It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Nygdan
[Thats intersting, I hadnt' realized that it required that much electricity!
Originally posted by Phate87
LoL !!
It's always a blast to see how unbelievable arrogant some americans are ......
as a matter of fact, if it wouldn't have been fore Einstein(oh a german ...)
u would have never knew about the attempts to build a nucleaer bomb and u would never have built the first one.
Originally posted by Phate87
Hmm u might wanna read my text carefull i'll give u a hint , read the word choice carefully in your quote of me
No Einstein --> no letter to the president --> no knowledge of the attempts of the Nazis to build a nuclear bomb -->
ur Atomicbomb project wouldn't have started to cranck it up or even start()
i'm not sure if there already was a project to build an a-bomb but it definitly would have taken u longer than the germans)
therefore my point is proven.
All that is backuped by an american 2 World Wars teacher ;-)
Originally posted by Lonestar24
Another point hasnt been mentioned so far. Germany for one has no means of delivering a nuclear warhead, maybe apart from specific Tornado versions. Creating a nuke would be a minor problem, given the overall technical niveau in Germany and considering its among-the-top nuclear technology. But a reliable delivery method like an ICBM or cruise missile cant be pulled out of a hat.
Apart from that, though the German military does not "suffer" from extremely strict regulations like the japanese forces, it is still defined to be a homeland security force, and only to be deployed abroad on internationally approved peacekeeping missions (approved by NATO, UN or EU - the real reason why Germany would not have been part of the Iraq coalition anyway).
Because of that, a nuke would not fit into the first rule of defending the motherland: There is virtually no single place in Germany that could be nuked without directly harming the population, because none of the "big" countries is as densely populated as Germany. So if a weapon disqualifies as a defensive instrument, it will not be developed.
And on another note: even in an emergency, even IF a threat like the former Soviet Union would stand at the borders, the citizens of Germany would not approve of a nuclear arms development. This country is so restricitve and hostile against all domestic forms of nuclear technology use that it is the only of the G8 countries that already decided on a timetable to withdraw from nuclear energy. Even radioactive Tritium night sights for weapons are forbidden there.
And Locutus, just because the American forces in Germany have Nuclear armament, that doesnt lead to "Germany having nukes" as you stated. The Allied military sites are property of the respective miltaries, and technically not part of Germany in a similar way like embassies. No US commander with a nuclear arsenal would ever let a German, Italian or Brit play around with US toys.
Originally posted by UK_05_XM29
Germany is more than capable of developing nuclear weapons so why havn't they got any yet? Even South Africa has developed them.
Originally posted by American Madman
Originally posted by UK_05_XM29
Germany is more than capable of developing nuclear weapons so why havn't they got any yet? Even South Africa has developed them.
Hmm good question....
Well Let's see. Oh yeah they started two worlds wars within three decades... I think its more a matter of big brother saying "no you CAN'T have those".
Well that and they lease US nukes Germanys has them but the US controls them.
Originally posted by Lonestar24
Well that and they lease US nukes Germanys has them but the US controls them.
No they aren´t "leased". They are stationed under the offiicial NATO "Nuclear sharing" program. And yes, the US controls them and their codes in peacetime, but they were specifically and officially intended to be given to german control and use in case of war.
Anyway this time is nearing its end "through the back door". Though neither Germany nor the USA seem to be willing to make the first step to dismantle the remaining arsenl of ~500 weapons, their time WILL end when Germany phases out the Panavia Tornados. These planes are the last modern nuclear delivery system Germany has, since the Typhoon has no nuclear capability.
Originally posted by St Udio
i was under the impression that this ordinance were not nuclear bombs/weapons
but were termed 'atomic demolitions'
and they were housed in 'conex-containers'
which made the delivery method either a 'Duce-&-1/2' truck or another US or German military vehicle...i.e. aircraft or missiles were never figured to be delivery systems for those NATO sponsered atomic demolition munitions in W.Germany
i would be floored if this program still existed in any form,
especially after many of the former east european soviet bloc has joined the EU and even NATO...and the threat of overwhelming soviet attack doesn't exist now.
Originally posted by northwolf
American Madman
How hard is it to understand that Germany didn't start WW1 it only stepped in because of a treaty with Austro-Hungarians.
Originally posted by Phate87
Hmm u might wanna read my text carefull i'll give u a hint , read the word choice carefully in your quote of me
No Einstein --> no letter to the president --> no knowledge of the attempts of the Nazis to build a nuclear bomb --> ur Atomicbomb project wouldn't have started to cranck it up or even start( i'm not sure if there already was a project to build an a-bomb but it definitly would have taken u longer than the germans)
therefore my point is proven.
All that is backuped by an american 2 World Wars teacher ;-)