It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NinjaCodeMonkey
Japan had been wanting to surrender for some time with only one request, that they be allowed to keep their emperor. The US pretended that no talks were going on and in the end they let them keep their emperor so the nukes were just a disgusting act of cruelty.
Originally posted by DCFusion
Originally posted by NinjaCodeMonkey
Japan had been wanting to surrender for some time with only one request, that they be allowed to keep their emperor. The US pretended that no talks were going on and in the end they let them keep their emperor so the nukes were just a disgusting act of cruelty.
I did not know this. I thought that it was really just Emporer Hirohito who wanted to surrender, but the war council did not.
Originally posted by NinjaCodeMonkey
Japan had been wanting to surrender for some time with only one request, that they be allowed to keep their emperor. The US pretended that no talks were going on and in the end they let them keep their emperor so the nukes were just a disgusting act of cruelty.
According to an account by Walter Brown, assistant to then-US secretary of state James Byrnes, Truman agreed at a meeting three days before the bomb was dropped on Hiroshima that Japan was "looking for peace". Truman was told by his army generals, Douglas Macarthur and Dwight Eisenhower, and his naval chief of staff, William Leahy, that there was no military need to use the bomb.
Wikipedia
During the conference, Truman mentioned to Stalin about an unspecified "powerful new weapon"; Stalin, who ironically knew of its existence long before Truman ever knew, encouraged the usage of any weapon that would hasten the end of the war. Towards the end of the conference, Japan was given an ultimatum (threatening "prompt and utter destruction", without mentioning the new bomb), and after Japan had rejected it, atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and August 9, respectively. Truman made the decision to use atomic weapons to end the war while at the conference.
Originally posted by NinjaCodeMonkey
Well they definitely wanted to show Russia that they had the weapons but most of all they wanted to test them out in real life. Japan had been wanting to surrender for some time with only one request, that they be allowed to keep their emperor. The US pretended that no talks were going on and in the end they let them keep their emperor so the nukes were just a disgusting act of cruelty. Russia was planning on attacking Japan a few days after the nukes would be dropped and helping the US. They did not want Russia to have any say in the aftermath in Japan so that is another reason why they dropped the bombs.
Originally posted by Davood
If this is provable, and it is true... Then the USA owes severe reparations to the Japanese.
Originally posted by Corinthas
"The US decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 was meant to kick-start the Cold War rather than end the Second World War,
NinjaCodeMonkey
Japan had been wanting to surrender for some time with only one request, that they be allowed to keep their emperor.
Then the USA owes severe reparations to the Japanese
Originally posted by GlobalDisorder
If the nukes were intending to end the war, why not just drop one on tokyo?
that woulda ended the war ' if it was still majorly hot ' pretty damn quick.
I mean the allies destroyed berlin and dresden....
The reason it screams out at me as being a experiment.. is they used 2 bombs, at 2 different times of day, on 2 different geological sites...
We new they worked on desert..... we needed to know the destruction they were capable of.
Originally posted by 2Super7E123
...mainly to keep Russian out...
...countries like Russian, China, and Korea...
...mainly the Military bases the U.S. runned...
Originally posted by 2Super7E123
P.S. Also if some of you haven't put two and two together, based on the new threats these supposed World Wide terrorists have made, I believe there are strong indications that they have nuclear arms and will use these bombs tomorrow. The main significance is the fact that tomorrow is the U.S. Bombing Japan 60 year anniversy. Hence: August '6' | '6'0 years | '6' th day of the week = 666. But then again I could be wrong. It was just a hunch based on some military intelligence I have.
Originally posted by 2Super7E123
AS we all know the anniversy of these bombings are tomorrow. ...And yes the U.S. had a political agenda to bombing Japan. Mainly to keep Russian out and have Japan for themselves. The biggest reason why we still have U.S. Soldiers in Japan today is to prevent any potential war from the U.S. West coast with countries like Russian, China, and Korea. Another reason why the U.S. is here is to rebuild the Japanese infrastructure. In a few years majority of the U.S. Forces will be out of Japan and we will give Japan most of the land back, mainly the Military bases the U.S. runned. Trust me, I should know, I in the Air Force and stationed in Japan.
P.S. Also if some of you haven't put two and two together, based on the new threats these supposed World Wide terrorists have made, I believe there are strong indications that they have nuclear arms and will use these bombs tomorrow. The main significance is the fact that tomorrow is the U.S. Bombing Japan 60 year anniversy. Hence: August '6' | '6'0 years | '6' th day of the week = 666. But then again I could be wrong. It was just a hunch based on some military intelligence I have.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by DCFusion
Originally posted by NinjaCodeMonkey
Japan had been wanting to surrender for some time with only one request, that they be allowed to keep their emperor. The US pretended that no talks were going on and in the end they let them keep their emperor so the nukes were just a disgusting act of cruelty.
I did not know this. I thought that it was really just Emporer Hirohito who wanted to surrender, but the war council did not.
thats what i thought too lol
its in our history books that way
but u never know , it could be a lie ....
Originally posted by FredT
As stated above Tokyo was not selected because the city was already burned out.