It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by marg6043
Occurs he is old enough now and he has seen it with skin he actually find it not very attractive I mean the skin.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
It's really more comparable to pierced ears or some other minor adjustment, of the sort we're quite accustomed to seeing
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
Circumcision doesn't reduce sexual pleasure in any meaningful way, at least not that I'm aware of
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
- Let's not forget aesthetics in our frenzy to abandon the practice on logical grounds. Do you want to be a cheapskate and gift your kid with a spam slug,
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
or do you want to be wise and charitable, facillitating the inheritance of a proper sceptre-shaped sceptre?
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
What about the pleasure factor for future partners? Is there any data on that? Is it a valid concern in making the decision?
Originally posted by C0le
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
What about the pleasure factor for future partners? Is there any data on that? Is it a valid concern in making the decision?
Who knows.
Male circumcision entails the cutting off of the foreskin of the penis. It severely weakens the power of sexual excitement and the capacity for sexual enjoyment.
...
Circumcision radically desensitizes the penis. The rich nerve network and all the nerve receptors in the foreskin are severed.
Originally posted by marg6043
I don't know about that skin stuff my husband has not problem when it comes to sensitivity.
Originally posted by C0le
1.Scaring/Scar tissue, And
2. The tissue is no longer protected by the foreakin, so the skin becomes rougher and thicker, from chafing and such.
Originally posted by Vegemite
you should know that the guys with the turtle necks are usually made fun of because of their turtle necks.
Originally posted by marg6043
Originally posted by C0le
1.Scaring/Scar tissue, And
2. The tissue is no longer protected by the foreakin, so the skin becomes rougher and thicker, from chafing and such.
I wonder if that has to do with bad medical procedures or only in extreme cases.
Originally posted by Elm
Why are over 80% of American baby boys circumcised?
No other country in the world (excluding relgious regions) has such a high rate of circumcistion.
Originally posted by marg6043
Let me clarify something here,
Laziness has nothing to do with the area of the genitals looking clean when the penis is circumcise.
To me is more attractive.
Originally posted by Englishman_in_Spain
Either or both of the above posts have been edited/deleted by an over zealous, over sensitive moderator.
The people with authority in this place are as bad as the ones we seek to expose.
How very sad, I now need to find a forum where freedom of speech is not at the discretion of a zealot.
I would advise those of you with other than mainstream views to reconsider your positions.
Goodbye.
Originally posted by Mirthful Me in a post originally by Englishman_in_Spain
*SNIP*
Originally posted by marg6043
Originally posted by C0le
Why would he complain about loosing something he cant even remember having?
Bingo!!!!!! he lost it at age two days so he never had it to Begin with.
I guess is just personal preferences. If you have it all your life then is part of you. If you grew up without it you won't miss it.
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
Sure. But you made that preference for your son. You took away his choice. I'm not saying your son isn't happy with your decision, but I personally always support freedom.