It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by shots
the Achille Lauro comes to mind real fast.
[edit on 11/5/2005 by shots]
Originally posted by djohnsto77
Odium,
That's a pretty weak pirate. He doesn't even have a wooden leg or a parrot on his shoulder! :shk:
Originally posted by Shoktek
The added quote about Somalia at the end does nothing more to fortify any real evidence of terrorists being involved...yes, you do state that all you said is speculation, but I just think it's taking things a bit far to post it immediately after a factual article, in an attempt to swing the real facts towards a persuasive argument...maybe just post the facts, and then post your conspiracy theories in a different thread...
President Yusuf, aged 70, says "If his secular government fragments, Somalia will remain a failed state, its capital in the hands of Islamic terrorists who would step up attacks across the region, and the world."
Source
Originally posted by Zipdot
No they don't. "Terrorizing" implies the violent targetting of civilians for political gain.
This is for monetary gain.
No matter how "terrible" it is for civilians who are targets of robbery or piracy to GET ON THE GROUND AND SHUT UP OR DIE, the monetary motivation separates the acts of robbery and piracy from terrorization.
...
So, unless the pirates said GET ON THE GROUND AND SHUT UP, HAND US YOUR ROLEXES, AND THIS SHIP IS GOING TO CUBA IN THE NAME OF ALLAH AND FOR THE FREEDOM OF THOSE ILLEGALLY IMPRISONED IN CHINA, then it ain't terrorism.
Zip
Originally posted by djohnsto77
Here's a picture of the pirates:
< -- see photo above -->
Sky News/N. Fisher
Originally posted by djohnsto77
Here's a picture of the pirates:
[edit on 11/5/2005 by djohnsto77]
Originally posted by Shaker
I don't think it'll be long now where people will start calling nearly everything terrorism.
Originally posted by dr_strangecraft
seriously, you'd be surprised what small boats fishermen are comfortable with. Although who knows? Maybe Al Zarkawi is funding a submarine flotilla.
Originally posted by 0951
The ICC has been reporting on the instances of piracy during the year.
The concern about using piracy for terrorist purposes has been around for a little while now, as shown in this article from The Economist, in October 2003.
Originally posted by Luxifero
Nowhere in the given articles does Islamic terrorism assertained as posit causation of this said situation, and has been provided redundantly, this situation is one that has occured many times before.
Originally posted by Luxifero
Shots, you're obviously trying to repress your intention of gloomery observing this act of piracy. It's not new of you to claim Islamic terrorism where not evidence exists.
Luxifero