It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NumberCruncher
You cannot possibly say with certainty that they are ALL Australian.
And i bet if you went and actually asked the Lebanese if they are Australian you would be shocked how many would NOT identify with being "Australian" even if born in Australia.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Disgusting actions on the parts of the Australians, mobbing 'ferners'. Australian has a long history of horrible ethnic relations, brutally treating the aboriginals in country and denying non-whites access to the country via ethnic immigration quotas. Perhaps this lynching and mobbing shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.
[edit on 12-12-2005 by Nygdan]
Originally posted by Nygdan
How does any of that excuse the modern actions? People who run around in mobs beating up immigrants are pigs, and whats more, considering the history of places like australia, they should know better.
Originally posted by Nygdan
People who run around in mobs beating up immigrants are pigs...
Originally posted by Nygdan
How does any of that excuse the modern actions? People who run around in mobs beating up immigrants are pigs, and whats more, considering the history of places like australia, they should know better.
Originally posted by mad scientist
Originally posted by riley
The problem with that defence is that they were ALL Australians.
Very True, however the media doesn't portray it that way and the middle eastern youths involved don't seem to see themselves as Aussies.
Come to think of it why aren't the ' white ' Australians labelled as Anglo Saxon Australians like the Middle Eastern youths are labelled. Therein IMO lies the problem.
Originally posted by AceOfBase
Originally posted by Nygdan
People who run around in mobs beating up immigrants are pigs...
They were retaliating against immigrants who run around in mobs attacking Australians. Their actions were justified as it was about taking back their streets from the immigrant gangs.
[edit on 12-12-2005 by AceOfBase]
Originally posted by AceOfBase
Originally posted by Nygdan
People who run around in mobs beating up immigrants are pigs...
They were retaliating against immigrants who run around in mobs attacking Australians. Their actions were justified as it was about taking back their streets from the immigrant gangs.
Originally posted by riley
The first colonies were Anglo Saxon, most of them were rejected from england and they were the ones that developed the country [wiping out some natives along the way]. There was also a 'white australia' policy in effect for quite a while [I think]. Not sure on the specifics on that though.
Originally posted by XyZeR
So Ace, let me get this straight, if the original Aboriginee population would take to the streets, drunk, attacking random white poeple for oppressing them and taking their country from them, you would also justify that ? i hope You see my point....
Originally posted by riley
The justifed reaction to the lifeguards getting beat up was for the criminals to be charged, thrown in jail and publically shamed. That happened.. but beating up someone for walking down the street just for having darker [or lighter] skin is NEVER justifiable.. though of course it is in the minds of the ones that do it.
Originally posted by XyZeR
Originally posted by AceOfBase
Originally posted by Nygdan
People who run around in mobs beating up immigrants are pigs...
They were retaliating against immigrants who run around in mobs attacking Australians. Their actions were justified as it was about taking back their streets from the immigrant gangs.
[edit on 12-12-2005 by AceOfBase]
So Ace, let me get this straight, if the original Aboriginee population would take to the streets, drunk, attacking random white poeple for oppressing them and taking their country from them, you would also justify that ? i hope You see my point....