It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Frosty
a) you have no links or sources
Originally posted by ResinLA
Haven't you people seen the video of a ball of flying flying over a field, then in a matter of 2 seconds a complex crop circle is formed directly beneath it? If you saw that video, you wouldn't wonder if crop circles were man made or not!
Conclusions
From a technical viewpoint, the video is very well made. The movement of the balls of light is very 'fluid' and smooth. The action appears to take place in real-time and it looks impressive. However, when subjected to scrutiny and technical analysis, major flaws start to appear. I am personally convinced that it is a hoax.
Originally posted by helium3
Originally posted by Frosty
a) you have no links or sources
So is everything a hoax to proven real ? So life is a hoax ? Can you prove it real ?. Ill be the first to admit the basic looking ones are just drunk farmers having fun at nigth....BUT the more complex ones PLEASE EXPLAIN ?
Originally posted by meshuggah1324
I'd say the high levels of radiation found inside some crop circles, and the odd ways the stems are bent over and mutilated from some kind of energy source show that not all crop circles are made by men with rope and wooden planks.
Originally posted by toasted
would frosty be a hoax, if monkeys flew out of his butt ?
would we believe him ? [ if he claimed it ]
how could he prove it ?
Originally posted by Frosty
a) you have no links or sources b) only when monkeys fly out my butt will they be anything but hoaxes
Originally posted by gps777
1.The guy holding the meter was too far from the camera for the viewer to see his claim that its affected by radiation only when inside the circle,though he was saying see! see! and no sorry we could`nt see.
2.As far as the supposed authentic crop circles go referring to the base is always bent not broken.HOW easy would it be for them to prove that right at the site for us to see.All they had to do was walk ten feet to undisturbed crop and bend it for us.
3.The guys who were claiming to be professional crop circle analysts seemed like con artists and one who claimed he was a professor struck me as an off spring from what you would get from an incest relation by the nutty proffessor.
Well that was my opinion of it anyway and i want to keep an open mind when it comes to these crop circles,these guys did`nt do their cause any good.
Originally posted by Whiterabbit29
1) At no time in my posts have I mentioned radiation or the equipment used to measure it! The equipment mentioned was sound recording equipment being used for the simple reason of recording an interview the phenomenon I mentioned was noticed during this process!
2) It did show close up photo's of the bent over stalks in the documentary!
3) Without seeing there qualifications first hand I have no way of knowing if they are qualified scientists or not, but I would say this goes for any scientist, I have never seen any of them get there degrees out for everyone to see before they go of into explaining a subject. I'm also not sure what someones appearance has to do with in regards to how intelligent they are or what qualifications they have. Also it did show photo's taken from a electron microscope that showed what I explained!
Originally posted by helium3
Frosty, unless these artist are from Chernobyl how do you explain the radiation left behind
[edit on 9-9-2005 by helium3]
Originally posted by optimus fett
ive got to admit.....i saw some recent crop circles in a paper recentley and i couldnt help think how amazingly intricate and detailed they were, they also spanned a huge 1000metre+ radius, even if i was given a million£ and a year, i know i couldnt produce something like that in a night, i couldnt even do it on a design programme.
This truly is an amazing thing and blows my mind.