It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bsl4doc
"Creation recycling" has GOT to be possible! I mean, we dig up prehistoric metropoli all the time...oh, wait, no we don't...hrmm, maybe the previous civilization had a strict religious stance against any sort of communal living, houses, nonbiodegradable materials, metal objects, plastic objects, fossil fuels, etc.
Oh wait, or maybe this theory doesn't hold water! That could be it.
Ciao
~MFP
Originally posted by bsl4doc
I take offense to your characterization of my beliefs based only on my status as a student. Perhaps you are the one who is a bit closed minded, no? Also, don't you find it a bit odd that there has never been metal jewelry, stone structures, or deep level organic remnants from humanoid cultures discovered other than our own progenitor cultures?
Ciao,
~MFP
Originally posted by bsl4doc
So, even taking into account tectonic movement, ice age, oceans, etc., you think that we wouldn't have found any remnants of a massive earlier culture? I just don't see the logic in that whatsoever. There is no evidence to support it, even if you think outside the box. The only supporting evidence you've offered is your own opinion. I mean, I could just as easily say "Hey, what if deep within the earth's mantle, there are small little gremlins stirring all that molten nickel and steel?!" Obviously, I can't prove this, but it also seems so far removed from the realm of reality that it almost certainly is not true.
Ciao,
~MFP
Originally posted by bsl4doc
I'm not saying that there aren't intelligent people on here, and I'm not saying that you shouldn't research such things. I'm simply saying that when you can't find a shred of evidence before posting something, does it really belong? If I can sit here, without doing more than 10 minutes of googling, and use only my common sense to shoot about 100 holes in this theory, does it even seem plausible? I just don't see how it can, sorry.
Originally posted by bsl4doc
Thinking outside the box does not mean disregarding the actual theory of tectonic motion, applying a different concept of physics, ignoring a lack of evidence, and literally fabricating a situation in your mind and acting as if research has been done on the topic.
I thought about just forgetting about you last thread and moving on. But then I thought about adding...
Tectonic motion has nothing to do with this question.
Different concepts of physics? Nice try!
Ignoring lack of evidence? That's what cynics say right before their theory is debunked.
Fabricating a situation in your mind and acting as if research has been done on the topic? I was studying the history of biodegradable compounds using organic dissimilation. And many products including some soft metals can breakdown molecularly in reletively soft heat over a long period of time. So I had a thought, Atlantis, who were thought to be highly intelligent, perhaps had the Earth in mind first hand and didn't modernize to the point where it is in great abundance now.
Marine Biologists say that we've researched and analyzed approximately .3% of the ocean floor. That is a large area to just disreaguard.
Originally posted by bsl4doc
I thought about just forgetting about you last thread and moving on. But then I thought about adding...
Tectonic motion has nothing to do with this question.
Different concepts of physics? Nice try!
Ignoring lack of evidence? That's what cynics say right before their theory is debunked.
Fabricating a situation in your mind and acting as if research has been done on the topic? I was studying the history of biodegradable compounds using organic dissimilation. And many products including some soft metals can breakdown molecularly in reletively soft heat over a long period of time. So I had a thought, Atlantis, who were thought to be highly intelligent, perhaps had the Earth in mind first hand and didn't modernize to the point where it is in great abundance now.
Marine Biologists say that we've researched and analyzed approximately .3% of the ocean floor. That is a large area to just disreaguard.
I brought up tectonics because either you mentioned geological transformation, oceans in Utah, and civilizations under the Mediterranean, all of which are supposed to have happened due to the ice age and tectonic motion. However, the idea that these events could wipe out all traces of entire civilizations is just scientifically ireesponsible.
As to you ignoring the laws of physics, yes, I know SOME metals will eventually reduce to atmoic levels due to pressure and heat. However, are you suggesting ALL metal used by ALL people in previous civilizations have done this? That's right up there with the simple answer "God did it", which I just don't buy. As for the biodegradable issue, sure, a civilization may have been more environmentally sound than today's cultures, however, there are certain things in the world, such as steel, which are not harmful, nor are they biodegradable. And are you also suggesting they never wore gold, silver, platinum, etc jewelry? That's an awfully illogical stance to take, assuming the people never used metals in large quantities for anything. I highly doubt an entire world would ignore deposits of strange, very hard and malleable materials they found in nature around them.
Finally, I don't get the point you're trying to make about my statement regaring your lack of evidence. How is it that may theory is about to b e debunked? If anything, your theory is backed into a corner and you need to provide something, anything, to prove it is even 0.00001% plausible. So far, all you've done is ridicule my ideas and spout off personal opinion.
Ciao,
~MFP
Originally posted by bsl4doc
So you think I'm off center to think that previous civilizations most likely used naturally occuring metals and alloys? You think they survived for a long length of time without any sorts of metals? Even isolated tribes have been noted to use some basic metals. Also, where is your source for the .3% figure? While I'm sure very little of the ocean floor has been visited by MAN, a great deal of it has been explored via robots, sonar, and subs.
Ciao,
~MFP
Oh, and if you can't deal with sarcasm, stay in your little box. People out here in the real world tend to be cynical.
I also like sarcasm, but expect a reaction. If you take the time to read, you will see that the Hopi Indians believed that the world had seen four great civilizations. And a great purification was going to happen to ready the world for the fifth great civilization. This coincides with many prophets visions of the end of the world as we know it. Have you ever heard of Atlantis? Anyway, these facts alone would be enough to back up a question (as the title of the thread). Thank you...
PS. I also found it funny that you think civilizations can't survive without metal (yet another example of an "in-box" thinker).
AAC
Originally posted by bsl4doc
I also like sarcasm, but expect a reaction. If you take the time to read, you will see that the Hopi Indians believed that the world had seen four great civilizations. And a great purification was going to happen to ready the world for the fifth great civilization. This coincides with many prophets visions of the end of the world as we know it. Have you ever heard of Atlantis? Anyway, these facts alone would be enough to back up a question (as the title of the thread). Thank you...
PS. I also found it funny that you think civilizations can't survive without metal (yet another example of an "in-box" thinker).
AAC
Emphasis mine.
Let me get this straight. You're saying that myths about a magical city, the stories of Native Americans, and your own personal BELIEFS, amount to FACTS now? You do realize that that makes you sound like a tad bit of a loon, right?
Also, can you provide me with any info on a civilization that has survived without metals? I doubt you can considering most of the earth's crust and geological formations are metals.
www.mysteriousplaces.com...
Deep within the jungles of Mexico and Guatemala and extending into the limestone shelf of the Yucatan peninsula lie the mysterious temples and pyramids of the Maya. While Europe was still in the midst of the Dark Ages, these amazing people had mapped the heavens, evolved the only true writing system native to the Americas and were masters of mathematics. They invented the calendars we use today. Without metal tools, beasts of burden or even the wheel they were able to construct vast cities across a huge jungle landscape with an amazing degree of architectural perfection and variety. Their legacy in stone, which has survived in a spectacular fashion at places such as Palenque, Tikal, Tulum, Chichén Itzá, Copan and Uxmal, lives on as do the seven million descendants of the classic Maya civilization
The Maya are probably the best-known of the classical civilizations of Mesoamerica. Originating in the Yucatan around 2600 B.C., they rose to prominence around A.D. 250 in present-day southern Mexico, Guatemala, northern Belize and western Honduras. Building on the inherited inventions and ideas of earlier civilizations such as the Olmec, the Maya developed astronomy, calendrical systems and hieroglyphic writing. The Maya were noted as well for elaborate and highly decorated ceremonial architecture, including temple-pyramids, palaces and observatories, all built without metal tools. They were also skilled farmers, clearing large sections of tropical rain forest and, where groundwater was scarce, building sizable underground reservoirs for the storage of rainwater. The Maya were equally skilled as weavers and potters, and cleared routes through jungles and swamps to foster extensive trade networks with distant peoples.
The volcanic highlands, however, were the source of obsidian, jade, and other precious metals like cinnabar and hematite that the Mayans used to develop a lively trade.
The technical process of metal working was also highly developed