It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Saldorri
While I hate Paedophiles they are everywhere. I am a Satanist, and paedophilia is NOT part of my religion. I am sick of these paedos draging my religion through the dirt, but then again the Catholic Church, and many other religions do have similar problems.
I think Name and shame them and stuff the cival libitarians if they say its unfair. Do the crime, do the time.
Just my 2 cents.
Originally posted by suzy ryan
I can't help but wonder why so many members of secret societies and occult groups 'care' so much to play down or debunk the fact of Organized, Protected Satanic Child Abuse Rings.
Originally posted by gps777
Sadly and as a Christian this quote is what i believe to be true,and for your morals and honesty on this issue Saldorri,the differences and confusion i think about it is that no where in the Bible are we taught what these Preists from supposedly Christian Churchs have done,where there seems in Crowleys writtings about rituals that included child sacrifice correct me if i`m wrong.
Magick and Theory and Practice. CP 12
"You are also likely to get into trouble over this chapter unless you truly comprehend its meaning".
2 Kings 6:29
So we boiled my son, and did eat him: and I said unto her on the next day, Give thy son, that we may eat him: and she hath hid her son.
Ezekiel 4:10
And thou shalt eat it as barley cakes, and thou shalt bake it with dung that cometh out of man, in their sight.
Hosea 13:16
Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.
Originally posted by Cug
Just wondering.. is there anything I can say that would convince you that Crowley was not a Satanist? OK didn't think so.
There is a part in chapter 12 of Magick and Theory and Practice that mentions child sacrifice. But this refers to to a sexual act that prevents the birth of a child (Masturbation). This is very similar to some Christian groups who are against birth control as it "kill" the potential child. If you take the time to read it you will see that Crowley ends this chapter with.
Magick and Theory and Practice. CP 12
"You are also likely to get into trouble over this chapter unless you truly comprehend its meaning".
See what happens when you just take a few quotes from a book?
Lumping people can be dangerous, bigoted and erroneous. Be careful.
Please read this whole link, burn it into your brain and remember it every time someone trys to tell you, "IF SRA happens, it's just the odd nut jobs". Give them the key details and if they still argue you can trust Governments to protect children...well I wouldn't ever be asking them to babysit.
Originally posted by gps777
Which from yours and others prospective your correct and Crowelys and easy assumtion for others to make from a Christian perspective.
Ok thanks,but can you post up the actual quotes like you did with the Bibles without breaking the censors,so we can read what it says?
For the highest spiritual working one must accordingly choose that victim which contains the greatest and purest force. A male child of perfect innocence and high intelligence
It appears from the Magical Records of Frater Perdurabo that He made this particular sacrifice on an average about 150 times every year between 1912 e.v. and 1928 e.v. Contrast J.K.Huyman's "La-Bas", where a perverted form of Magic of an analogous order is described.
"It is the sacrifice of oneself spiritually. And the intelligence and innocence of that male child are the perfect understanding of the Magician, his one aim, without lust of result. And male he must be, because what he sacrifices is not the material blood, but his creative power." This initiated interpretation of the texts was sent spontaneously by Soror I.W.E., for the sake of the younger Brethren.
Tho respectively my opinion is your beliefs are an abuse to God and anyone that is taught or encouraged to be involved in it which is a form of abuse.But not the kind on the said issue.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
BTW, my mom is employed by that bastion of perverse sodomorrific sin, the Steiner school. I've seen their operations, and they beat the Hell out of the public schools. I've never seen anything satanic about their curriculum or their results, so, whatever - the guy writing the article seems to think enrolling your child in Steiner school = evidence of ritualized sexual abuse, and that's a bunch of crap.
Originally posted by Cug
Yea I know it might be hard to differentiate between the two, but I really think you should make the effort. I'm sure you can come up with something that won't conflict with your religious views.
You can look to the many branches of Christianity and see how even with the same basic beliefs (Jesus died for your sins) you cant assume that one acts like the other, or even believes the same thing.
How would you feel if I took the beliefs of a Christian group like the Moonies or the Rastafarians and said that is what you believe?
It's not obscene. That's why Crowley hid the sexual stuff
Here is the major quote in question from chap 12
For the highest spiritual working one must accordingly choose that victim which contains the greatest and purest force. A male child of perfect innocence and high intelligence
It appears from the Magical Records of Frater Perdurabo that He made this particular sacrifice on an average about 150 times every year between 1912 e.v. and 1928 e.v. Contrast J.K.Huyman's "La-Bas", where a perverted form of Magic of an analogous order is described.
Egads that's 2,400 sacrifices in 16 years, and if you assume he continued doing this for the rest of his life you have to add another 2,850 to the total. Now lets think about it. do you really think anyone could kill 5,250 people over 34 years and get away with it?
Next thing of note is the date he claims to started doing it 1912. 1912 is the year he found about the O.T.O. sex magick stuff.
Now lets look at the second part about J.K.Huymans's book "La-Bas", La-Bas was a horror novel biased on Satan worship, the Black Mass (The "traditional" french version) and in it there is child sacrifice preformed (Remember this is a novel). This sacrifice is what Crowley basically calls a perverted form of the sacrifice he described. So in a nut shell what Crowley is saying is "real" child sacrifice is not what I'm talking about.
I'll try and find where in his autobio this is but the book is 3 inches thick... it may take some time. ;-)
www.hermetic.com... If you read it try reading it like a naughty hormone surging schoolboy.
Serpent nudge nudge wink wink
vessel nudge nudge wink wink
Originally posted by gps777
Thanks for your efforts and time Cug,"Do as tho wilt"is in essence exactly opossite to "God`s will be done".Which is pretty cut and dry,
To you there is no sin,and you live by your Law?.Which does come with guide lines and not as simple as "Do as tho wilt"
Understood, the difference is that God wants you to be Christian i`m just letting you know,Crowley and the Law could give two hoots whether your with them or not.
It does sound highly unlikely,but i have no idea,honestly of what happened back then.
I`m not pointing this at you Cug but there are tens of thousands of children that go missing in the US each year nowadays.I have read this about a year ago.
I see it as perverted as well,but i understand your saying Crowley was`nt into child sacrifice.How many other groups might misinterpret this and take it literal Cug?
If you think its worth it not just for my sake,I have been to the OTO site and have saved it for further reading,but when i`ve gone there i seem to be able to only stomach a little.I have read on there Crowleys poem about him and his g/friend and by just that one thing think he`s a sicko even
Eating exciment,and people taking his (Crowley`s)antics as funny is disturbing,Mocking Christ and hating him for who he was and what he did is something i will never never understand,God willing.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Let us make one thing perfectly clear, the rings are not imbedded in Christian groups.
Christ made it perfectly clear that you'd be better off with a millstone around your neck, headed for the bottom of the sea, than to cause harm to one of His children.
Such details, however, may safely be left to the good sense of the Student. Experience here as elsewhere is the best teacher. In the Sacrifice during Invocation, however, it may be said without fear of contradiction that the death of the victim should coincide with the supreme invocation.
WEH addenda: A sworn testimony by Crowley declares that he held actual human sacrifice to physical death to be the most efficacious, but that he never did such a thing. On the matter concerning death of the victim in invocation, Crowley elsewhere enlarges that this is the ephemeral death of the Ego.
Actual ceremonial details likewise may be left to experiment. The method of killing is practically uniform. The animal should be stabbed to the heart, or its throat severed, in either case by the knife. All other methods of killing are less efficacious; even in the case of Crucifixion death is given by stabbing.