It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by infinite
i heard and read the press using the term "new world order" when UK/US go to war.
Originally posted by infinite
I heard about the NWO thing in 1999 and i heard that they will come in to power in the year 2000.
Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
Originally posted by infinite
I heard about the NWO thing in 1999 and i heard that they will come in to power in the year 2000.
infinite
The Bush/PNAC NWO foreshadowed by Bush Sr most assuredly came to power via election theft in 2000.
What you said was right on.
It's just that the best NWO's are invisible, and they con people into believing that everything is OK.
Most ATS members aren't even aware of it.
If you did a linear model around correlating ATS members above the awareness midpoint against their views of whether any NWO came into power in 2000, and compared that with the same correlation for members below the awareness midpoint, the differences would smack you in the face harder than I got smacked in the face with a dead trout the time I was debating political correctness with a less "aware" member 37 days ago.
Originally posted by Shining Wizard
Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
Originally posted by infinite
I heard about the NWO thing in 1999 and i heard that they will come in to power in the year 2000.
infinite
The Bush/PNAC NWO foreshadowed by Bush Sr most assuredly came to power via election theft in 2000.
What you said was right on.
It's just that the best NWO's are invisible, and they con people into believing that everything is OK.
Most ATS members aren't even aware of it.
If you did a linear model around correlating ATS members above the awareness midpoint against their views of whether any NWO came into power in 2000, and compared that with the same correlation for members below the awareness midpoint, the differences would smack you in the face harder than I got smacked in the face with a dead trout the time I was debating political correctness with a less "aware" member 37 days ago.
Bush (s) are not capable of being involved in the NWO (if there is such a thing) think about it..........They certainly don't have the money to be that influential in these matters.
They made have been put there by various groups who like to have, how do I say this PC, less able politicans in office so that they may do there thing. The Iraq/Korea/Al-quieda episodes tell me that while we are all focusing on these terrorist groups, nobody is focusing on who is making $$$$ of this effort, the Central Europeans and Asia, they are breaking the bank as we speak.
Do I belive there are unseen people whom rule the world, of course, it's human nature (the strong rule the weak but the wise rule the strong)
Do they want us all to be puppets? No way, why?, why would they want that? Want they want is the power to make their lives and the lives of their families better for the rest of known time, that's all, what really matters to a human behind that? power? they don't need it? Publicity? They don't want it,
I think we need to follow the money, then we can put this whole terrorism war where it needs to be, Europe and Asia.
Just my take
Originally posted by William
The first recorded use of "New World Order" was uttered by then president William McKinley on 1898 when addressing congress about the troubles that would eventually become the Spanish American War.
(I did this research about 12 years ago)
Originally posted by Shining Wizard
Bush is no more an NWO member than I am, he may thinks he's in the know so to speak, but really, he is just too loose lipped and head strong to be a viable member of the group (or he is the BEST actor in the world). In the whole scheme of things the Bush's are Poor compared to the wealthy families in Europe, Joe Kennedy was American's most pro 1 world order politician and that was over 70 years ago (when he lived in England) but since then, besides Clinton, we have been a thorn in the backs of the "old money network"
Now are Americans involved in the money scheme? Of course, lot's of them, but trust me Europe is the danger Zone followed by Red China, watch out CA, just mark my words, it won't be you that's affected, not enough time, but worry about your children if the US falls, there will be nobody left to show the world freedom for what it really is, like it or not.
We are the last bastion of hope, the light in the tunnel and yet we continue to stick or nose into things that waste our time, like Iraq and Korea, they can't hurt us, hell the who world together would lose A LOT of people before they stepped foot on American soil, we need to go Isolationist except for trading and let the rest of the world sort out there problems, that's the only solution.
Originally posted by William
The first recorded use of "New World Order" was uttered by then president William McKinley on 1898 when addressing congress about the troubles that would eventually become the Spanish American War.
(I did this research about 12 years ago)
Originally posted by Shining Wizard
We all must get along a battle the corruption that is our political systems, how do we do it? what is your idea?