It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Timcouchfanclub
Correct me if I am wrong but I remember hearing that parts Ural Mountains are the most contaminated place in the world. It used to be a nuclear waste dump or something. That could explain the radiation. As for the running out naked in the could that is puzzling. Even if there was a Mountain lion or Bear that wouldn’t make me run out naked. It would have to be something really scary. Or a pretty girl
Originally posted by Koka
This is a very interesting and spooky tale.
Can you provide some of the russian links? I have a russian friend at work who I am sure would be highly intrigued by this story.
Sounds a bit like a true life "Blair Witch".
deee Your English is quite exceptional, where did you learn?
Originally posted by nexus6
It appears from the report that at least one or two of the bodies were not naked. I would risk a wager this was simply murder or possibly even misadventure rather than ascribing anything too esoteric. If the footprints led off from the tent it's not unusual that no signs of a struggle were found in that location.
The campfire was 1.5 clicks away from the tent, far enough to lose your bearings and get lost and not be able to find your way back. Especially at night. There may well be some hi-jinks or shenanigans that went on that resulted in murderous jealousy with potentially some lethal (or at least blindness inducing) moonshine involved. I wonder if the alcohol levels in their blood was checked?
It's an eerie one though, I agree very Blair Witch it reminds me of Eilean Mor
Originally posted by nexus6
Well if the girls were virgins and alcohol tests were negative, it’s very unlikely they were sleeping all in one tent and were naked. In which case they must have been stripped after death – which once again points to a human cause. Were the women found naked? The report is not clear. I don’t think it can be said that they ‘ran away naked from the tent’ this is an assumption that makes an already unclear situation more murky. There may have been bare footprints but it’s a big jump to say they were naked.
They must have had some ‘equipment’ with them to light the campfire that the two naked men were found lying near.
The tongue of one woman was ‘missing’ was it torn out by an animal or cut out with a knife or tool? That should have been determined.
The skeptic in me also feels that perhaps ‘hypothermia’ has been used rather enthusiastically to perhaps cover up or close the book on what appears to be a brutal murder.
I found something in English, some nice pics on the first one, it sure looks godforsaken!
www.extreme.ur.ru...
english.pravda.ru...
So it seems the mountain itself has a fairly dark reputation…
Originally posted by deee
It's only around 14:00 next day after finally setting up their camp in the woods surrounding the mountain they moved out and began their ascent on the gentle mountain slope to the summit.
Originally posted by deee
Anyway, it was no big deal to spend a night on a windy slope for such experienced hikers as they all were, so they set up a tent, ate some food and then hit the sack.
Originally posted by deee
- as if they left the tent in panic with no time to go through the entrance so they cut their way through with a knife. There were no any signs of a struggle in and around the tent.
Originally posted by Freedom_for_sum
Ther's sumthin' fishy here. There seems to be some details to this story that would otherwise be impossible to determine for people/investigators who were not there during the mysterious events:
Originally posted by deee
It's only around 14:00 next day after finally setting up their camp in the woods surrounding the mountain they moved out and began their ascent on the gentle mountain slope to the summit.
How could the time of their ascent be determined, even if it's only "around 1400"?
Originally posted by deee
Anyway, it was no big deal to spend a night on a windy slope for such experienced hikers as they all were, so they set up a tent, ate some food and then hit the sack.
This sounds more like a campfire story than it does a real one. How do they know they ate some food? How do they know the food was eaten just before "hitting the sack"? Why would this fact even be mentioned when the crux of the mystery surrounds their deaths?
Originally posted by deee
- as if they left the tent in panic with no time to go through the entrance so they cut their way through with a knife. There were no any signs of a struggle in and around the tent.
The author of this mystery feigning truth is drawing conclusions without any evidence (ie: "no time to go through the entrance").
No signs of struggle inside the tent? What do the holes represent? Or does the author mean that the sleeping bags all were neatly made and clothes folded nicely in the corners?
This story rings of folklore and sounds like somthing one might tell around a campfire.
Originally posted by deee
There are nuclear facilities somewhere in this area, and most likely there are contaminated areas. I wouldn't go that far as calling the whole Ural Mountains area (which is huge) contaminated though. The area the Dyatlov's group went to was truly wild. Besides, it was 1959, just 10 years after the Russians got their first nuclear bomb made. I doubt there were any significant contamination problems back then...
However, regarding this story there are quite a few versions of what happened that involve some kind of weapon or space program Government tests. Thing is though, the area where the group was found had no any unusual radiaton levels, just some of their clothes had.