It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Coordinated attacks on 9/11 anneversery

page: 3
0
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 31 2003 @ 09:48 PM
link   
heres my two cents. we (as "infedel") are never going to see the end of this until we are all dead!



posted on Aug, 31 2003 @ 09:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by The Blade Runner
no your comment has nothing to do with it. i just think it wouldnt be advisable to be in major uk citys in the next 6 month...


a uk city? try living next to #ing UNITED STATES STATEGIC COMMAND. i know i have a bunch of russian missles pointed at me too



posted on Aug, 31 2003 @ 10:10 PM
link   
Bin Laden planning 'unbelievable attack'.
Apparently all arranged at a cosy conference in April. Biological arms are quoted as the weapon of choice.

www.sky.com...

Wither any of this has any substance or if it�s just the next round of anxiety building propaganda is anyone�s guess. Wait and see unfortunately seems to be the only available option. I severely doubt anything would be planned for 9/11 this year as everybody would be on alert for that, but I do think the next attack will be biological and probably in London.



posted on Sep, 1 2003 @ 11:42 AM
link   
Yes of course, Bin Laden is going to attack us, thats why hes spouting his plans outloud left and right all over the place.


Last year they put us on the highest terror alert on Sep 11, which was lame. They aint gonna hit on the same day. The govornment er.........I mean, damn crazy arab bastards, will hit us when were not watching. Not the anniversary, but later. or earlier. Who knows. Theres still a year until the elections, Bush and his popularity slipping. They will stage another attack (winter maybe?). But who knows.

Its strange, dont you think, Bin Laden keeps yappin full blast, like no one is after him, like he did pre 9/11. He manages somehow to keep turning in statements to Al Jazzera, and we are no closer to catching him? I mean, wouldnt the CIA be wtaching the Arab new affiliates like a hawk?

Im am beginning to wonder more and more about the rumor that Bin laden is in a CIA safe house some where, or if hes even still alive.

But the govornment will strike again. Who knows.....perhaps even the next president after Bush will be in on this profitable new market called Operation Northwoods.



posted on Sep, 1 2003 @ 01:31 PM
link   
Think about this...
What if a terrorist planted a nuke, large bomb or crashed a plane into Yellowstone park, causing a eruption. This would cause a event that we could never prepare to react from. It would be worse if it happened in the winter.
Has anyone thought of this?? Could we defend from this happening?



posted on Sep, 1 2003 @ 05:06 PM
link   
Actually, the site mentioned & linked

RE:---> hagmannpi.com/terror.htm
~~~~

was linked from Steve Quayles' dot com,
a pretty good read place....although they
both seem 'dated', proprietary & engaged
in a mutual admiration enterprise...

walk around the place, to find Emergency
Frequencies # , (radio/SW)
and lots more to read/reflect on......

stevequayle.com...

left > clik NEWS ALERT( red letters )
then> clik Global Watch
then> clik Nat'l Emerg. listening frequencies
~~~~~~

i'm sure ya'll got your connectivity/info sources for when the grid goes out- - rite?

your all keepin away from the 5 cities forming 'the crescent' ... (nyc,bos,phila,balt,dc )??

remember- '9-11' can happen on: sep 11th OR 9 november !!!
~~~~

get all your ducks in a row...


[Edited on 1-9-2003 by riffraffalunas]



posted on Sep, 1 2003 @ 05:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by LookingAround
Think about this...
What if a terrorist planted a nuke, large bomb or crashed a plane into Yellowstone park, causing a eruption.
Has anyone thought of this?? Could we defend from this happening?


Preventable, yes.

1. Put a real non-corrupt President/Commander In Chief in place and replace the incumbent administration.

2. Provide adequate (more than meagre current level) security at airports, after removing every officer and every contracted company that failed in its duties on 9/11.

3. Watch out for people carting suspicious nukes or large bombs around Yellowstone (refer 1 & 2 for security aspects).


I'm not sure that a plane crash anywhere in Yellowstone is actually going to cause much disruption to the boiling-over geothermal activity, but a nuke would be worse wouldn't it.

I say let nature take its course.

But A$$croft ought to be interested in people proposing to use nukes to blow up Yellowstone!




posted on Sep, 1 2003 @ 06:56 PM
link   
Well, Id agree solution number one would basically eliminate a need for 2 and 3. problem is....

Where the hell are we gonna find a non corrupt leader and regime?

John Kerry seems to be the biggest candidate for the Democrats. Frat boy, possible Skull and Bones?

All we ever do is elect corrupt leaders.

We simply need to stay the hell away from the big two parties, otherwise its hopeless.

Getting rid of Bush now will solve alot of problems, but can we trust the next leader to honestly work on fixing them?

Clinton did nothing to fix Bush SRs legacy.



posted on Sep, 2 2003 @ 12:43 AM
link   
I agree with Mask and Skadl - I wouldn't put it past the present administration to let something like that happen. We are just a means to their power anymore, I bet Jefferson is rolling in his grave!!! I still think the next attack is going to be a coordinated effort with little hope of stopping it. I really dont think the people that are suppose to be protecting us are. I know government employees, the higher you go the less it has to do with the actual job but rather how to play the promotion politics game. America is ripe, corrupt inept officials a military that has been nickel and dimed to death, plus stretched so thin that soon or later it will snap. All I have to say is stay alert, trust your gut feelings and pray to which ever diety will help.

[Edited on 2-9-2003 by Jimcrispi]



posted on Sep, 2 2003 @ 04:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by KrazyIvan

Originally posted by The Blade Runner
no your comment has nothing to do with it. i just think it wouldnt be advisable to be in major uk citys in the next 6 month...


a uk city? try living next to #ing UNITED STATES STATEGIC COMMAND. i know i have a bunch of russian missles pointed at me too



then maybe you cheap russkie rat, shouldn't have run away from russia "in search of a better life"

If russia is better than US (as you all say) then why they hell did you go there?

[Edited on 2-9-2003 by Freeman]







 
0
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join