It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mad
NOW BECAUSE THE RUSSIANS HAVE A SUB THAT CAN WITHSTAND THE EXPOSION OF A REGULARE CHARGE
The nuclear depth charge configured ASROC on the other hand was a relatively simple device, as it was nothing more complicated than a ballistic, unguided rocket with a depth charge as payload. When employing either weapon, the idea was to place the weapon as close to the predicted position of the enemy sub and let the weapon work as designed. In the case of the depth charge, after water entry, it simply sank and detonated at a preset depth. The resulting shock wave did the rest -- water doesn't compress, but sub hulls do.
The resulting shock wave did the rest -- water doesn't compress, but sub hulls do.
Originally posted by Pyros
Ahhh! The old days, when nukes were a good thing....