It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jessicamsa
Well, if the supposed threatening phone calls did occur, the government's response would be to put his tail between his legs and run away?? This does not look good for our country if the slightest threat can make our government officials cower away.
Since it's supposed to be against the law to make death threats, wouldn't the appropriate response be to carry on as usual while tracking down the one making the threats for prosecution at the same time?
It's interesting how word of these 'threats' have altered the course of this thread and left only a few still interested in having the important questions answered.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Its called political patronage, bush isn't immune from going along with it. He appointed them, he's the cheif executive, and they are failures and hacks. He screwed up, and the screw up rests on him. Its not his fault that the peopel of Louisiania and New Orleans in particular were silly enough to let the levees that protected their city from the gulf of mexico's waters, which they were under be substandard
Our fact-checking confirms that Bush indeed cut funding for projects specifically designed to strengthen levees. Indeed, local officials had been complaining about that for years.
www.factcheck.org...
Originally posted by Shuffleon
IF someone were going to enter an area of operations in which he REALLY wanted to leave an escape mechanism in place so that he could conveniently "self-extract" should it become expeditious for him to book on out at the drop of a hat, then that phone number "naively" placed into the post would be an EXCELLENT "out".
This begs the issue of just HOW "naive" a world class "spook" can possibly be. Personally I do NOT buy the idea that someone with his documented history, skills, and intelligence, could be THAT naive and "innocent of the ways of the 'net", and leave his number without realizing the potential for abuse.
Given the desirability of doing everything possible to AVOID driving the guy away, I am very skeptical of the alleged "death threats" being anything other than an excuse for bailing when it got too hot.
This is all conjecture and opinion ONLY, and I welcome alternative possible explanations that match the known facts.
Thank you and God bless you and your family. I wanted to open a dialogue with the good folks on the web site, however after receiving a number calls with "death threats" and "what a jerk profanity remarks" I abandoned the idea. Thanks for responding to me off list and God Bless and take care.
Why are you lying?
Originally posted by Valhall. Somewhere has outright stated I do believe on this thread but most definitely in a u2u to me that their intention - the goal of all this twisting and false accusations against me - is for me to recant my story.
By posting my response to your U2U.
Period. This member has stated outright that their desire is for me to say "No it really didn't happen. I made it all up...and/or I told a hyperbolic tale to... (and this is the almost verbatim accusations somewhere made) "foster the conspiratorial side of this board"."
I don't recall being invited, that entails a request not a directive. aside from which I fail to see how such invective whether by invite or by order is amenable to discourse.
And I have invited the member to do several things with themselves, but to leave me alone.
once again, another lie. After you had proclaimed publicly that you had ignored me, you sent me yet another U2U telling me that and I had better watch it or you would un-ignore me and warn me. Now how does your ignoring me make sense in the first place?
Hence the use of my ignore button on this member.
You read it anyway that is necessary to placate yourself. And since you will find no filth in either my posts or my U2U's but you readily admit to having engaged in same yourself, I ned say no more about your purpose as regard my unrefutable and concise rebuttals.
The member has proven they don't mind one bit attacking my integrity, attempting character assassination through inuendo, implying "nefarious intentions", or employing outright false accusations. Since they won't stop, I refuse to read their filth, and definitely won't be responding to it.
Originally posted by Shuffleon
This is all conjecture and opinion ONLY, and I welcome alternative possible explanations that match the known facts.
Originally posted by 27jd
Idiots who make death threats just for the hell of it, usually don't frequent intellectual websites, and are too drunk and stupid to even log on to a computer.
Originally posted by koji_K
You're joking, right?
Originally posted by edkostiuk
If I may break down the report that was posted about our facility as Falls Creek in Oklahoma.
Page 1 stated: I packed up two car loads of us and headed over to Falls Creek. In the Emergency Management Community we have asked the population over and over not to "self deploy" and the following reason are given for such request.
Prior to Jesse Jackson making his comments our Governor and the State Officer of Emergency Management asked all Oklahomans to please refrain from using words such as refugees and displaced people. We were asked to use the wording "Oklahoma Guest". This went out on the media here in Oklahoma and in print.
The author of this report continues to use the term refugee throughout the paper.
One of the primary reasons for using Falls Creek was the picturesque area and having the ability by faith-based groups to allow these folks the ability to put their lives back to normal, as much as possible, without having the press and lot’s of concerned citizens hound them for interviews and “how was it”.
We knew from the start that we needed additional security at the site so Oklahoma Highway Patrol officers were assigned in double shifts to protect those “guest” from the media and other “well concerned citizens”.
She states her daughter “turned and snapped a picture of his vehicle (Page 5)—very conspicuously”. There was no reason for some James Bond type of picture taking OHP officers are very friendly and will allow their photo’s and that of their cruisers to be taken.
The reason (page 7) for not allowing clothes was the fact we need to ensure they are clean and in good order. We have over the years at disasters received soiled and dirty diapers, ripped clothes and other related items by well meaning citizens. We now have retired ladies who help us select clothes that can be used by these folks. I have photos’ of thousands of clothes at Fall Creek that were standing by ready to be delivered to these folks.
(Page 8) The occupants of the camp cannot leave the camp for any reason. That is true once they were placed on the busses we had no way to determine their medical status. They have been exposed to several elements and prior to allowing them off camp we wanted to have them checked out by the Doctors and Nurses we had lined up at Falls Creek (Page 15 the people in the blue jump suits). We also had 22 ambulances standing by for medical emergencies. We had a similar camp in Northern Oklahoma and had 4 medical emergencies the night these good folks arrived and they needed immediate transport to a local hospital. Many of these US Citizens arrived with pre-existing medical conditions.
The reason your “pop-tarts” were accepted is they are sealed in an enclosed package and are “tamper proof”. We are trying to protect our Louisiana friends from the criminal element and bad people that might want harm done to them. This is the reason Apples and Oranges were not allowed. I wonder if this lady allowed her children to go around on Thanksgiving and accept open candy from strangers.
Oklahoma never had the intention of accepting 5,000 guests (page 9) as she stated. Our cap and the cap that our governor worked out was 3,000 at falls creek. This is the maximum number of meals, toys, clothes and other related things that needed to be in place prior to our guest arriving.
The Cell phones were put in place by our Office of Emergency Management due to a request of our emergency workers since cell phone coverage is so poor. Cingular and others donated the towers and equipment including the coverage. We also place these cell towers at Falls Creek so once the people were on their feet they could start calling loved ones throughout the country and inform them they were OK.
The toys she refers to must first be checked. We have had “Christian groups” donate toys such as swords, toy guns and other devices that usually mean harm donated to our causes over the years so we check them closely before allowing any kids to play with them.
The meals were going to be provided by the American Red Cross and the Salvation Army. We at the Health Department were requiring that they eat hot food with plenty of vegetables not the “junk food” that this lady stated she was brining. Snacks were to be laid out during the day and night for their use, but meals which included the basic food groups were required 3 times a day.
Mod Edit: Removed phone number
Ed Kostiuk
Oklahoma State Dept of Health
Emergency Management
[edit on 12-9-2005 by ZeddicusZulZorander]
Originally posted by 39 drops of solder
Being a member of Above Top Secret, which if it had its ultimate way, they (the membership) and I would overthrow the United States Government according to the United States Declaration of Independence. Whether it be a judicial, educational and/or physical overthrow.
Originally posted by Valhall
Originally posted by 39 drops of solder
Being a member of Above Top Secret, which if it had its ultimate way, they (the membership) and I would overthrow the United States Government according to the United States Declaration of Independence. Whether it be a judicial, educational and/or physical overthrow.
Where the heck are you living? Speak for yourself solder-pool because you are not speaking for this member. I assure you.