It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Iblis
Simply making an observation:
"In another incident, an Iraqi MiG-25PD, after eluding eight USAF F-15s, fired three missiles at EF-111 electronic warfare aircraft, forcing them to abort their mission.[5] This may have led to the later loss of an F-15 to surface-to-air missiles, due to the lack of electronic jamming."
Anyone else see what is wrong with this?
Originally posted by StellarX
As far as my information goes it was never flown.
Originally posted by StellarX
Sure some does but just how much can bear learnt about the capabilities of a plane that were not even flown at the time?
Originally posted by StellarX
Well according to the 'official' record the F-15 have managed the same feat.
Originally posted by StellarX
True but maybe a bit of context might indicate what might have happened had the USAF had to contend with a thousand of these planes in the 1980's?
Originally posted by Canada_EH
What about it? The fact that it slipped past 8 F-15s?
Originally posted by Iblis
Simply making an observation:
"In another incident, an Iraqi MiG-25PD,
after eluding eight USAF F-15s,
fired three missiles at EF-111 electronic warfare aircraft, forcing them to abort their mission. This may have led to the later loss of an F-15 to surface-to-air missiles, due to the lack of electronic jamming."
Originally posted by WestPoint23
No it was not, some specific systems were tested and the whole plane was disassembled for study but you are right it was never officially test flown.
With the pilot cooperating a lot more than we knew before.
Which should not be overlooked when one speaks of the F-15 Eagle, whatever your views on it.
I have no doubt the result would have been different, it is my opinion that the US was never in a position past the 60's to take on the Soviets over their own territory and "win".
Still, all the examples we have mentioned do nothing but validate the long held view that anything used properly and in the right scenario can bring you a desired outcome, most of the time that is.
You share this view. no?
Originally posted by StellarX
Sure but was the pilot 'cooperating' in any useful sense of the word? Why did he basically argue for the lowest specifications when recent history established the true capabilities?
Originally posted by StellarX
If one believes that non have been shot down...
you should'nt be so shocked, we brits have got SAM systems that can track the117 and the B2
Originally posted by WestPoint23
He was questioned and interrogated for five months, obviously we thought he was being cooperative enough.
lso, I am not aware of specific comments from Belenko that have been contradicted. He was citing the capabilities of the Mig-25 as he knew them in 1976.
Both versions have been shot down, multiple times, just not by other aircraft.
By the way, what is up with all those smug looking smilies?
Originally posted by intelgurl
Are you referring to the F-15 Streak Eagle? That was used as a platform for ASAT tests but AFAIK not ABM tests. Also the Streak Eagle was not as fast as the SR-71 but it did set some altitude records.
I could be wrong though, Got any links to back up the claim on the F-15's speed?