl4doc - I don't see why you and a few other people think it's okay for a pandemic of measles, mumps, and rubella to occur just to prevent 3 out of 1000 children from developing an autism spectrum disorder.
So at this point everyone in the thread thinks you are aware of the problem, and explain it as a necessary causualty of the vaccine age.
Basically saying that it is ok to make new diseases if you can fight other diseases.
Originally posted by Byrd
And finally -- let's tone down the combative tone, okay? We can discuss our views without getting snarky... right?
Originally posted by Byrd
* Before 1970, the number of shots that kids got was much higher than today (I don't think a year went by that my brother and I were not vaccinated for something or another. My dad, as a child, also had lots of vaccinations.)
Where are the huge numbers of autistic people that should have resulted from those vaccines?
VACCINE AVAILABILITY IN ONTARIO
1970 Live further attenuated measles vaccine was distributed through Medical Officers of Health. The rubella vaccine (live) HPV-77DE5 was also distributed through Medical Officers of Health. Rubella vaccine monovalent - HPV-77DE5 available.
1970 October. Killed measles vaccine was discontinued.
1972 Combined measles - rubella vaccine was distributed to physicians and Medical Officers of Health.
1974 Rubella vaccine HPV-77DE5 was distributed to physicians and Medical Officers of Health.
1975 Combined measles, mumps and rubella vaccine distributed to physicians and Medical Officers of Health. Referred to as MMRI - RI = HPV-77DE5.
1977 December 10. Measles-rubella vaccine discontinued.
1980 January. Rubella vaccine RA27/3 monovalent was introduced and replaced the HPV-77DE5.
1980 April 16. MMRII vaccine with RA27/3 component was introduced to replace the MMRI.
1981 Introduction of diploid cell rabies vaccine for all post-exposure treatment (HDCV).
1982 July. Immunization of School Pupils Act introduced.
1983 Hepatitis B vaccine distributed at cost to specific groups at risk. Discontinued in 1985.
1984 Introduction of absorbed vaccine. DPT Polio, Td Polio, Tetanus Polio and Tetanus.
There's no "new disease" being made here. Autism was around for a long time before vaccination and the kids usually died very early.
No, it's not an easy decision to make... until you've worked during an epidemic in the US (like the polio epidemic that I lived through in the 1950's) or worked in health care in countries where vaccines are not available. No treatment is 100% effective and 100% safe. Do you prefer to let babies and children die from things like pneumonia and diptheria (30% death rate)... things that we have vaccinations against... instead of vaccinating them?
Originally posted by bsl4doc
..
Wrong. Mercury poisoning is most often from methyl mercury. Thimerosal breaks down to ethyl mercury. [
bsl4doc
..
So really, the vaccines are not tainted or anything like that. For 98-99% of the population, they are fine. For those with this genetic mutation, they are not. The same goes for diet coke. Those with phenylalanine deficient pathways (called phenylketonurics), diet coke can be harmful. For the other 99% of the population, it's not.
..
www.generationrescue.org...
The mercury received in a vaccine is no greater than in a can of tuna. Eating a can of tuna has certainly never caused autism.
This myth has received a lot of publicity because it offers an analogy anyone can understand and makes the mercury-autism connection appear trivial.
We can start by comparing a 200-pound male adult consuming tuna with the infant who receives a single vaccine on their first day of birth (since day-old infants don't eat tuna). On the first day of birth an infant receives the Hep B vaccine with about 25 micrograms of ethlymercury - this does approximate the 30 micrograms of methlymercury in an average can of tuna. Since the average infant weighs about 7 pounds, the weight equivalent number of cans of tuna for an adult would be 28 cans. (The adult male weighs 28x more than the infant.)
If you take those 28 cans of tuna and distill it down to mercury content, you would have 840 micrograms of mercury (30 micrograms per can). Keep in mind that the stomach successfully absorbs and excretes about 90% of any mercury ingested through food, leaving only about 10% of the mercury to be absorbed into the bloodstream. Since the mercury in vaccines is injected directly into the bloodstream where 100% of it can be absorbed by the organs, you would need an additional 252 cans of tuna to get the equivalent amount of mercury into the bloodstream for a total of 280 cans of tuna and 8,400 micrograms of methlymercury.
Also, remember that a developing brain is far more sensitive to toxins than an adult brain. Current estimates say mercury is 5-10x more toxic for a developing brain. We'll use the low end of that range, so multiply the 280 cans of tuna by 5 and you get 1,400 cans of tuna.
So, receiving the Hep B vaccine with Thimerosal on the first day of birth is the equivalent of a 200-pound adult male consuming 1,400 cans of tuna in a single day. One final adjustment: the adult male in the analogy needs to have no capacity to excrete mercury. As Boyd Haley, Ph.D. notes, "it is very well known that infants do not produce significant levels of bile or have adult renal capacity for several months after birth. Bilary transport is the major biochemical route by which mercury is removed from the body, and infants cannot do this very well."
So, a 200-pound male who consumes 1,400 cans of tuna in a single day and has their ability to excrete mercury severely diminished is the same as a day-old infant receiving the Hep B vaccine. Now the analogy is fair.
So, a 200-pound male who consumes 1,400 cans of tuna in a single day and has their ability to excrete mercury severely diminished is the same as a day-old infant receiving the Hep B vaccine. Now the analogy is fair.