It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by American Mad Man
It really doesn't matter which way we come in - we will win either way.
Is that what you define as a military force? How about saboteurs aka. partisans aka. insurgents? Are they not to be counted as a military force?
How are the US military personell going to fight them, w/o having the US Government start to draft people again. At one point, the US citizens won't volunteer anymore, how will you defeat an enemy military force then? By throwing propaganda pampflets by airplane?
Originally posted by xmotex
The Iranians are sitting on a lot of oil, after all.
You are one of the main members here that continually and habitually talk about the US and Israel not fighting war by legal International standards and the rules of war, but wait: the use of suicide bombers by Iran is AOK and certainly meets legal International standards and the rules of war, huh, ArchAngel?
Originally posted by Seekerof
Current energy estimates by energy experts stipulate that Iran's oil extractions are already at or near peak levels, and within the coming next couple of decades will need alternative fuel sources.
Here is something else to consider: How much oil does the US import or buy from Iran?
How much oil does the US import or buy from Iran?
Originally posted by xmotex
Nada, but that doesn't mean we wouldn't like to.
And considering it's not just in Iran, but worldwide, that consumption seems to be approaching the limits of production, that simply adds more urgency to the matter for those who would seek to make sure they have an edge in supply.
I don't think the conflicts in the region are "all about oil", but it's deliberately obtuse to pretend oil has nothing to do with them either.
Originally posted by Ulvetann
And the US isn't in the same situation? Why have them invaded Iraq, and why are they pumping CO2 in the ground, in oilfields in Texas? Perhaps, because they have dried up?
Nothing, Russia does, that's one reason why US wouldn't mind, but hasn't taken on Iran, yet.
Originally posted by Seekerof
You are aware that Saudi Arabia holds 25 percent of the world's oil reserves?
As such, you are also aware that the US has oil shale in equal to or in excess of Saudi Arabia's known oil reserves?
Nothing, Russia does, that's one reason why US wouldn't mind, but hasn't taken on Iran, yet.
Care to clarify this a bit more?
Not fully comprehending what your trying to assert.
Originally posted by Ulvetann
Out of the given percentage, would YOU go to war against Saudi-Arabia? -or Iran?
Correct me, if I am wrong, aren't The Saudi very good friends with the Bush-clan?
Isn't the Saudi army and airforce state-of-the-art equppied, surely on level with the US?
Isn't the Saudi citizens way more feroucious than the average G.I. Joe?
Isn't the United Emirates the most powerful entity regarding oil-trade, would you have the US Abrams M1A4's run out of diesel in Sahara, Rommel-wise?
Purely picturesque, I would define the US as a brat, trying to beat his older steroid-pumping big brother with a baseball-bat. He might surprise, and give the big brother some pain, but the pain would surpass, and when the steroid brother got aggroed, the big brother might do something bad.
Since the US cannot attack Saudi-Arabia, they will have to do with the less powerful.
I am stating that the US is not buying from Iran, but Russia does.
They don't want to upset Russia, because Russia want to continue their trade with Iran. If the US interfere with the interests of Russia, Russia will surely make the US effort of 'liberating' Iran way harder. Perhaps not in a openly declared war, but the russians play the same game as the US. A lot of covert operations. Imho, Russia is one of the factors, that keep the middle-east 'stable' from further escalating into a fullborn crusade. If Russia had no interest in Iran, Iran would more likely be open for an attack by the US.
I wonder if the US wouldn't mind having Israel bombing Iran instead!
Surely? Hardly.
Though the Saudi Arabian military and air force may have US equipment, overall, that equipment, and subsequent level of training, etc, is not on par or on a level with the US, period.
Isn't the Saudi citizens way more feroucious than the average G.I. Joe?
Save the conjecture and back it with sourced fact, m'k?
Since the US cannot attack Saudi-Arabia, they will have to do with the less powerful.
Again, nothing more than speculative conjecture backed by nothing remotely factual.
Originally posted by Poison
War War War
Sheesh is that all you people think about? Freaking Facist