It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by spamandham
What makes you believe such senses exist?
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
Originally posted by spamandham
What makes you believe such senses exist?
I have used 5th dimensional sensory perception during obes.
Can we now use the definition I posted?
Originally posted by spamandham
You can use it if you feel that such perceptions actually exist in the 5th dimension since you at least have a consistent definition, although I don't know how you can conclude OBEs involve extra dimensions.
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
When we are in an obe we cannot be seen by people in the physical. This has led me to believe that since we have a body, and we are undetectable by physical sensory perception, obes happen in another dimension...
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
How would you define soul?
Originally posted by spamandham
What makes you think they are not simply happening in your mind?
I don't see any distinction between soul and consciousness.
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
The objectivity of such experiences. Talking with a friend during the obe, and the next day confirming that he too was there...
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
The soul is a material thing. It has mass,
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
Consciousness has no mass, and is permanent.
Originally posted by spamandham
Do you know for certain that these OBEs were happening at the same time?
Presuming you and your friend did communicate in a shared OBE, how do you know this experience did not simply happen in your minds via an undiscovered communication mechanism?
Have you ever tried a documented experiment where you write down all the details you can about an OBE immediately after it happens (is induced?), and then study the notes later on to see if there's actually anything in the notes you could not have realistically simply just imagined?
How much mass?
Do you lose consciousness when you sleep? In what sense is it permanent?
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
These objective experiences include talking to a friend, and then confirming it the next day; going to a place you've never been before, and later on going there and seeing it looked exactly as it did in the obe, etc...
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
You do not lose consciousness when you sleep. What happens is that your consciousness is transferred from the physical body, and into the astral body. It is permanent in a sense that it will never cease to exist...
Originally posted by spamandham
This isn't sufficient evidence, because you could simply be experiencing false memories - a well documented phenomenon. This is why it would be important to document the experience immediately as soon as possible with as much detail as you can, including rough sketches if possible.
There are times during sleep when you are not even dreaming. Where is the consciousness at those times, if dreams are really just your memories from your consciousness in another domension? Further, how is it that we can measure dream states in the brain if a dream is happening in another dimension?
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
I am 100% sure that during obes I am in another dimension, not a mind-made reality. Therefore, documenting my experiences would serve no purpose to me, so it can only serve those who question the reality of obes.
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
It is thought that there are times during sleep where dreams do not occur. Yet this observation is not based on the observation of dreams, but the observation of the brain.
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
As I said in my last paragraph, the astral body can send messages to the physical. The "lack of dreams" that scientests refer to can also be the lack of messages between the astral and physical body.
Originally posted by spamandham
That certainly seems worthwhile to me. I see no difference between your 100% certainty and the 100% certainty of others who have perspectives inconsistent with yours. From my perspective, I dismiss them all not simply because they can't all be true, but because I have no reason to even suspect any of them might be true.
True, but these observations are becoming more compelling by the day. Even today we have new information regarding sleep and consciousness.
The other explanation is that consciousness and brain function are one in the same. During sleep, consciousness does in fact cease to exist, just as it ceases permanently at death. So far, I'm not seeing any reason to even suspect otherwise.
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
Sorry, I still cannot see the use for recording my out of body experiences immediately upon their happening. I do not need proof, as I am already certain of what they are. Can you explain what purpose they would serve to others?
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
We shall await the day when these observations can show absolute proof...
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
Hmmm... lucid dreams (which I assume you accept) seem to require consciousness. After all when we are in a lucid dream, we can make choices, think, and create our own reality. How can someone possibly make a choice if their consciousness ceases to exist?
Originally posted by spamandham
They would give me (and other skeptical bastards like me) explicit amo to shoot down your claims. Isn't that worthwhile?
No observations can ever provide absolute proof.
I'm not talking about dreams, I'm refering to the time periods between dreams, when you are not awake and you are not dreaming. If you require a more direct experience of non-consciousness, it can be induced with drugs. If you've ever been paralyzed for surgery, you know what I'm talking about.
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
No text can make myself believe my experiences were mind-made...
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
You mean time periods between brain activity. When you are not awake, and have no brain activity. The reason that you might not remember dreams that happen during this period could be that since there are no messages being sent from the astral body to the physical, the dreams are not as easily remembered...
Originally posted by cheeser
I saw a documentary a while back, it was on some american guy that got shot in the head in vietnam war, piercing his skull and going into his brain. he survived.. but the bullet must of hit and damaged some critical region in the mans brains responsible for understanding and inturpting speech. The man was just like any other normal guy, he just couldnt understand what anyone was saying..
Originally posted by spamandham
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
What do you mean by "natural" dimensions?
That which is potentially observed, or inferred from observation.
Originally posted by spamandham
Not even your own writing?
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
You mean time periods between brain activity. When you are not awake, and have no brain activity. The reason that you might not remember dreams that happen during this period could be that since there are no messages being sent from the astral body to the physical, the dreams are not as easily remembered...
Originally posted by spamandham
Why do you simply dismiss the obvious possibility that you simply have no consciousness during these periods? In fact there is brain activity during thee times as can be shown independently.
During sleep, consciousness does in fact cease to exist, just as it ceases permanently at death.
But suppose you're right, and there is an astral body out there that sends messages to your brain. If you are dependent on memory for identity, and the brain is the store of memory as you seem to be suggesting, how can you have any sense of identity once the brain and all its memories die?
It's amazing to me that people can convince themselves consciousness is outside the brain when there are so many cases such as this where people exhibit partial consciousness or loss of specific thinking abilities directly related to brain injuries. Everyone who believes in souls should study these cases.
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
Not even my own writing would change my views that were gained through experience. For all I know I could've written it during a hipnotic trance, at gunpoint, or while being posessed.
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
Actually I did not dismiss anything, I simply provided an alternative reason (read bolded print above) for the lack of brain activity that occurs in cycles during sleep. It was actually you that dismissed my view when you said...
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
while the soul, has mass, and can be detected.
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
I understand that all sensory perceptions, and motor and thinking skills are carried out through the brain. It is no surprise to me that people who have had brain injuries result with having partial loss of sensory perceptions,
Originally posted by spamandham
If that's the case, then how do you know your experiences are also not due to trance, or being posessed? It doesn't matter to me if you are too comfortable to challenge your beliefs. Seeking truth and seeking comfort are not always compatible.
I do dismiss your view. There are perhaps a boundless number of alternative explanations, all no more grounded than any other. Just because it's possible to come up with alternatives doesn't mean such alternatives should be given serious consideration. There has to be a reason for considering such alternatives.
How do you detect the soul? I asked you before how much mass a soul has, and you admitted you don't know.
Does this mass result in gravity?
They don't just lose perception. They often lose specific thinking skills, or even their sense of identity altogether.
Consciousness is not binary. There are degrees of consciousness.