It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Zaimless
Hey did you know that Dragons are mentioned in the King James Bible, I guess that means that they are real, ya think?
Originally posted by SpartanKingLeonidas
Okay, I know dragons are supposed to be super duper intelligent, & sneaky as Hell, but if they exist, how come we haven't seen any in how many thousands of years?
Has to be a reason, either they are, or aren't real.
Originally posted by SpartanKingLeonidas
Okay, I know dragons are supposed to be super duper intelligent, & sneaky as Hell, but if they exist, how come we haven't seen any in how many thousands of years?
Has to be a reason, either they are, or aren't real.
Body length: 5.5m; Weight: 400kg.
They were carnivores. It is likely that giant ripper lizards both caught their own prey and scavenged, as the Komodo dragon does today. Extrapolating from the habits of the Komodo, it could easily have caught prey of twice its own weight, and could have tackled animals of up to 10 times its own weight.
Originally posted by TheBlueSoldier
Well, I'm not so sure that Giant Ripper Lizards are responsible for the myth of dragons mainly because of two pointz:
A) Australia is known for its wide variety of strange animals. In fact, Australia has dozens of species of marsupials including the wallaby, kangaroo, and koala bear while the rest of the world only has one kind of marsupial which is the possum. Since the Giant Ripper Lizard is indigenous only to Australia, how would people around the world know about it and create an entire myth around this animal?
Originally posted by TheBlueSoldier
Z) Dragons and Giant Ripper Lizards are both very large reptiles, but this is where the similarities end. Dragons are known to breathe fire or acid, fly with extremely large wings, have the knowledge of the greatest scholars, protect something sacred (whether it be treasure, land, etc.), and their facial features are extremely different.
Whatever its origins, the story has had remarkable staying power, and the myth persists that science says a bumblebee can't fly.
The statement was based upon an assumption that the bee's wing could be treated as a static aerofoil. However, in reality the bumblebee's flight is characterized by an oscillating wing that shares more characteristics with a helicopter rotor than an aeroplane wing.