It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Prepared 'eye-witness' statements saying that an airplane hit the pentagon

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 12 2005 @ 07:52 PM
link   
I was listening to a radio show today and a woman called in to say that on friday its coming out that an insider from the penatgon, an officer, is going to say that they were given prepared written statements to say that a commercial airline hit the pentagon

I dont know if i thats true obviously, there was a real lack of detail, but it might be worth watching out for, and ill update the thread if i see it.

It would make perfect sense to me. A pet theory of mine, and the only way of explaining so many 'eye-witness' statements about something which couldnt have happened.



posted on Dec, 12 2005 @ 08:08 PM
link   
Did the woman say where she heard that, or who she was or anything like that?



posted on Dec, 12 2005 @ 08:30 PM
link   
no unfortunately, but she was very clear about it which made me pay attention.
She said that she didnt want to list any names on air.

We will have to wait and see what, if anything happens.


BSB, what are your opinions on the pentagon explosion?
[edit on 12-12-2005 by AdamJ]

[edit on 12-12-2005 by AdamJ]



posted on Dec, 12 2005 @ 09:00 PM
link   
I haven't made up my mind. I've seen the hole in the facade before the collapse, and something about that definitely doesn't sit right with me. But of everything else I've seen, I can't make up my mind about much of anything. I did notice some oddities in the wing damage upon the facade, which I posted in the Pentagon thread a little while before CH went on her absence. Just really haven't made up my mind. Any way about it, though, it must've been an inside job, or some form of treason on some level at the very least, considering the attacks in NY. I know those towers couldn't have come down via gravity.



posted on Dec, 12 2005 @ 11:48 PM
link   
I know wt7 was a demo.
i think wt 1 and 2 probably were as well.

Whatever happened to that penatagon, the flight whatever it was that hit it was just to low and flying too fast to be credible. it cant have been a big passenger plane.
whatever happened its not what was claimed, that 3 frame video clip they released just makes it worse.
The flight was too low, its just not possible.

[edit on 12-12-2005 by AdamJ]



posted on Dec, 13 2005 @ 02:09 AM
link   
AdamJ; I belive this may be what you are talking about.

Listed in this weeks shows, Fri Dec 16th



Snip

The Power Hour

Former U.S. Navy and present inside the Pentagon on September 11th, 2001,
PAUL FLOWERS was one of many who were given "prepared written statements" to say that a commercial airline hit the Pentagon! Under those chaotic conditions, Paul thought his prescribed protocol was acting in national security's best interests - - - well, today he sees the big mistake he had made by not telling the immediate truth.

3rd HOUR - OPEN LINES: To call the show--toll free: 1 800 259 9231 or international: 952-707-9960 X125.

Monday through Friday, 7-10 AM CST.
night replay Monday-Friday 9-12 PM CST

www.thepowerhour.com...





[edit on 13/12/2005 by Sauron]



posted on Dec, 13 2005 @ 02:29 AM
link   
I really doubt a plane hit the pentagon. Most common question "Where is the plane wreckage?" I never seen any.

I wouldn't doubt that almost everyone on ATS has seen this.
www.freedomunderground.org...



posted on Dec, 13 2005 @ 02:42 AM
link   
well spotted, i'll look forward to that.
i cant believe anybody believes that a boing 757 hit the Pentagon, its just too rediculas to concieve there's a group of ppl on ATS that are convinced a plane hit the building, i'm sure they will contribute to this thread but there arguments have to be seen to be believed.

reinforced grass and disapearing planes


Bless there little cotton socks, All the best... ian

Deny Ignorence

[edit on 023131p://4416 by iamian]



posted on Dec, 14 2005 @ 07:58 AM
link   


Deny Ignorence

[edit on 023131p://4416 by iamian]


Allow me to deny everything you say then.



posted on Dec, 14 2005 @ 08:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by ihatescifi


Deny Ignorence

[edit on 023131p://4416 by iamian]


Allow me to deny everything you say then.


With pleasure ihatescifi, do you think the invisible plane that hit the pentagon is scifi? and is that why you hate it?

Watch the link in my signature, thats good scifi.

All the best



posted on Dec, 14 2005 @ 08:26 AM
link   
Regular people saw the plane hit the pentagon, why is it beleivable that one hit the WTC but not the Pentagon anyway? But agian, actual people saw it happen, SkepticOverlord personally knows someone that saw it hit, lots of people saw it happen, it was visible from a major highway.



posted on Dec, 14 2005 @ 08:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by Nygdan
Regular people saw the plane hit the pentagon, why is it beleivable that one hit the WTC but not the Pentagon anyway? But agian, actual people saw it happen, SkepticOverlord personally knows someone that saw it hit, lots of people saw it happen, it was visible from a major highway.


Why is there no pictures of the plane?
the hole in the pentagon before the collapse just doesn't seem adiquet damage for a 757, there was miminal damage and debri at the scene, there
are also witnesses who claim the contrary to SkepticOverlord's friend, there's too many things about it that make me feel uncomfitable, infact it bugs me, and i cant help that.



posted on Dec, 14 2005 @ 08:51 AM
link   
'SkpeticOverlord' knows someone ------- BUT YOU DONT
So its secondhand

It makes me laugh that ONLY IN THE USA can a 'Plane'
Not only create a Perfect hole in the Pentagon the begs belive
But 'On the same day' " more of those amazing planes managed to bring
down the Twin towers ...............LOL

Even a monkey knows this isn't possible without some degree of 'Help'

GOD BLESS AMREICA or rather God bless the American people because they need it !!!



posted on Dec, 14 2005 @ 09:05 AM
link   
I don't know what to believe either and these 'written statements' make things interesting, too. They don't prove anything, but add to the suspicion.

If it was a plane, why don't we see the many videos from all different security cameras from several angles that were mounted along the route? Why have those videos not been released? We certainly have plenty of video footage of the planes hitting the towers, why don't we have just one that shows a big plane crashing into the Pentagon?

Even 'eyewitnesses' can be wrong. Witnesses have been convinced that they saw or heard something they didn't. When things happen that fast, many times it just too much for the brain to analyze accurately.

I believe that WTC 1 and 2 were hit by planes and later, 1, 2 and 7 were all demolished, but I don't have a theory on the Pentagon. I don't trust the official story, though, just because of what happened in NYC that day.



posted on Dec, 14 2005 @ 09:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by andersonr
'SkpeticOverlord' knows someone ------- BUT YOU DONT
So its secondhand

It makes me laugh that ONLY IN THE USA can a 'Plane'
Not only create a Perfect hole in the Pentagon the begs belive
But 'On the same day' " more of those amazing planes managed to bring
down the Twin towers ...............LOL

Even a monkey knows this isn't possible without some degree of 'Help'

GOD BLESS AMREICA or rather God bless the American people because they need it !!!


I think if you are going to common sense it, four planes, four pilots who have never flown actual planes before, in a very stressful situation, four simultanious highjackings, three sucessful, and of those three all hit their targets precisely.

I think if you are going to do the math on it, the chances of at 75% success rate of the operation is rather amazing, unplausable really.

Just look at one small part of it, take a bunch of first time pilots, and have them steer into a target while having someone yell in their ear. Make two of the targets tall and thin, and one of the short and long. What do you think the sucess rate would be?



posted on Dec, 14 2005 @ 03:18 PM
link   
Sauron,
Thankyou very much. well done on finding it

---

I dont suppose these statements were writen up after the plane hit, so there was advanced knowledge....

[edit on 14-12-2005 by AdamJ]



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join