It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by drakefist
It is more likely the chupa is a predator native to the gray’s planet, or a different planet they visit, if there is one. There is no easy conclusion for why they brought it here. When doing a covert operation they would need a safeguard to make sure no human stumbled onto their landed and venerable craft. Perhaps some escaped into the jungles of Puerto Rico. The only reason I submit this idea is because there has been recent photographs from Chile, and Big Bend national park in which this small green creature with large black eyes is running or standing in the background (google search big bend park in Texas chupacabra Or www.chupacabra.net to see the pics). If it was a native creature to Puerto Rico, it could not have spread across the world like that, so fast without transportation from sentient beings. Also, because it looks similar in many ways to a gray, might they relate to it more closely and choose it over some other guard/pet? This post is here to try to debunk the top belief that it is a genetically engineered pet set loose for no reason. Who agree/disagrees?
peace
Originally posted by BigWyrm
There are fish in the deep sea that make their own light, bioluminescence. Lightning bugs (fireflies) do it every night during the summer. And how do you know the chupra is an amazing jumper? How do you know anything about it. Your arguments are so full of crud it's actually pretty entertaining. Show me a video of a chupra being an "amazing jumper" and we'll see what happens, so maybe it would be convienent to just say that it has an electromagnetic field that makes it impossible to photograph/videotape while it's alive. What makes you think it can't be from earth? You don't think that there is anything on earth that can take down a 1,600# bull with no touble? 1) Human 2) Mountain lion 3) Pretty much any dog that put it's mind to it 4) Imaginary creatures that people make up to explain perfectly explainable things.
Some leaves between a couple of rocks hardly constitute "proof" of something that is 99.999999999% unproven. I like to believe some myths as much as the next guy, but I try to choose what I think is "real" with a little discretion.
Originally posted by TerraX
Maybe we need to consider the possibility that the 'chupacabra' is a mechanism of some sort, a robot if you will that collects bio-matter. One incident, involving a Puerto Rican police officer, seems to point towards something other then an animal or myth. An off duty copp on the island heard noises coming from his garage. Carying his 9mm handgun he went to investigate and found his dog fighting with a strange creature which he later said resembled a chupacabra. Without hesitation he fired at the creature from pointblank range and saw the bullet enter but not exit. Within a second the creature rolled up like a wurm and shot away at great speed.
If this report is true then there are some remarkable implications. No animal on this world could have survived or be seriously injured by large caliber bullet fired at close range. No blood was found originating from the creature. Rather then showing signs of damage in its movements the creature fled fast. On this thread it has been suggested that the creature killed a bull and seemingly people are not attacked. If this creature was an animal, could it really make a distinction between a goat and a small human - even a child? Normally predators only make the distinction in what prey they can handle and succesfully kill.
Some people of course think this is a myth, one that's part of the Latin American culture and subsequently stories evolve from scared people who make incorrect observations. That doesn't take away the fact that animal remains have been found and documented with similar wounds and probable causes of death, namely the removal of blood.
Could that be the work of humans? Some sort of secret bio-research prgram? It could be but wouldn't you think a project like that would be handled more covertly? If someone wanted to use animals for research, basicly all they had to do was hire some guys that buy animals here and there and return them to a secure location where you can do your research in all quietness and noone would ask or be the wiser. This is not the case.
The chupacabra phenomenon, what other mysterious phenomenon comes close in resemblance to this one? To me it seems like cattle mutalations in North America are rather similar although no creature has been reported yet the animals have similar injuries and causes of death with the exception that organs have been removed. Likewise the blood of the animal is removed probably through puncture wounds. Here also the animal remains are simple left to be discovered.
Again I would think regarding the cattle mutalations that there are better and more covert ways, rather then to draw attention and scare the hell out of people.
Now, who does this? Judging from their actions it seems that either they don't fully comprehend the results of their actions, or they don't care.
Making the link to ufology, UFO reports have been made in conjunction with the chupacabra and cattle mutalations. There's not a rock solid link to ETs being responsible for the listed phenomena but the possibility is there. For those that are more knowledgable regarding ET stories, what ET group would you consider mostlikely responsible given the characteristics of what we know about them and the characteristics of the animal mutalations? Which methods they used would be similar, and basicly shows their character?
This is just a theory of course and one that probably can't be proven for some time.
Originally posted by Spreadthetruth
One farmer on TV said that when he struck a chupa with his machette, it sounded as though he hit a metal bucket.
Originally posted by TerraX
Now, who does this?
Making the link to ufology, UFO reports have been made in conjunction with the chupacabra and cattle mutalations. There's not a rock solid link to ETs being responsible for the listed phenomena but the possibility is there. For those that are more knowledgable regarding ET stories, what ET group would you consider mostlikely responsible given the characteristics of what we know about them and the characteristics of the animal mutalations? Which methods they used would be similar, and basicly shows their character?
Originally posted by lost_shaman
Originally posted by TerraX
Now, who does this?
Making the link to ufology, UFO reports have been made in conjunction with the chupacabra and cattle mutalations. There's not a rock solid link to ETs being responsible for the listed phenomena but the possibility is there. For those that are more knowledgable regarding ET stories, what ET group would you consider mostlikely responsible given the characteristics of what we know about them and the characteristics of the animal mutalations? Which methods they used would be similar, and basicly shows their character?
You might be interested in the Chupas.
It should also be noted that " Chupa-chupas" or simply " Chupas" , are different things than the " Chupacabras".
Originally posted by TerraX
Originally posted by Spreadthetruth
One farmer on TV said that when he struck a chupa with his machette, it sounded as though he hit a metal bucket.
Do you recall what tv show it was on? I thought it was on a documentary of the Discovery Channel, don't recall the name though.