It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Area of fence to the right of the impact area partially flattened by the right engine of the plane... (obviously the right engine took out the fence to the right of those poles) and the entire back side of the fence has been torn away. The generator was hit by the right wing and engine before the 757 hit the building...
Closeup of generator smashed in the front and gouged on the top - hard to image a missile accomplishing both of these. But if the right engine of a 757 hit the front of the generator, part of the wing could gouge the top. At the very least, something very large, and very heavy smashed into this extremely heavy diesel generator.
Click the image on the left to view a large top-down image of the impact area, including the large diesel generator which is visibly damaged, and actually spun ~45 degrees from the impact! Most importantly it is spun ~45 degrees towards the building - if this was a missile or a bomb, the explosion could ONLY have spun it away from the building.
- CatHerder: Evidence That A Boeing 757 Really Did Impact the Pentagon on 9/11
3.2 EYEWITNESS INTERVIEWS
The aircraft pulled up, seemingly aiming for the first floor of the building, and leveled off. Probst hit the ground and observed the right wing tip pass through the portable 750 kW generator that provides backup power to Wedge 1. The right engine took out the chainlink fence and posts surrounding the generator.
The plane approached low, flying directly over him and possibly clipping the antenna of the vehicle immediately behind him, and struck three light poles between him and the building. He saw his colleague Frank Probst directly in the plane’s path, and he witnessed a small explosion as the portable generator was struck by the right wing.
6.1 IMPACT DAMAGE
This is consistent with eyewitness statements that the right wing struck a large generator before the aircraft struck the building and that the left engine struck a ground-level, external vent structure.
- Pentagon Building Performance Report
could the small area of one of it's wings have enough force to spin the heavy diesel filled generator 45 deg toward the Pentagon
Originally posted by HowardRoark
could the small area of one of it's wings have enough force to spin the heavy diesel filled generator 45 deg toward the Pentagon
The generator was a trailer mounted one on wheels, you can clearly see that in those pictures.
The weight is generaly balanced on the wheels with only a small portion on the tongue.
So, IMHO, the answer would be yes, It wouldn't take much force to spin the generator.
Originally posted by Killtown
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Or a UFO tractor beam. We really have to include this theory also.
Personally, I like the idea that it was an invisible balrog.
Originally posted by ihatescifi
Honestly... are people still debating the pentagon plane/missile thing? Come on people think about it. If you were the government trying to stage all of this why would you fly a missile over in full view of a busy road... it just dosen't make sense. If they were staging it they would have used a plane because people could see it!
Is there an original unedited source of this photo?
This one i see around the traps has had quiet a bit of work done to it in photoshop (not talking about the text and arrows).
Originally posted by Killtown
Is there an original unedited source of this photo?
This one i see around the traps has had quiet a bit of work done to it in photoshop (not talking about the text and arrows).
www.defenselink.mil...
Originally posted by TheShroudOfMemphis
Ah, cool, thanks for that.
Check it out, it's like one of those newspaper 'spot the difference' photos.
I'm not sure how or if this changes anything but there is obvious edits to the photo for some reason or another.
Originally posted by Nventual
It's just had it's lighting and sharpness increased in areas.
Oh, and that pole thing, you can even tell where they shopped it out; they did a real bad job of it too.
[edit on 14/12/05 by Nventual]
On the photo to the left taken from an aerial shot, doesn't the rear gouge into the roof seem relatively deep and the beginning of the gouge in upper portside facade seems crushed in pretty good, yet on the photo to the right taken from the ground, doesn't the beginning of the gouge look like it's just a relatively small dent?
Originally posted by AdamJ
wow thats really weird, even the defense.mil one looks suspitious.
What is that pole? what is it doing there?
Originally posted by TheShroudOfMemphis
The defense.mil picture has been processed, it's far from the RAW image i would say.
If you look at it closely in Photoshop you can see that it's had a layer of 'noise' added to it - a fine grain that is even throught the picture.
This is usually done to mix edges that can be left from airbrushing or cloaning. Adding to that the jpeg compression and it's a very good way to hide edits when doing graphical work.