It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Secret message from "Shallow Throat."

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 30 2003 @ 01:07 PM
link   
The high-ranking GOP mole, who had provided exceptional information and advice from inside the White House and now in another government agency, didn't want to risk being spotted in conversation anywhere near Washington, D.C. Lubbock, Texas, is not near anything.

www.crisispapers.org...

Is it real or is it Memorex?



posted on Sep, 30 2003 @ 01:33 PM
link   
it's bogus. not as if 'shallow throat' said anything other than common anti-Bush rehtoric.



posted on Sep, 30 2003 @ 01:33 PM
link   
True or Not the article made a couple of good points.

"For one thing, as I've been telling you for more than a year now," said ST, "quit paying so much attention to Bush -- he's just their front guy -- and focus on Cheney. He's so deep into scandal, hypocrisy, lying, corruption, the blood of innocents, that he should be the obvious target. And probably will be the first member of the Administration to be impeached, if he doesn't resign first, 'for health reasons.'

I've always been of the belief that the real mastermind behind the whole Neo-Con agenda was Cheney. Bush is just a puppet in this whole conspiracy. Cheney is the real president as far as Im concerned.

"But there are a couple of provisos," replied Shallow Throat, with a grimace. "Al Qaida could bail out Bush again, if they're able to launch another huge attack inside the U.S. before next November. But, even if that never happens, the one fly in the ointment is the computer-voting scandal.

Another terrorist attack before Nov.?? Thats one of my biggest fears these days. How convinient would it be for another major terrorist attack to happen allowing FEMA to activate its emergency protocols and allowing Bush to stay president. And as we have seen in the past. People will support the president when they are scared. And in that fear they are likely to re-elect Bush.

"This is a catastrophe waiting to happen on a grand scale; it's already happened on a smaller one. The vote-counting software is child's-play to break into and manipulate -- and the glory part is that you can do it without anybody being the wiser. The computer-voting issue, finally, is getting into the mainstream consciousness and media, and so it won't be as easy to hide the issue anymore. But unless the pressure is unrelenting and the demands so intense to fix this scandal -- the three companies that control most of the software are all tied into the Republican cause -- the results once again could be skewed to give Bush a victory that he didn't win. If that happens, it's political, and maybe actual, civil war.

Another thing that the major media is not reporting. The fact that the companies in charge on the new electronic voting machines are all tied to the republican party. Hell the chairman of Diebold held a fund raiser for Bush just last week for God's sake!! And these people are in charge of the next elections? THE FIX IS IN PEOPLE!!!



[Edited on 30-9-2003 by Ocelot]

[Edited on 30-9-2003 by Ocelot]



posted on Sep, 30 2003 @ 01:40 PM
link   
Of course, the FIX is in. Our country is being run by traitors and criminals.



posted on Sep, 30 2003 @ 02:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by Colonel
Of course, the FIX is in. Our country is being run by traitors and criminals.


Very observant. Its been run in such a manner for MANY years now...



posted on Sep, 30 2003 @ 02:03 PM
link   
Yeah, almost 3 years going since 2001.



posted on Sep, 30 2003 @ 02:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by Colonel
Yeah, almost 3 years going since 2001.


Nah.... I think way way before then Colonel.



posted on Sep, 30 2003 @ 02:05 PM
link   
Add a few decades to that number...

If you want to be realistic about it, its closer to about 400 years.



posted on Sep, 30 2003 @ 02:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by dragonrider
Add a few decades to that number...

If you want to be realistic about it, its closer to about 400 years.


Right on DR!
I would like to know what you thought of the article. Any thoughts?



posted on Sep, 30 2003 @ 02:08 PM
link   
Fine, if you want to get technical but realistically, these people are the most treasonous group of thugs EVER to inhabit the White House. ANd what's worse, they're incompetent.



posted on Sep, 30 2003 @ 02:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Colonel
Fine, if you want to get technical but realistically, these people are the most treasonous group of thugs EVER to inhabit the White House. ANd what's worse, they're incompetent.


I would agree with you with one exception. There was one group who was far worse....

The Klintons.



posted on Sep, 30 2003 @ 02:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by Colonel
Fine, if you want to get technical but realistically, these people are the most treasonous group of thugs EVER to inhabit the White House. ANd what's worse, they're incompetent.


I agree ther are the most incompetent bastards ever to serve in the White House. But the worst?? hmm I dont know. Many administrations have been pretty bad. But I guess you're right. I think Bush and Co. take the gold on this one.



posted on Sep, 30 2003 @ 02:13 PM
link   
I went to the homepage of the site where that page is and found the term 'progressive internet.'

Gee, where I come from that means socialist.

You people gotta confirm your sources better.



posted on Sep, 30 2003 @ 02:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by dragonrider
I would agree with you with one exception. There was one group who was far worse....
The Klintons.


I agree with DR. The Clintons should be right up there with the Bushes. They Both belong in Jail getting raped by a guy named "Big Dog" and some chick named "Bertha" for the ladies.


[Edited on 30-9-2003 by Ocelot]



posted on Sep, 30 2003 @ 02:16 PM
link   
Thanks, Ocelot, for being critically OBJECTIVE in this matter as any commonsensical person would. I understand that its difficult for a repugnant to do critical analysis of the political scene becuase of the PAINFUL cognitive dissonance that would occur if they actually accpeted the truth of the present administration.



posted on Sep, 30 2003 @ 02:18 PM
link   
Ocelot, maybe I spoke too soon. You flip flop too much.



posted on Sep, 30 2003 @ 02:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Colonel
Ocelot, maybe I spoke too soon. You flip flop too much.


Me Flip flop?? WTF?? Where did I flip flop?



posted on Sep, 30 2003 @ 02:23 PM
link   
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Colonel
Fine, if you want to get technical but realistically, these people are the most treasonous group of thugs EVER to inhabit the White House. ANd what's worse, they're incompetent.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I agree ther are the most incompetent bastards ever to serve in the White House. But the worst?? hmm I dont know. Many administrations have been pretty bad. But I guess you're right. I think Bush and Co. take the gold on this one.












Originally posted by Ocelot

Originally posted by dragonrider
I would agree with you with one exception. There was one group who was far worse....
The Klintons.


I agree with DR. The Clintons should be right up there with the Bushes. They Both belong in Jail getting raped by a guy named "Big Dog" and some chick named "Bertha" for the ladies.


[Edited on 30-9-2003 by Ocelot]



posted on Sep, 30 2003 @ 02:27 PM
link   
Oh ok that LMAO!!! Well its true. The Clintons were pretty bad. Maybe just as bad as the Bushes. Either Bushes and Clintons tie for the gold or the Bushes take the gold with the Clintons coming a close second to take the silver. Either way I think both were bad.
Jesus Christ Colonel you dont let anything slide do you?



posted on Sep, 30 2003 @ 02:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ocelot
Oh ok that LMAO!!! Well its true. The Clintons were pretty bad. Maybe just as bad as the Bushes. Either Bushes and Clintons tie for the gold or the Bushes take the gold with the Clintons coming a close second to take the silver. Either way I think both were bad.
Jesus Christ Colonel you dont let anything slide do you?


Sorry, G. I should ease up on the independents tho.




top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join