It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by breano
This is something which has niggled at my mind for some time now.
I often wonder if modern day man may in fact be a hybrid species of Grey Aliens and ancient ape men.
Its just that I think if you took half the DNA of a Grey and half the DNA of a great ape and created a being you would more than likely end up with something very much like a modern human.
In general terms we probably half way between the two in terms of strengh, intelligence and looks !
Just a wee theory thats been spinning around in my head for a while - whats others thoughts on the possibility ?
Originally posted by breano
This is something which has niggled at my mind for some time now.
I often wonder if modern day man may in fact be a hybrid species of Grey Aliens and ancient ape men.
Its just that I think if you took half the DNA of a Grey and half the DNA of a great ape and created a being you would more than likely end up with something very much like a modern human.
In general terms we probably half way between the two in terms of strengh, intelligence and looks !
Just a wee theory thats been spinning around in my head for a while - whats others thoughts on the possibility ?
the children of the heavens, saw and lusted after them, and said to one another:
“Come, let us chose us wives from among the children of men and beget us children.”
03.
And Semjaza, who was their leader, said unto them:
“I fear ye will not indeed agree to do this deed,
and I alone shall have to pay the penalty of a great sin.”
04.
And they all answered him and said:
“Let us all swear an oath, and all bind ourselves by mutual imprecations
not to abandon this plan but to do this thing.”
05.
Then sware they all together and bound themselves together by mutual imprecations upon it.
06.
And they were in all two hundred;
who descended in the days of Jared on the summit of Mount Hermon, and they called it Mount Hermon,
because they had sworn and bound themselves by mutual imprecations upon it.
07.
And these are the names of their leaders:
Semiazaz, their leader,
Arakiba,
Rameel,
Kokabiel,
Tamiel,
Ramiel,
Danel,
Ezeqeel,
Baraqijal,
Asael,
Armaros,
Batarel,
Ananel,
Zaqiel,
Samsapeel,
Satarel,
Turel,
Jomael,
Sariel.
08.
These are their chiefs of tens.
Chapter 7.
01.
And all the others together with them took unto themselves wives,
and each chose for himself one,
and they began to go in unto them and defile themselves with them,
and they taught them charms and enchantment’s,
and the cutting of roots, and made them acquainted with plants.
02.
And they became pregnant, and they bare great giants,
whose height was Three Thousand Ells:
03.
Who consumed all the acquisitions of men.
And when men could no longer sustain them,
04.
The giants turned against them and devoured mankind.
05.
And they began to sin against birds, and beasts, and reptiles, and fish,
and to devour one an others flesh, and drink the blood.
Originally posted by davesidious
reply to post by JohnPhoenix
I've got news for you - you ARE an ape. All humans are apes. Your DNA is almost identical to other apes, chimpanzees especially, because we share a close ancestor. That is not up for debate - the evidence is there. Evolution is called a theory, as the word 'theory' has a different meaning in science. It doesn't mean 'guess', as it does in normal casual usage, but 'demonstrated and not contradicted by every observation ever made'. To equate it to a common theory is ridiculous. What we call theories in casual language are called 'hypotheses' in scientific terms. The theory of evolution stopped being a hypotheses hundreds of years ago.
If you want to stick your fingers in your ears and pretend that's not the case, then please go ahead. The only person you'll be hurting is yourself. You really make yourself look a bit foolish when you say things like that, as evolution isn't a controversial aspect of science - it's well documented, well understood, very simple, and extremely elegant. It's oh so easy to understand, should you not have any barriers *cough* religion *cough* poor education *cough* to not do so. I'm not attacking you - I only wish to help.
Saying you don't believe in evolution is like saying you don't believe in gravity or electricity. You can say that if you want, but don't be surprised when people laugh.
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
Originally posted by davesidious
reply to post by JohnPhoenix
I've got news for you - you ARE an ape. All humans are apes. Your DNA is almost identical to other apes, chimpanzees especially, because we share a close ancestor. That is not up for debate - the evidence is there. Evolution is called a theory, as the word 'theory' has a different meaning in science. It doesn't mean 'guess', as it does in normal casual usage, but 'demonstrated and not contradicted by every observation ever made'. To equate it to a common theory is ridiculous. What we call theories in casual language are called 'hypotheses' in scientific terms. The theory of evolution stopped being a hypotheses hundreds of years ago.
If you want to stick your fingers in your ears and pretend that's not the case, then please go ahead. The only person you'll be hurting is yourself. You really make yourself look a bit foolish when you say things like that, as evolution isn't a controversial aspect of science - it's well documented, well understood, very simple, and extremely elegant. It's oh so easy to understand, should you not have any barriers *cough* religion *cough* poor education *cough* to not do so. I'm not attacking you - I only wish to help.
Saying you don't believe in evolution is like saying you don't believe in gravity or electricity. You can say that if you want, but don't be surprised when people laugh.
Your argument is 100% Bunk. There is no 100% proof we came from Apes no matter how much DNA we share. All your argument is only what you choose to believe.
Science has never demonstrated 100% Proof that man came from Apes. It's a popular belief, but the hard core science for Proof is not there.
You wanna stick your fingers in your ears and not listen to the scientist? Even the scientist who study all the data and give us this theory will not claim it is 100% conclusive proof.
[edit on 12-12-2009 by JohnPhoenix]
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
reply to post by davesidious
And MASLO that goes for you too.. When even the scientists will say this is not 100% conclusive proof, why do you persist? This is laughable people.
[edit on 13-12-2009 by JohnPhoenix]
Originally posted by Maslo
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
reply to post by davesidious
And MASLO that goes for you too.. When even the scientists will say this is not 100% conclusive proof, why do you persist? This is laughable people.
[edit on 13-12-2009 by JohnPhoenix]
All right. For me, mountains of evidence from different science fields and absence of evidence to the contrary is 100 % proof. Conclusive enough for me. What would you need?