UFO egyptian Symbols !

I was looking around on my pc and found some old picture folders were i store pics i have got from the net and a came across this pic first i thougt wow but am not too sure if its real just thought i would post it and see if i get any good opinions i am not sure were i got the image from must of been a good web site anyway here it is.....
img434.imageshack.us...
img481.imageshack.us...
no helicopters/tanks/or ufo's around that time?? if it is real then if not

this has bed discuss on this forum.
They are fake

lol thanx that pic getting deleted then lol

Can you tell us about the history of those tablets. Where were they found, do you have links to information on them at all.

I have never seen those images before and Im sure they would be more popular amongst theorists because they are obvious shapes. Im not calling fake yet, I would like more info on them though


*edit.. ah they are fake, Didn't see the other comments before I replied



[edit on 31-12-2005 by Mayet]

Originally posted by HDD09
this has bed discuss on this forum.
They are fake

Hello

I know these tablets but i never heard they were faked. HDD09, could you point me to a source where they have been proven to be fake ?

Thank you.

Fake???

Did those who said were fake visited the temple themselves or were they 'scholars' sitting in stuffy armchairs thousands of miles away working on their own doctorates, took a look at the pics and then passed judgement?

Or did one or 2 of them with awesome vocational titles to their names glibly make a mockery of ' one sees what they want to see' kind of statements?

That pic on the 1st thread is indeed 'doctored' or smudge on the portion under the 'chopper', not sure if it was intentionally done to ensure it looks fake, so that when others look at it and assumes editing work is done, therefore the rest of the 'vehicles' are fake too.

HOWEVER, if you were to make a trip to the Abydos Temple, you will be able to see what seems like strange current and futuristic representations of vehicles on the actual rock.

This has been discussed here, and elsewhere before (many times if I recall correctly). There are no pics of ufo's, helicopters or any other modern machinery in the hyroglyphs. What looks like a helicopter is actually a re-carving of a glyph on top of an old glyph. The old glyph was filled in with a paste to cover it up, which was widely done in ancient egypt, but the paste of plaster has since fallen away, revealing an old glyph combined with a recarved one the looks like a helicopter, but is not.

The following pic shows the original glyph and the recarved glyphs, then the combination of them, resulting in what we see today...

I am very sorry, but there is no helicopter or whatever in Seti I's temple at Abydos! As I said then, I can say again: it is a perfectly clear case of an ancient correction of a text which may now to a non-Egyptologist look like a helicopter. It is very common in tombs and temples that the original hieroglyphs were changed and then the first text covered by some kind of paste which has now disappeared so we can see part of the first text below the newer one.

Tine Bagh
Carsten Niebuhr Institute
University of Copenhagen

www.ufocom.org...

[edit on 1-1-2006 by sensfan]

Sensfan has pretty much got it.....

Yes, this is a confirmed hoax.... While it has been discussed, there's certainly no harm in reaffirming this one for someone who may not have been here or seen the original discussions on this one....

The old glyph was filled in with a paste to cover it up, which was widely done in ancient egypt

Is the best answer modern scholars can come up with, a case of 'palimpsest'? Did they actually made this judgement on while working and sweating it out on site or did they pass this observation from the comfort of an aircon office while sitting in the comfy stuffy chairs?

Was this the absolute final answer to the strange markings carved on stone in the Temple of Seti? Did the entire establishment accepted this as a fact? So was it 'fake' or a 'palimpset'?

If you really want the answer, the answer is none dares to do an official enquiry into the enigma of the abydos stones. To admit it is a fake or palimpset officially ( the real stones and not the pics) would throw the study of history into turmoil. For if it can be done, then why not for anything else carved in stone? If this is so, was history all but a lie? Afterall, mankind is not known to be infallible but subjected to base emotions, same with any current scholars with reputations to uphold and a career to look after. But to admit that such carvings are what it is, isnt it worse, that the ancients had access to advance technology, not rock and flint weapons as thousands of scholars had profited from the sale of books and research funds as well as respect from students all over the world???

It is totally reprehensible to offhandly brush off such markings as ' one in a million' or 'trick of light and plasters' without actually making an official study into it, if not downright criminal to the human race. Even criminals have a right to trial, but unfortunately, the abydos stones will remain in the deserts, drown by the sands of ignorance and intellectual slight of hand, with the cacaphony howling of psuedo intelligentsia decrying fools if anyone dares question such markings again.

Seeker is correct, so says so by Lord Tumahab.

Me thinks seeker is one of them... the aliens. He or she is just too intelligent like myself, to rightfully belong on Earth.

[edit on 2-1-2006 by Lord Tumuhab]

But it some thing i whas on a History chanal about things what a writen i the Pyraminds . that the Pharaoh saw one fire in the sky. bright like the sun. some later it came back bot now it was more of them. (UFO Ancient Aliens - (Fallen Angels) History Channel Documentary)

in this documantary you wil se that there some thing alien in Bibel an other religion. and much more

I thought these carvings/inscriptions were in fact on a wall of an ancient structure. I've been told they may not be fake, but in fact were the occurence where they did not have erasers. I have seen suggested theories (sorry no link, or resource) that this was the result of someone re-carving the wall to replace heiroglyphics that were pre-existing, but they had not finished the job. I've also read/heard of reports that these carvings do indeed predate helicopters, and hovercrafts. Again, sorry no link or resource, but thought these concepts were worth relating.

Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
I thought these carvings/inscriptions were in fact on a wall of an ancient structure. I've been told they may not be fake, but in fact were the occurence where they did not have erasers. I have seen suggested theories (sorry no link, or resource) that this was the result of someone re-carving the wall to replace heiroglyphics that were pre-existing, but they had not finished the job. I've also read/heard of reports that these carvings do indeed predate helicopters, and hovercrafts. Again, sorry no link or resource, but thought these concepts were worth relating.

You are correct. See my post a few posts above.

Ahh, sorry Sens. I thought you were saying it was a deliberate hoax, but was interrupted from my reading a few times while trying to focus. So, I started reading over again and totally missed your first post somehow. I apoligize for my confusion. Thanks for re-directing me.

Aren't they from the Abydos Temple??

Yep, they stated this earlier. Good pic though, I've never seen it from this angle before. Are we sure these symbols are due to re-plastering and flaking? Is this absolute truth, or a group's educated opinion?

here's another photo taken from a slightly different angle



if these are fakes then there very impressive

Great pics,they seem kinda real on those shots dont they

ya, they sort of look like the same as an original would, but I'm no "expert".

From these angles you can't really see the chipping or flaking off, but then again we may be talking about the same stone masons that had knowledge enough to build the pyramids.

I would like to add that in some documentary (sorry, i don't know which one) they did present a powerful case to me that there was a casting over and flaking. There are some pertinent links in previous contributions above that strongly support this as well.

But, you are right. I don't neccessarily see it as justified from these pictures in and of themselves.

Excellent find in supplied link further down!!

if these are fakes then there very impressive

Ya, and considering the amount of guardianship and reverence for giza and surrounding ancient structure since early 1900s (prior to helicopters existing) it is hard to imagine people being permitted to deface the walls of such structures without restoration efforts being made. Makes one wonder, and ponder the plausibility of it.



Aliens in heiroglyphs of Egypt pyramids?

Link:
www.dudeman.net...

Scroll to the bottom, also, of supplied link. Possible Greys in heiroglyphics of Saq. pyramid, one of the oldest in Egypt. Supports Doggon Tribe (google) claims of "Ant People" from heavens (Syrius, aka "Dog" Star). Called Dog star after the Doggon tribe of 60 miles outside Tim buk too, Africa.

I'm unsure how to add a picture to a post, so if you know how, please add the bottom pictures from supplied link, the pictures that look like modern day reports of "greys". I'm sure arguements exist for both sides. Heiroglyphs at bottom are intriguing, and worthy of acknowledgement, no matter what peoples opinions may be.

At some point the collective sum of coincidences will add up to more than just coincidences.


[edit on 5-1-2006 by Esoteric Teacher]

[edit on 5-1-2006 by Esoteric Teacher]