It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
1). Why keep it secret? (Presedents like Reagan had a fantasy that the proof would unite the world)
2). Why do we have absolutely no difinitieve proof?
3). What could Elitists or whoever have to benifit from keeping it a secret?
4). If it exists, why wouldn't NASA have a better direction in their space plans?
UFO's have no purpose, or yet I haven't seen one... Maybe you guys have...
Originally posted by Kleversdad
Your idea of Satan and Demons has just as much evidence as ufo's or the loch ness monster.
I assure you the reason the world is not so concerned about UFOs is because they have a bigger problem. Bio-warfare and the biological agents the are no longer accounted for(stolen, lost). We don't have time for ghost and goblins when we have a strain of HIV that can be transmitted through sneezing.
Originally posted by lost_shaman
Originally posted by Kleversdad
Your idea of Satan and Demons has just as much evidence as ufo's or the loch ness monster.
When was the last time that Demons or the Loch Ness Monster were targeted on RADAR and visually confirmed?
Or taken seriously by the U.S. Air Force, Soviet Union, MOD, Brazilian Air Force?
Or left behind trace evidence ?
Or reported by millions of people from every corner of the Globe.
Or fighter Jets had to be scrambled because Satan was in U.S. , Soviet, Brazilian , French , British, Australian, Iranian ,Canadian, Mexican or Belgian Air Space?
The point being that there is good evidence that the UFO phenomena represents an Unknown Physical phenomena.
I assure you the reason the world is not so concerned about UFOs is because they have a bigger problem. Bio-warfare and the biological agents the are no longer accounted for(stolen, lost). We don't have time for ghost and goblins when we have a strain of HIV that can be transmitted through sneezing.
Last I checked we weren't dropping everything to focus on " Wee Beasties".
Originally posted by Kleversdad
Yeah I have heard those stories too. I also heard about bigfoot even saw a little footage on him, Does that mean it's real.
Let me let you in on a little secret. People lie sometimes.
How many of those radar sightings have you seen for yourself? How much trace evidence have you seen personally? Like I said before, a lot of people have motives driven by attention and greed.
Please do not present what you have read on the internet as fact unless you were there to see it.
Originally posted by Kleversdad
Yeah I have heard those stories too. I also heard about bigfoot even saw a little footage on him, Does that mean it's real. Let me let you in on a little secret. People lie sometimes. How many of those radar sightings have you seen for yourself? How much trace evidence have you seen personally? Like I said before, a lot of people have motives driven by attention and greed. So before you throw out "facts" about planes being scrambled in Belgium, unless you were there, don't preach it as gospel. I'm not saying these did not happen and that these people did not see anything. But I'm sure you did not happen to be in these countries in the radio control room scrambling fighter jets to intercept aliens or demons or whatever. At best it was our military using advanced physics in some way the general public is unaware of but doubtful. Please do not present what you have read on the internet as fact unless you were there to see it.
Carl Sagan's Common fallacies of logic and rhetoric
Ad hominem - attacking the arguer and not the argument.
Appeal to ignorance (absence of evidence is not evidence of absence).
Caricaturing (or stereotyping) a position to make it easier to attack.
Some Advise from Carl Sagan
Encourage substantive debate on the evidence by knowledgeable proponents of all points of view.
Arguments from authority carry little weight (in science there are no "authorities").
Spin more than one hypothesis - don't simply run with the first idea that caught your fancy.
Try not to get overly attached to a hypothesis just because it's yours.
Quantify, wherever possible.
If there is a chain of argument every link in the chain must work.
Observational selection (counting the hits and forgetting the misses).
Originally posted by lost_shaman
Kleversdad,
I think that anything that looks like a technological device that is defying gravity would give a person a damn good idea that it is not Human technology.
I also base that on the Fact that these objects have been reported similar to the one I saw for hundreds of years. They were called "Foo Fighters " in WW2.
J. Allen Hynek classified a Close encounter of the first kind as any sighting of a UFO within 500 yards or less.
A "Foo", or what Hynek would classify as a Night Light , was seen by me and two of my co-workers , after several minutes the NL moved across the Field and Hovered 30 yards from my parked car for five minutes.
I have absolutely no reason to lie about it.
I don't have any fans on ATS contrary to your belief.
Has it occurred to you that maybe the reason I sit around and talk about UFOs on ATS is because its possible that I've seen one!
Of course you don't consider that possibility because you already know that UFOs just can not be possible. So I must be a liar. Making up fairy tales all day just to trick unsuspecting people into thinking maybe some UFOs are real objects.
Maybe if you took an honest look at the evidence and ask yourself does the evidence that is available suggest that all people reporting UFOs throughout history are all Liars and Tricksters, or does the evidence suggest people are witnessing and reporting real events?
The evidence suggests people are reporting real events.
But its always easier to personally attack me than it is for you to justify your beliefs with the evidence available to you , because the evidence does not support your belief.
I beleieve people that have yet fullfilled that void inside them, which is the ultimate understanding of our purpose here, will more easily accept something which has no realistic proof.
I removed the object from the surgical sponge and placed it in the solution of blood serum for safekeeping and transportation. When this was done I noted the stainless steel instrument I had just used to transfer the object had been magnetized. This again is strange because these instruments are made to reduce the possibility of this occurring.
"The findings of these implant surgeries are highly unusual," reported Dr. Leir. "In all these cases, there was virtually no inflammatory response." This is not the usual finding in foreign tissue reactions. Normally, foreign bodies embedded in tissues result in some type of acute or chronic inflammatory response, and may include fibrosis and cyst formation. Such was not the case here. The pathology reports of the first two surgeries revealed that the metallic objects were encased in a very dense, tough, grey membrane consisting of proteinaceous coagulum, hemoseridin and pure keratin. More simply, blood protein and skin cells that are usually found in the superficial layer of the skin. The tough, biological "cocoons" encasing the implants were also found to contain nerve proprioceptors - nerve and pressure cells of the wrong tissue type for that part of the body. These implant cocoons also fluoresced a bright green color in the presence of an ultraviolet light source.
The implants from the two women from the second set of surgeries did not exhibit metallic properties like the implants from the first set of surgeries. In fact, the spheroid, whitish objects did not contain the tough, biological outer jackets, or fluoresce from a UV light source. These types of implants (possibly biological) also lacked the expected inflammatory response, according to the pathology reports. The crystalline-like object excised from the foot in the most recent surgery, also lacked the tough, grey, outer membrane and had virtually no inflammatory response, as in the other implant surgeries. Test results from the first set of implants revealed that the lammelar, needle shaped metallic objects in question are basically meteoric in origin, containing at least eleven different elements.
My question is this... Who is in control of this information? And what does China think about this?