posted on Sep, 13 2003 @ 04:39 PM
Yes, when you compare Hitler to Bush or any of our leaders, Hitler, in the context of a leader, was way above the rest.
Hitler did not smoke, he rarely drank beer. he did not use drugs. he was faithful to his mistress Eva. he was a vegetarian. he truly believed in what
he did. Had he not been an evil psychotic racist lunatic who thought he could play general, and got off the whole aryan superman and geneocidal
tendancies and instead simply rebuilt Germany from its broken state, he would have probably been one of the most admire men in history. unfortunately,
his policies and intentions eventually ruined germany a second time. And led to the war that killed over 60 million Europeans and the death camps.
Bush, on the other hand, is a stupid, cowardly rich frat boy punk who went awol, did coke, and had affairs. hes a liar, cheater, a thief. And now hes
not doing much better than Hitler. Hes ruining the US and waging war against....everyone. If we had a leader that had Hitlers self discipline,
dedication, loyalty, and other admirable personal habits, without Hitlers sick "dreams" and desire to rule the world and kill all "subhumans" wed
have a shot.
America, however, can be compared somewhat to the rise of the third reich. minus the jackboots, of course, and the death camps.
But the death camps will come soon enough if Asscroft gets his way. And it wont be Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals, and jehocas witnesses this time. It
will be anyone deemed a threat.