It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
SUNSPOTS: Sprawling sunspot 792 has a complicated magnetic field that harbors energy for powerful X-class solar flares. The chance of an Earth-directed explosion is increasing as the sun's rotation turns the active region more and more to face our planet. Solar activity should remain high in the days ahead.
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
Not to burst your bubble, but SpaceWeather says that EVERYTIME there is a large sunspot or sunspot grouping.
Your thread and posts have changed tone and stance repeatedly. You opened your thread with an "end of the world" tone, so I think it's fair for E_T to think that you were talking about that. Not to mention that you continually take the science and facts you present in your posts out of context or present them in a way that is to be misleading.
Whether that is intentional or not, it needs to stop. What do I suggest? Perhaps you need to take more time when posting to fully comprehend the information you present.
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
Not to burst your bubble, but SpaceWeather says that EVERYTIME there is a large sunspot or sunspot grouping.
Originally posted by Deny0rder
Damn no where in the rules of this website does it say my info has to be 100% correct 100% back up by fact or 100% grammer correct and spell checked.
Terms And Conditions Of Use
1.) You will not post any material that is knowingly false, misleading, or inaccurate.
Originally posted by Deny0rder
Please point out the knowingly misleading , knowingly false, and knowingly inaccurate info that I posted. I would like to know.
And its not just called Red Shift it is called "Doppler Shift".
if you graduated kindergarden you would know what colors to add to change it to another. And if you had some common sense you would know what colors to subtract to get another color.
Q: What causes the wind to rotate in low pressure areas?
A: High pressure areas around it.
Geostationary :
Of, relating to, or being a satellite that travels above Earth's equator from west to east at an altitude of approximately 35,900 kilometers (22,300 miles) and at a speed matching that of Earth's rotation, thus remaining stationary in relation to Earth.
You asked me for info about the upcomming sun flares and explosions...
And because we are "facing the sun more" that makes us more vualnerable to the sun flares and solar dust...
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
Byrd promptly shot down your "earthquakes caused by alignment of Sun/Earth/Moon" hypothesis. So did E_T a few posts thereafter. Zaphod58 soon after pointed out how LITTLE force the other planets planets inflict on our planet.
Later in the thread E_T also pointed out that you went back on yourself, previously saying that there is a Lunar pattern and then you changed your stance to say that there is no Lunar pattern.
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
Red Shift is the exact same thing as Doppler Shift. Both are accepted terms in astronomy to mean the same thing.
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
if you graduated kindergarden you would know what colors to add to change it to another. And if you had some common sense you would know what colors to subtract to get another color.
No need to get testy now, is there?
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
Low pressures are what cause the air to rotate around them. The stronger the low pressure, the more the rotation. The same goes for high pressures. In the N. Hemisphere lows will rotate counterclockwise, similarly highs will rotate clockwise. The high has nothing to do with causing the low to rotate.
Also, if there is a large low pressure, for example a hurricane, pretty much everything near it will be a high pressure by comparison.
Q: What causes the wind to rotate in low pressure areas?
A: High pressure areas around it.
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
Yes, way to copy straight from Geostationary - yourDictionary.com!
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
titian pointed out your exaggeration of Hurricane Isabel's windspeeds.
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
No, actually I didn't. I was asking for some credible information backing up what you said here:
And because we are "facing the sun more" that makes us more vualnerable to the sun flares and solar dust...
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
Well since you're too lazy to do it yourself, as I suggested at the end of my last post, I'll do your work for you. I may as well point out some others no one else has yet while I'm at it.
Originally posted by Earth Angel
Just noticed there is mention of planet on on the website
www.gps.caltech.edu... Save you time read this!
I no there has been alot of scare moungering about planet X, this doesn't seem so scary but i wounder if the magnetic pull from this planet getting closer to pluto neptune affect our wheather?
Originally posted by Deny0rder
OMG im starting to not like this Forum.
www.livingcosmos.com...
Read the ENTIRE part that says Solar and Lunar Triggers on Earthquakes and Volcanic Eruptions. The study is so new that there is not enough information avalible for your showing but some sites touch up on the subject.
And I NEVER EVER EVER EVER said there was a lunar "pattern" ever... and if i did please post a qoute.. PLEASE.
It is common knowledge that the Moon and the Sun and Earth align twice a month. And gravitational pulls our at its greatest at those times.. that makes the oceans tides high and can put stress on body's of land, causing earthquakes.
Actually.. Doppler Shift is the offical term made by Christian Andreas Doppler after he founded the Doppler Effect. Red shift and blue shift are names for the actions that happen when you are studying something useing the Doppler Effect.
And they DONT mean the same thing. Redshift means "moving towards the red visual light spectrum", blueshift means "moving towards the blue visual light spectrum". And Doppler Shift comes from Doppler Effect that means "A change in the observed frequency of a wave, as of sound or light, occurring when the source and observer are in motion relative to each other, with the frequency increasing when the source and observer approach each other and decreasing when they move apart. The motion of the source causes a real shift in frequency of the wave, while the motion of the observer produces only an apparent shift in frequency. Also called Doppler shift."
The point is.. what i said about Doppler shift is not KNOWINGLY FALSE. Actually it is KNOWNGLY TRUE.
You stating that it is "the same thing" is KNOWINGLY FALSE. So now you arnt following rules.
Um.. what does this have to do with being "knowingly false"?
Actually... I was correct. But I didnt explain the rotation because it was irrelivent to my point.
Actually I copyed it from Dictionary.com
dictionary.reference.com...
Once again .... what does this have to do with being "knowingly false"?
I didnt exaggerate anything.. if you would have even taken the time to read the website I posted maybe you would understand that..
Here is the site I qouted. www.handpen.com...
Scroll down to the part that says "Cosmic Dust Causes Intense Weather".
titian your source or mine must be slighty inacurate or they use different types of methods for recording the speed, or they recorded the speed at different times of Isabels life. They say 203knots(233.653 MPH) at 4500 feet useing GPS dropsondes. The site i provided says 300mph.. and other sites like this en.wikipedia.org... say only 160 mph.. so no matter what it was CATAGORY 5 .. which is unusual.
Once again.. what does this have to do with being "knowingly false"?
I thought you were talking about the sun flares, because just a few posted above this question, you stated yourself how the earths axis determines the seasons.
When i said "WE are facing the sun more" i ment that the United States or Northern Hemisphere is facing more towards the sun, because the earths axis is titled towards it. It is Summer in the United States. Now do I need to prove its summer? Or do i need to reexplain something that you were just explaining a few posts ago? Here is a PICTURE since you dont know how to read.
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
Ah yes, nothing like a random seemingly scientific website, where at the end of every section there is an advertisement to buy thier books. I'm sorry, but that website is full of crap. I especially like how it mentions all these "scientists" and "studies," yet never mentions a single name or institute! Real credible information you provided there!
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
That right there is what I believe Byrd, E_T, and myself were all referring to. Saying that just because they're (roughly) alligned twice a month we're at a higher risk for earthquakes.
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
Then what was your point?
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
Different website, same information. My point was that you didn't provide a link at the time. That's called "plagiarism."
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
Hmm... Which to chose? The scientific source or the random source with little or no credibility? That's a tough one!