It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Were we created, or did we create the theory of creation because we were confused and unable to explain our own existence?
Originally posted by UM_Gazz
I believe that science offers the best explanation for our human existence in this world. The theory of Creation seems to be a matter of faith.
We as humans, who have such amazing abilities, talents and knowledge of our own world, and can look at our massive universe to solve even more mysteries. You are looking at a screen created by humans.. Connected to a computer, accessed the internet.. And are able to comprehend what you are reading now. Think of all the things you can do.. Imagine all of the possibilities and ponder your own existence. We can fly! Explore space! And create technologies that can be far more advanced than our ancestors could have ever dreamed! However they did, for it was their imagination, skills and Brain Power that helped us get to where we are today... Right?
Science tells us that we evolved from primitive apes starting some 2 Million years ago. Biblical creation tells us we were created by a super being or God some 10,000 years ago. What does logic tell YOU?
How is it that we can communicate as we do? Why are we able to understand our human condition, life, death, and all between? Why to we have such a strong desire to learn more?
Are we human or are we animals? .. Or perhaps something else?
Were we created, or did we create the theory of creation because we were confused and unable to explain our own existence?
No other animal on this planet can do the things we can
?
Chimps use tools, many animals have a primitive sort of language, and lots of animals 'play' and seem to genuinely experience a joi de vive. And famously chimps and other primates will savagely murder one another, even have near genocidal wars with other 'tribes' over not very much. Interstingly, its been observed that some chimps have a ritualistic tribal dance, with members of a group dancing, with footsteps in rythm (not simply walking along), and often this occurs around a large pole/tree, which is all very similar to the ancient tribal dances that are out there.
THere's nothing like humans, but then again, there's nothin quite like chimps, reptiles, dogs, etc either. The differences between man and animal are largely a difference of degree, not a difference of type.
What if they found a way to combine some of their own genetic material with that of primitive mankind, and were successful?
I'd think that there'd be evidence for it, and also it seems extremely unlikely that aliens from another planet, assuming that they exist and come here, will have a genetics that can 'match' with that of genetics on earth. They'd have to use DNA, which is not a given, and they'd also have to have the same genetic code (the code is what codon (a set of three a, c, g, etc) 'means' what amino acid, and thus permits proteins to be built).
Even given that tho, I'd think that we'd find evidence for non-terrestrial genes in man. Chimps and man share a lot of genetic information, and the stuff thats different doesn't bear evidence of being of alien manufacture.
This doesn't mean that these things didn't happen, but we have to be very careful about saying that they did when we don't have eivdence for it.
? Could they have been feeding us technologies through time? Seeing how we learn from it?
Human technology seems to have progressed rather normally, sometimes quickly, undoubtedly, but there aren't, so far as I know, any 'gaps' that would indicate outside influence was needed.
mizar
We are lucky our oldest ancestors were not over run by other species
Every living species is equally lucky, by definition. None of the species alive today have any 'extinctions' in their lines.
Humanity is just almost too perfect
Humans seem pretty darned imperfect. They loose vision, grow cancer, their skin gets all wrinkly, they die, they get sick easily, they have vestigial organs, etc etc. Don't seem anything close to perfect. They're not very different, anatomically, from chimps.
Why were we so lucky to gain a larger brain?
Why do you consider it 'lucky'? Most people appreciate having a brain, but the animals that have underdeveloped brains aren't terribly off.
why did primitive man have such a big brain and thinking capacity if it was never to be used;
Primitive man used his brain every bit as much as modern man.
But science tells us that it is simply something that had to happen.
Science does not say this. Things ended up happenign the way they did, it wasn't destined. Selection pressures for walking up-right and having a larger brain were applied to the primitive ancestors of man. Thats about it.
Originally posted by evilfrog16
evolutions a load of crap
Originally posted by shihulud
Evolution may have a scientific basis but it still doesn't adequately explain many aspects of human existence.
G
Originally posted by miss_terry
First and foremost I believe there is some kind of divine power/energy something much greater than mankind.
Originally posted by miss_terry
The God I believe in is a, forgiving and just God, I see this all around me, it could be when I watch an American fire fighter risk his own life by swimming into a flooded river to save a young child or when a local girl in my town sacrifices her spare time to help disabled kids.
Originally posted by miss_terry
Where does Evolution fit in?
Scientists can tell us a lot but what they cannot do is “create life” from chemicals alone. For me it was God/energy who created the “spark” and through the beautiful process of Evolution we are here. Not by some 7 day magical extravaganza.
Originally posted by miss_terry
Actually what does this make me an evoltionist or a ID'er, hmmm