al Qaeda's master bomb maker killed in U.S. strike!

Originally posted by Riwka
Oh Pakistani officials and intelligence said so. They said

Sure they Have.

They can talk now ANYTHING they want and sell us some more Bull# News.

3 Top al-Qaida Operatives BELIVED Killed

All the officials stressed that none of the militants' bodies have been found.

"We do not have any evidence to prove that they have been killed, but we have indications that they were there and were among those bodies that were taken away," one official said, declining to elaborate.

Sorry, but there simply is NO Evidence.

Even the Title says BELIVED to be Killed, which means that there isn't any Proof for that. It's just another way to Cover up US Terrorist Actions, in which SEVERAL Civilans have lost their Lives yet AGAIN in the so-called Precision Missile Attack.

Originally posted by Souljah

Even the Title says BELIVED to be Killed,

Yes, that is your old news source

Go one page back and see Pavils news source: "Pakistani intelligence sources on Thursday identified three"

or google the Pakistani news sources.

There you can also find, that the civilians all belong to one family..... .....al-Zawahri has a wife from a tribe prominent in the region around the attacked village and the family invented him.....(I've posted this somewhere in that '1000 tribesmen....-thread')

Yes, I also feel sorry for the children - used as human shields by their own families (And those families are not at all innocent civilians, if they support and invite el-Qaeda members.)

sometimes i wonder why, in this day of modern technology and all, they cannot bomb a certain area with a gas designed to render people unconscious and then go in with troops. that way, suspects can be taken and innocent lives saved

Originally posted by Riwka
Yes, that is your old news source

OLD,
or not up to your Anti Terror Standards?

From the Yahoo News:

By MUNIR AHMAD, Associated Press Writer
1 hour, 35 minutes ago

News was Posted ONE HOUR Ago.

Is that not NEW for you?

Or maybe you dislike Associated Press Writers - especially those whos names are Munir AHMAD, huh?

I am Sorry, but the Article providing This News in this Thread is from Yesterday, which makes it OLDER then the source I provided.

[edit on 19/1/06 by Souljah]

can anyone tell me why the mighty US army didnt send one of their legendary snipers, i mean sharpshooters" to do the job, but instead proceeded to bomb the hell out of them ?

Oh and while theyre at it (bombing villages in Pakistan i mean) would it be that hard to drop a couple of blankets and some food ratios to the victims of the recent earthquake over there? I mean they dont have to do separate flights, just drop the supplies to help the helpless kids freezing over there first and then proceed to the usual carpet bombing routines

Originally posted by Souljah

OLD,
or not up to your Anti Terror Standards?

No, just old.

Probably, the AP-writer just woke up and did not look for the latest avaliable news to write his article. Who knows....

(BTW: I assume there are not that many ...lets say Jews.... among the reporters who write the Pakistani news sources, hm? )



[edit on 19-1-2006 by Riwka]

Originally posted by Riwka
No, just old.

The Article was Just Updated 12 Minutes ago.

How can you call that OLD is Beyond me...

But okey - you are entitled to your Opinon.

Probably it is just my bad english skills, so I am sorry if it was not clear:

For me, an article is always "old" (even if it is updated 30 seconds ago) when I think the reporter did not look up for the latest updates / pressreleases etc. who might be avaliable (here: from official Pakistani sources).

However, in regard to this strike IMHO there was a meeting sheduled - and the family knew whom they invited when they provided their homes for places of refuge and they also knew their innocent children would be lost in the consequences of using them as a human shield in an attack.






[edit on 19-1-2006 by Riwka]

well hell thats a great way to pick and choose whatever news sources and updates you want. if it doesnt go side by side with your opinion on what happen and another article does the other one is just not up to date because the editor isnt. i guess i could say the same thing about yours, he was just misinformed and hasnt checked his news sources. this is an awesome way to never believe anything that doesnt go along with what you say.

one of you give me a list of sources that say the same thing, then your right. both of you are fighting over one source to one other source. why dont you get like 5 or more in your favor, lot more convincing. unless of course you cant find any then i guess that would explain that.