It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
No, I am just looking for the truth. Unfortunately I do not trust your interpetation of the facts. This little issue is a prime example of the situation.
let's just recap it shall we?
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Because what she is suggesting is a MASSIVE conspiracy to break federal, state and local laws, as well as to put hundreds, if not thousands of lives at risk.
A conspiracy that would involve just about everyone who works for Entergy, its subcontractors and vendors, State and federal safety inspectors, auditors, and regulators, local building inspectors, fire departments, etc. Literally hundreds of thousands of people would have to be in on this "plot" to store used fuel rods from the Waterford 3 power station in all of the places that she has implied that they are stored at.
----No imply that they were stored anywhere, just questions about specific sites and the possibility of the excess Waterford 3 spent fuel being stored elsewhere from the plant itself. Being that they started having overflow back in 98 if you remember back in this thread, they didn't have that much room when they were given the OK to increase production from the NRC.
The alternative explanation is that there is no "Environmental Devistation Coverup." There are no fuel rods that have been flooded. That the people who work for the State and federal agencies, Entergy, Norco, NASA, Michoud Air Products, etc are, by and large, ethical, moral people who are not criminals, who go to church, live next door to you, send their kids to the to the same schools as you do, and who would no more be involved in such an absurd conspiracy as you would be.
-----Nope it would actually only take a few top officials to know WHAT was in the facilities, as per the fact that Entergy Corp. went into NO first. All of the employees you just named above didn't necessarily have to "KNOW" anything. How many of those employees do you think actually do have access into the restricted Spent Fuel storage areas (at the Waterford 3 plant, as well as any "possible" independent storage facilities). The other top officials that would know would be those in charge of sending in the Entergy team, that took place once the Fed's got there right? Entergy and Bush sure do have a long history together
Furthermore, the conjectures that she has posted are not even remotely supported by the slightest shred of proof.
For instance: Entergy wants to handle and put out the fires related to broken gas lines.
Is that due to a conspiracy involving nuclear materials or just due to the fact that they are the gas company. What do you think?
-----------I think there are too many odd considences all around, including the fact that Entergy was the only ones allowed to deal with such fires and leaks at first. Shall we never question anything?
-------------You don't find it odd that FEMA Entergy and Bush rushed up to the Indian Point power plant before we had hardly even BEGAN the repair work in New Orleans. I think that about says it all....
---------------Why do you feel so threatened by questions? A massive coverup isn't possible huh? Do you own stock in Entergy by chance?
Originally posted by XGovGirl
Originally posted by HowardRoark
The alternative explanation is that there is no "Environmental Devistation Coverup." There are no fuel rods that have been flooded. That the people who work for the State and federal agencies, Entergy, Norco, NASA, Michoud Air Products, etc are, by and large, ethical, moral people who are not criminals, who go to church, live next door to you, send their kids to the to the same schools as you do, and who would no more be involved in such an absurd conspiracy as you would be.
Nope it would actually only take a few top officials to know WHAT was in the facilities, as per the fact that Entergy Corp. went into NO first. All of the employees you just named above didn't necessarily have to "KNOW" anything. How many of those employees do you think actually do have access into the restricted Spent Fuel storage areas (at the Waterford 3 plant, as well as any "possible" independent storage facilities). The other top officials that would know would be those in charge of sending in the Entergy team, that took place once the Fed's got there right? Entergy and Bush sure do have a long history together
Originally posted by XGovGirl
Everyone consider Three Mile Island:
Is there any proof that radioactive materials have been released as a result of the flooding in New Orleans?
Originally posted by XGovGirl
No actually I did address Howards questions IN CAPS, but removed them because I threw some other words in there that aren't appropriate. Just because you didn't see it doesn't mean Howard didn't.
I addressed his questions quiet well thank you.
Originally posted by XGovGirl
But just a re-cap because you're asking for it...
.