It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Garden Spider
www.cnn.com...
According to this story, an airplane hit a building in Terhan, killing at least 116 people as of the latest update. But, the tower, even though it was on fire, the tanks of the planes were mostly full, etc., etc., etc., DID NOT COLLAPSE! Compare that to WTC Tower 7, which was not hit by a plane, and yet collapsed do to fire.
The Bijlmerramp (in English: Bijlmer disaster) was an airplane crash. On October 4, 1992, El Al Flight 1862, a Boeing 747 cargo plane of the Israeli El Al airline crashed into the Groeneveen and Klein-Kruitberg flats in the Bijlmer neighbourhood (part of 'Amsterdam Zuidoost') of Amsterdam, the capital of the Netherlands. A total of 43 people were killed, including the plane's crew of three and an unidentified "nonrevenue passenger". Many more were injured.
The plane, a cargo jet belonging to the Israeli carrier El Al, departed at 18h10 from Schiphol airport for Tel Aviv. Above the Gooimeer, two of the plane's engines broke off the right wing: A fuse pin on engine 3 sheared inappropriately due to corrosion, leaving the pod to tilt up and right due to gyroscopic forces, knocking engine 4 off the wing too. A China Airlines 747-200F freighter was brought down by the same causes in December 1991.
The crew remained unaware of the extent of the damage, being unable to see the wing. After circling twice the plane returned to the airport and attempted to land. During the approach the flaps were extended, which apparently rendered the plane uncontrollable. At 18h35 the heavily loaded plane crashed into a row of high-rise apartments called Groeneveen. The building caught fire and partially collapsed, destroying dozens of apartments. [emphasis mine]
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by AgentSmith
That building also looks to be made of concrete and not steel.
So what you have is a building of different construction, different materials, of different size and hit by an aircraft at a much slower speed and not head on.
Yo can't get much more different than that.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
An airplane crash caused a partial collapse of a building in Amsterdam in 1992:
The Bijlmerramp (in English: Bijlmer disaster) was an airplane crash. On October 4, 1992, El Al Flight 1862, a Boeing 747 cargo plane of the Israeli El Al airline crashed into the Groeneveen and Klein-Kruitberg flats in the Bijlmer neighbourhood (part of 'Amsterdam Zuidoost') of Amsterdam, the capital of the Netherlands. A total of 43 people were killed, including the plane's crew of three and an unidentified "nonrevenue passenger". Many more were injured.
The plane, a cargo jet belonging to the Israeli carrier El Al, departed at 18h10 from Schiphol airport for Tel Aviv. Above the Gooimeer, two of the plane's engines broke off the right wing: A fuse pin on engine 3 sheared inappropriately due to corrosion, leaving the pod to tilt up and right due to gyroscopic forces, knocking engine 4 off the wing too. A China Airlines 747-200F freighter was brought down by the same causes in December 1991.
The crew remained unaware of the extent of the damage, being unable to see the wing. After circling twice the plane returned to the airport and attempted to land. During the approach the flaps were extended, which apparently rendered the plane uncontrollable. At 18h35 the heavily loaded plane crashed into a row of high-rise apartments called Groeneveen. The building caught fire and partially collapsed, destroying dozens of apartments. [emphasis mine]
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by FredT
Hmmmm,
The apartment does not appear to be as large as the WTC nor the Pentagon, so it seems reasonable that is any part of the wing did not impact directly with the structure, it would be sheared off. The C-130 is a pretty robust design as well.
Originally posted by Killtown
Originally posted by FredT
Hmmmm,
The apartment does not appear to be as large as the WTC nor the Pentagon, so it seems reasonable that is any part of the wing did not impact directly with the structure, it would be sheared off. The C-130 is a pretty robust design as well.
Looks like the wing sheered off and landed at the base of that apartment building!
Originally posted by MERC
Much lighter and slower approach to what? We are comparing this to building 7, which was not struck by an aircraft, but by some falling debree. Which is going to hit hardest, an airbourne c-130, or a few falling pieces of steel?
Originally posted by MERC
Partial being the operative word here...
Originally posted by FredT
Depends on alot of factors. A few pieces of steel beams can weigh quite alot and spread thier impact over a very small surface area when impacting a surface. The impact can also have a tremendous impact depending an the angle and amount of shear force that is generated by that angle velocity. It depends on the construction of the building and the materials used. etc etc etc.
In otherwords almost every building is different and comparing one to the other is like apples and oranges
Originally posted by FredT
However, the C-130 in question is lighter and believed to be travaling at a much much slower rate of approach.