It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
TEL AVIV, Israel, Nov. 2 (UPI) -- Rome is within range of Iran's nuclear-capable missiles, Israel's foreign minister has warned.
Israeli Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom gave the warning Tuesday to his visiting Italian opposite number, Foreign Minister Gianfranco Fini, during a discussion on the Iranian nuclear crisis, the Tel Aviv newspaper Yediot Aharonot reported on its ynet.com Web site.
Originally posted by fisher571
Is it true ?
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
The question one ought to be asking is why does Israel feel then need to promote Iran (just as they did Iraq) as some sort of mad nation probably just itching to fire off those missiles at Europe
Originally posted by Nygdan
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
The question one ought to be asking is why does Israel feel then need to promote Iran (just as they did Iraq) as some sort of mad nation probably just itching to fire off those missiles at Europe
Considering that the leader of iran noted that anyone who is at peace with israel will burn in the unholy fires of hell, and that israel must be and will be annihilated, that characterisation isn't so outlandish.
Also, if this range is true, then the italians should be worried. What happens when the US attacks Iran, but has to do it on its own? The US has other strategic interests to protect besides european countries. And this guy is a radical straight out of the revolution itself. He might very well decide that, since the US is attackign them, that their only hope is to set off a greater conflict, a clash of civilizations. Hitting rome, or athens, etc, easily fits into that pattern.
thejunk
Maybe we should aim a few nukes Mecca's way?
We already have the same capability and threat level on mecca as tehran has on rome, in this article. They don't have missiles aimed at rome. If they did, then things'd be far far more sinister.
Hitting cultural and religious targets is immoral, rephrensible, wasteful, and utterly pointless. Hit military targets, use cultural items for what they are good for, propaganda.
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
The question one ought to be asking is why does Israel feel then need to promote Iran (just as they did Iraq) as some sort of mad nation probably just itching to fire off those missiles at Europe and so suicide their nation the moment they get nuclear weapons (something various US intelligence agencies say is at least 10yrs off - even if they are trying to get them).
Why do they want us all to get so scared of Iran?)
Originally posted by fisher571
Is it true ?
Originally posted by defcon5
their radical leaders have little fear of retaliation on themselves since they are furthering their gods work and thereby justified in their actions.
Originally posted by fisher571
Is it true ?
Originally posted by Riwka
Originally posted by fisher571
Is it true ?
This is the Yediot Aharonot article: Shalom: Rome in Iran missile range.
[edit on 2-11-2005 by Riwka]
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
.....and this individual wild crazy just happens to be desperate to suicide his nation.
They're about as scary as the supposedly 'mad Mullah' element in Iran some of you all seem determined to believe are just about to unleash nuclear weapons any and everywhere they can.
Maybe someone could explain what would make 'them' want to risk the vapourisation of any number of their own cities/Holy sites in retaliation just because you think they'd be interested in the 'symbolism' of wiping Rome off of the face of the earth?
Originally posted by defcon5
Well for one thing Christianity teaches that suicide is a sin and you go to hell, but Islam teaches that is the express train to the 7th level of heaven.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
I thought I read that Iran already had missiles which could reach Paris...