Bone and Organs found near Bush Estate

Well, as one who spends a good deal of time in the field (when Im not goofing off on ATS), I run into all kinds of remains of sometimes unidentifiable animals all the time.

Considering that this site is out in the woods, I have no problem with the idea it could be animal in nature (although it would explain a lot more if they correctly identified it).

If I were to assume every bone I encountered in the field were a human rather than an animal (which I nearly always identify, but then someone who has only gotten as close as charging the pigeons in the DC park wouldnt know the first thing about recognizing the backbone of a bobcat...) I would have to assume that a thousand mass murderers were at work!

I agree with you DR, but the aritcle is both specific and vague. Also, there was only one wire report. It says bones that resemble a human's bone yet not which bone. I think from that we can deduce that if it was an animal, it must be a larger animal. I am not familiar with habitat and geography of Kennebunkport, so they very well could be animal bones and organs.

It just seems that I've seen this headline before. Haven't dead bodies popped up in Kennebunkport before?

I have, like d.r. had many accounts of finding animal carcasses while working. With no real medical experience, I would have a hard time telling the difference between a deer's rib cage and a adolescent human's. Still, it is possible that the remains could have been human and being so closed to the Kennedys, I'd probably called the cops too. Better to be sure I guess.

Well it looks like I get to answer my own question. The organ found was a 10 pound stomach and while a forensic anthropologist has not yet examined the stomach, appears to be from a cud-chewing animal. It seems the hurricane off-shore washed all sorts of stuff.

www.pressherald.com...

[Edited on 9-9-2003 by kukla]

Originally posted by kukla
The organ found was a 10 pound stomach and while a forensic anthropologist has not yet examined the stomach, appears to be from a cud-chewing animal.

[Edited on 9-9-2003 by kukla]

Well, now I am worried. Has anyone seen Ted Kennedy lately? Ah, what the hell am I saying, he's a great "swimmer".

Originally posted by Colonel
How many lies to I have to put up with here. Clinton NEVER committed TREASON like Bush and he didn't kill anybody. Sheesh.

I dunno, how many lies are you willing to spread? You fill the board with more than anyone, Esquire.

Again, let me remind you that these politically motivated lies and denials greatly slash into your credibility.

BTW, anyone have that list of suspicious "accidents" and "suicides" for our friend-in-denial, here, to read?

TC, where you been. I've missed you.

Yes Seekerof has been giving the Colonel history lessons in another thread. And doing a damn fine job of it.

Hey Colonel, how do you explain this one:

The Guy that wrote a 400 page report on the moon landing hoax died in a freak train crash. He was travelling to make a speech on the issue, he didn't make it, and neither did the report. He was the only one that died on the crash. O yea, and the report was in his bag, during the crash it disapeared.

So Colonel, If you can give me a logical explanation to how this went around.....I will be astonished. And about the legitity of what I said, I am sure other people in this thread can back me up.

Dude, I know nothing about that and had nothign to do with it so I can't comment.

Originally posted by Thomas Crowne

Originally posted by Colonel
How many lies to I have to put up with here. Clinton NEVER committed TREASON like Bush and he didn't kill anybody. Sheesh.

I dunno, how many lies are you willing to spread? You fill the board with more than anyone, Esquire.

Again, let me remind you that these politically motivated lies and denials greatly slash into your credibility.

BTW, anyone have that list of suspicious "accidents" and "suicides" for our friend-in-denial, here, to read?

I think you need to check out this thread before you attack my credibility.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Furthermore, you need to ask yourself:

1) Why weren't any planes scrambled when we were sure that we were being attacked?

2) Why were the fighters planes ordered to stand down?

3) Why was the investigation on who gained monetarily on the stock market stopped so suddenly?

4) Why did Bush allow the Family bin Laden and other nefarious Saudis to leave the country while Arabs were being rounded up across the country and all planes were grounded?

5) Why has Bush blocked at every pass deep investigation into the cause of 9-11?

6) Why did Cheney call Daschle and tell him to just do an investigation on the breakdown of our security apparatus on 9-11 as opposed to a full blown investigation into the breakdown, perps, and accomplices?


Why is that?

Colonel,

I posted a thread on Ron Brown

www.abovetopsecret.com...

for your perusal and enjoyment. I do invite your comments on it.

Yeah, I got the memo. I concede that there is a "conspiracy" there.