It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by curme
TC, isn't the very nature of our constitution that of a living, breathing, document? One that changes with the mores of the country it represents? I mean, it was written exclusively for white men. It slowly changed, was interpreted, to include women and people of color, as our country changed to no longer look upon them as property.
Couldn't the 2nd amendment be another antiquated and quaint idea that needs a modern interpretation?
Originally posted by Astronomer68
Didn't do much good though, did it?
Originally posted by orangetom1999
Why Tinkleflower have you not known about this and have only the standard party line.???? I would like to know this and I am very curious as to why this is so???
Originally posted by Amethyst
I can't believe the anti-gun people screaming that guns kill a lot of kids. Didn't they know that swimming pools are more dangerous?
Now take Switzerland. I think you're required to have a gun in your household; at any rate, I think just about everyone there has a gun. And the crime rate is very low.
I'd like to see the anti-gun crowd explain that one.
Originally posted by orangetom1999
Thank you for clarifying my question. I did not know that you are English.
Originally posted by orangetom1999
Also the poster who followed you Tinkeflower...I dont think firearms ownership is why Hitlers Forces did not invade Switzerland. But that would be another story.
Thanks,
Orangetom
Originally posted by Astronomer68
TC I stipulate the confederacy was more than a loose confederacy of the states, but the articles clearly intended for the various states to be the fount of law, except for interstate and international matters. Why else would they so clearly state that the federal government would only have those rights and powers specifically granteed to it in the constitution. The drafters/adopters were afraid of a centralized government and went out of their way to curtail it's powers.
Didn't do much good though, did it?
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
No, you didn't read every post, and yes, it has been stated, and no, political statements are not allowed in ATS. Take your politics to PTS, our sister board.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
I'll speak slowly for you:
Y e s, i t w a s co v e r e d !
Try a bit of sacrasm when you aren't wrong six ways from Sunday, Pal.
...
here at ATS!