It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Gazrok
If this assumption is correct, I'd love to know why we aren't using these 1000mph blimps nowadays....
Originally posted by SteveR
Sorry, in no way is that a picture from 1943.
It's a reconstruction, or possibly even a modern pic.
Originally posted by chinabean
man...that just looks gheyyyyyy!!!
hmm i didn't know pics from the olden days would have bevel and emboss to them
oh well...what's the record for fastest moving blimp anyway..considering their just a balloon of hot air and a little teenie tiny propeller in the back.
Originally posted by chinabean
if you want to see ufo's..concentrate your eyes in the skies in san diego..just watch the navy ships and in due time you'll see some tic-tac shaped flying objects at 29,000ft going 100mph heading south.
they also have a heat signature too..so whatever you are gonna use to see it with,make sure it can see the heat signature,the tic-tac shaped ufo has no widows or any type of exterior opening and are about 100ft long.
don't take my word for it..go look at it yourself and tell me if that's a blimp.
oh and they can go into the water as well..last year during a navy war game excercise they counted at least 100 of them on radar.
Originally posted by Gunman
I can't help but notice how you side stepped the fact that countless experianced pilots and flight crews have reported craft out running, following and staying with craft like 747's and Dc-8's, which would be like a bike keeping pace with a sports car.
So, where does one get a blimp that can go as fast as a bullet (quite literally) and make a perfect right angle turn without slowing down or turning?
Originally posted by nightwing
First real question. Is this comment serious, or casual ?
"Thanks, I'll include that in the book. " == rand
Originally posted by nightwing
Hmmm. I figured you would start with the 1942 Blimp over Los Angeles. If any sighting would match the locale, trajectory, etc...that one does.
quote: Originally posted by UnBreakable
So what about "blimps" that exceed 1,000 mph? That's harder to fathom than the ufo phenomenon. Sorry, I don't buy the "blimp" explanation for all the reported ufo cases.
www.nicap.dabsol.co.uk...
See another post about how to fool radar using two or more blimps.
Many people have a fundamental misunderstanding about how radar works, and especially how early radar sets operated. Until doppler radar came of age, radar sets didn't directly track the speed of an object. It more like, well, there's a blip here... and now there's a blip over here...it must be the same object because no other object shows up in the same general direction. But if the operator was actually tracking two or more separate targets it could easlily appear that one object was exceeding the bounds of reasonable physics.
It was a know problem from the earliest days of radar research, and one of the main reasons NORAD spent less money on radar equipment than on the computers and communications needed for fully-correlated targets.
I've noticed that more recent radar UFOs rarely seem to exceed Mach 1, while UFOs from the 50s and 60s could dart off at 8000 mph with no trouble. It's probably due to the better equipment we have now.
Please note that the visual sighting associated with the Sebago affair couild have easily been a blimp: the sun was just a few degrees below the eastern horizon, at an azimuth of around 100 degrees, while the the object was high in the west, over 30 degrees, at an azimuth of 270 degrees. Under those conditions a silvery cigar-shaped object would have lit up like a klieg light in the dark pre-dawn sky.
Sgt. Robert Blazina: (ret.), August 2000
Mr. Robert Blazina is a retired military man with a top-secret clearance. He worked transporting nuclear weapons all over the world. He personally witnessed a UFO maneuvering in the clear nights sky at an incredible speed straight up. Another time he and a civilian 747 both saw on their radar screens an object travel an estimated 10,000 miles an hour directly at them.
www.ufoevidence.org...
Originally posted by Keeval
Just to be devils advocate here...
For "some" of the speed related manouvers it could be possible that the blimp was stationary in the air. If a pilot did not check their RADAR systems and only used visual cues, it could be interpreted that the object approached the plane at high speed.. but in actuality it was the plane approaching the object at high speed.
However this would not work obviously on any of the reported inicidents that have been reported regarding RADAR.
Originally posted by UnBreakable
I guess witnesses from the Air Force, Marines, Army, civilian authorities, etc. , who use radar all the time, and have verified speeds greater than mach 1, have a "fundamental misunderstanding of how radar works" , even systems as recent as say 2000.
Tangential Velocity Measurement Using Interferometric Mti Radar
An Interferometric Moving Target Indicator radar can be used to measure the tangential velocity component of a moving target. Multiple baselines, along with the conventional radial velocity measurement, allow estimating the true 3-D velocity vector of a target.
Authors: Doerry, Armin W. ; Mileshosky, Brian P. ; Bickel, Douglas L.
Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (US); Sandia National Labs., Livermore, CA (US)
01 Nov 2002
Sgt. Robert Blazina: (ret.), August 2000
Mr. Robert Blazina is a retired military man with a top-secret clearance. He worked transporting nuclear weapons all over the world. He personally witnessed a UFO maneuvering in the clear nights sky at an incredible speed straight up. Another time he and a civilian 747 both saw on their radar screens an object travel an estimated 10,000 miles an hour directly at them.
www.ufoevidence.org...