It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
claim 1 ) the plane flown into the WTC was a windoless cargo plane
question 1 ) where did the plane that departed logan and the passengers go
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
claim 2 ) the plane fired a missile prior to impact
question 2 ) why ????????????
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
question 2b ) how ????????????
Originally posted by ignorant_apeclaim 3 ) the towers were " wired to drop " with dems charges
question 3 ) how did these mythical set of charges maintain cohesion druing the impact and fire , with no loss of integrity in any circuit
given that the exact impact point / pattern of damage could not be predicted
how they wired the building is an even siller claim thats covered by others , so i will leave it for now
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
PS i would love to have seen the look on the face of the engineer who was morally challenged enough to agree to wire the WTC with explosives when they told him that his charges would have to survive a missile , plane and fire of unpredictable nature
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
the recent allegations / counter allegations regarding the " flash " prior to impacts at the WTC have set me thinking
the conspiracists allege that this flash was a missile launch
look at ANY video of the collapse , in both towers the collapse starts within the fire , ergo the " mythical explosives " must have been robust enough to survive the crash / missile / fire
Originally posted by Rikimaru
I dont and never have subscribed to any 'conspiracy' on 9/11, way too much circumstanial if, suppose, etc.
Originally posted by Jake the Dog Man
This section shows that you know NOTHING about demolition, NOTHING about physics OR NOTHING about how the WTCs were constructed unlike any other buildings.
Again, still waiting on some PROOF…
Originally posted by Jake the Dog Man
The "explosions" are not proven, nor plausible. How does one explain something DIDNT happen?
Shattering/Compression/Pressure can explain anything you have seen on any of the films. Check out the Collapse thread for plenty of explainations, though most go unheard just to have a conspiracy.
Again, don't get angry at me because you don't want to hear something. From now on, ignore me as you ignore others with a diffence in opinion.
So you will base an entire conspiracy theory on some puffs of particulate/stressed concrete during the collapse of two of the tallest buildings on the planet after being struck by airplanes filled with jet fuel?
In trying to come to terms with what actually happened during the collapse of the World Trade Towers, the biggest and most obvious problem that I see is the source of the enormous amount of very fine dust that was generated during the collapses. Even early on, when the tops of the buildings have barely started to move, we see this characteristic fine dust (mixed with larger chunks of debris) being shot out very energetically from the building. During the first few seconds of a gravitational fall nothing is moving very fast, and yet from the outset what appears to be powdered concrete can be seem blowing out to the sides, growing to an immense dust cloud as the collapse progresses.
The floors themselves are quite robust. Each one is 39" thick; the top 4" is a poured concrete slab, with interlocking vertical steel trusses (or spandrel members) underneath. This steel would absorb a lot of kinetic energy by crumpling as one floor fell onto another, at most pulverizing a small amount of concrete where the narrow edges of the trusses strike the floor below. And yet we see a very fine dust being blown very energetically out to the sides as if the entire mass of concrete (about 400,000 cubic yards for the whole building) were being converted to dust. Remember too that the tower fell at almost the speed of a gravitational free-fall, meaning that little energy was expended doing anything other than accelerating the floor slabs.
Considering the amount of concrete in a single floor (~1 acre x 4") and the chemical bond energy to be overcome in order to reduce it to a fine powder, it appears that a very large energy input would be needed. The only source for this, excluding for now external inputs or explosives, is the gravitational potential energy of the building. Any extraction of this energy for the disaggregation of the concrete would decrease the amount available for conversion to kinetic energy, slowing the speed of the falls. Yet we know that the buildings actually fell in about 9 seconds, only slightly less than an unimpeded free-fall from the same height. This means that very little of the gravitational energy can have gone toward pulverizing the concrete.
Even beyond the question of the energy needed, what possible mechanism exists for pulverizing these vast sheets of concrete? Remember that dust begins to appear in quantity in the very earliest stages of the collapses, when nothing is moving fast relative to anything else in the structure. How then is reinforced concrete turned into dust and ejected laterally from the building at high speed?
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
claim 3 ) the towers were " wired to drop " with dems charges
question 3 ) how did these mythical set of charges maintain cohesion druing the impact and fire , with no loss of integrity in any circuit
given that the exact impact point / pattern of damage could not be predicted
how they wired the building is an even siller claim thats covered by others , so i will leave it for now
[edit on 4-9-2005 by RANT]
Originally posted by TheShroudOfMemphis
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
claim 3 ) the towers were " wired to drop " with dems charges
question 3 ) how did these mythical set of charges maintain cohesion druing the impact and fire , with no loss of integrity in any circuit
given that the exact impact point / pattern of damage could not be predicted
how they wired the building is an even siller claim thats covered by others , so i will leave it for now
[edit on 4-9-2005 by RANT]
The wires were non-existant, partially.
The charges would be placed in 'groups', similar to how your Christmas lighting works. If one goes out, it doesn't take out the entire circuit, sometimes it will take none out, sometimes it will take 5 out (for example), depending on their setup, limitations, needs etc.
Each grouping would be set per designated floor and would have wireless contact with the 'base' located in WTC 7. Theoretically, the base could be in Vans on the street which look like News Vans or which are windowless and can rove while being conducted from WTC 7 up until demolition. The system would be like a switchboard which would tell the user which charges are functional and which are not, by using a relay signal. When that relay signal stops being returned, the user knows they have lost either a group, or a single detonation, depending on the set-up they have used. They would most likely have lost some at the impact areas, most likely this would of been assumed also. The planes were heading toward a GPS location and their impact would of been known within a area of floor coverage already worked out in advance. CAD models of the WTC would of been made to work out detonation position and affect to cut down on installation time. It would be entirely worked out and mapped out before anyone even stepped foot into the building with a charge in their hands.
When you've set groups at each floor of the building on a set number of floors, (going off calculations which determine the weight of the floors falling above it as to which floors will be most critical in removing as per your CAD model) you can then monitor their 'status' and initiate them in sequence as the floors fall.
There would need to be more than one 'type' of charge for different results but this also would limit the need for thousands of charges and miles of cable. Remember, we are talking about the most advanced technology and largest budget available to create these means. Don't expect your local demolition team to be using government developed, pre-fabed equipment designed for a specific purpose:
1. Point Of Impact: There would be few main charges around the point of impact which start the collapsing process after No.4.
2. Floor Resistance: There would be charges placed at the corners and the core connections on certain floors. They would be designed to shatter the steel beems as the rubble above falls on them, removing resistance.
3. Cutters: There would also be charges which are designed to 'cut' certain critical connections before the collapse reaches that area of the building. This will help remove resistance and also remove the need for 'thousands' of explosives.
4. The Core: There would also be a MAJOR bomb in each Core which is designed to remove the Core foundation and also help in removing resistance, allowing for the buildings weight to help the collapse.
Each set of charges would be monitored by a different person(s) who would call their sequence as it was happening and charges would be detonated in sequence.
Major bombs go off at the core as the planes impact and everyone is watching the fire ball. At the area of point of impact, after the WTC cores condition has been established, explosions at the area of point of impact occurs which starts the process, everyone is either running or watching the rubble fall, this distraction allows for cutting explosions below the implosion to occur generally un-noticed, apart from a few inconsistancies which formed 'squibs'. Lastly, the floor explosions would be going off as the rubble reaches them. As this 'dance' is taking place, the demolition team would have a complete montoring system of the WTC, with each floor marked out, each charge marked out on a computer. As the collapse occurs, the charges are let off in a pre-determined sequence via calls to the 'button pushers' as their section is lit up. This would be choreographed easily, they would not need an actual visual of the building, thou no doubt they would of anyway. The relay signal from the charges would tell them their status. If enough calculations were done prior, they may even have set the explosions to go off via an automated system once they triggered the intial collapse procedure.
This all happens in 9 to 11 seconds, creates a visual which is as thou the building fell in on itself and the weight of the building brought itself down. While that is partially true, it only occured because of help in removing the resistance it would of surely met and would otherwise have only partially collapsed the building or had the top topple over, leaving the rest standing.
Control this detonation from WTC 7 for the wireless range, don't worry thou, you'll be safe:
But we'll demolish the building later on so theres no evidence left behind.
(in case you don't know who used WTC 7, check this link:
www.whatreallyhappened.com... )
Now read up on explosive technology, the government have it's own department dedicated to this.... i mean, they are at war aren't they?!
Wireless technology is actually 200 years old!
wireless.itworld.com...
The government would have a fair grasp of that don't you think? Even in Iraq they can create IEDs with 5km detonation radius on the fly, i'm sure the Pentagon would be more advanced than an insurgent right?
www.strategypage.com...
I'm sure the government could create a series of wireless detonations, it would be much easier than using wires, a lot less would be involved, it can be controlled digitally and can be monitored by software.
Oh and if you live in that area, why not join the federal governments 20-year study to find out if there's any health risks for living in NY since 9/11! Find out in 20 years if your sick!
www.nyc.gov...
[edit on 6-9-2005 by TheShroudOfMemphis]