posted on Nov, 26 2005 @ 03:18 PM
Oh my. Could this report be anymore unreliable? An article written in an often inacurate website like Debka.com based on the alleged opinion of a
corrupt, Islamofascist, terror-sponsoring dictatorship. Did Syrian border guards run over and cut the ears off of all the US soldiers that they
killed in order to provide this "accurate" total of casualties? Give me a break.
There's no way in hell our troops would march into Syria without the overwhelming force needed to prevent these kinds of casualties. The title of
this whole thread is wrong because it's written as though its a statement of fact, when it couldn't be further from the truth in reality. Then we
have responses to this thread as though this article is the Gospel, without even questioning its legitimacy. Already the anti-war crowd is raising
hell about us invading the friendly and happy-go-lucky nation of Syria based on rumor that comes from at least 2 notoriously unreliable sources, Syria
and Debka.com. Give me a break guys! Shouldn't we be denying ignorance here? Or is that only when it suits our agenda?