It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Javier Solana, the EU's foreign policy chief, said that its members would provide whatever assistance was requested by the US.
US consumers are having to get used to spending more to fill up
"Whatever they ask for they will be given, from reserves of oil that different countries have provided, to any other thing they may need," he said.
BBC
In contrast, British foreign secretary Jack Straw said that EU members would focus on providing humanitarian aid and that the use of their petroleum reserves was "not in people's minds".
A host of other nations have offered assistance including Venezuela, the world's fifth largest oil producer and a staunch critic of US foreign policy, which has offered to provide cheap fuel.
Originally posted by worldwatcher
this is good news for the short term, but where is this crude going to be refined at? are the operational refineries capable of handling the nation's gasoline consumption?
Originally posted by stumason
I think this is where language differences occur. To us, at least in the UK, petroleum is an already refined product, like your "Gas", hence us Brits calling fuel "Petrol".
Originally posted by Rikimaru
Originally posted by stumason
I think this is where language differences occur. To us, at least in the UK, petroleum is an already refined product, like your "Gas", hence us Brits calling fuel "Petrol".
Hmmm, I thought it was because the british had to be different in someway
Originally posted by worldwatcher
this is good news for the short term, but where is this crude going to be refined at? are the operational refineries capable of handling the nation's gasoline consumption?
Originally posted by subz
Im sorry but shouldnt we ship our oil reserves to the United States after their own strategic reserve is empty? Why should we get rid of ours while they still have theirs? Im all for helping out with humanitarian aid but this just seems like stupidty to me. What are we going to do when we have a major disaster?
Originally posted by subz
Im sorry but shouldnt we ship our oil reserves to the United States after their own strategic reserve is empty? Why should we get rid of ours while they still have theirs? Im all for helping out with humanitarian aid but this just seems like stupidty to me. What are we going to do when we have a major disaster?
And Rikimaru, its not us who change words just to be different, it is our language after all.
Originally posted by subz
What are we going to do when we have a major disaster?
Originally posted by junglejake
Because Americans have been Johnny On The Spot in times of need for other countries without asking questions. We donated like mad for the tsunami in the pacific rim, and we didn't demand that the individual governments go broke before they could get any money to help people.
Originally posted by junglejake
Also, the strategic oil reserves ar unrefined oil. They're there in the event of a war, and we don't know how we'd need it. So, we keep it unrefined to be flexible. From what I've gathered from this article and others posts, it sounds like it's processed "petrol" that is being sent, what we desperatly need.
From the original news story
But European oil will take at least 10 days to reach U.S. shores and tanker space is in short supply with many commercial ships already under charter and crossing the Atlantic.
Originally posted by yadboy
Two great points Subz. A lot of people here in the US seem to forget that the UK was here first.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Maybe the US will lease you part of iraq for a few decades and you can use that.