It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
Here's the logic in the above post:
1. There is no proof.
2. Well, there is proof, but I don't like it because it disagrees with me. My opinions are more important than the proof.
3. I can add some contrived facts to my opinions too, and not many of you will notice.[edit on 27-7-2005 by MaskedAvatar]
Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
That a number of suspected "hijackers" on 9/11 were misidentified or victims of identity theft is proven beyond doubt.
Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
I have linked to a number of authoritative statements on the identity theft several times since April 2003, and frankly I've become disinclined to do things over and over again.
Originally posted by edsinger
Passenger lists, hmmm
Well then we should at least know the ASSUMED names of the attackers right?
Oh wait, I forgot, it was an inside job wasn't? All the passengers were given new Identities, lots of cash, and 70 virgins on top of that.
Or were they just killed and dumped in the ocean with concrete shoes?
Originally posted by bsbray11
the planes did have much lower occupancies than was usual on 9/11.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Considering how many people died at the WTC, and how obvious it must have been that a lot of people were going to die, I don't see why the people behind it would refrain from killing the passengers on those planes. They could have gone about it in many different ways, too, no doubt.
Originally posted by edsinger
Originally posted by bsbray11
Considering how many people died at the WTC, and how obvious it must have been that a lot of people were going to die, I don't see why the people behind it would refrain from killing the passengers on those planes. They could have gone about it in many different ways, too, no doubt.
Yeah and the way they faked the cell phone calls from the plane to their families was a pretty slick trick ol Bush did to wasnt it?
In one of two calls Ted Olsen said he received from his wife, Barbara, she asked "What should I tell the pilot?," referring to Chic Burlingame, the captain, who was then supposedly seated in the rear with Barbara. Chic was a graduate of Naval Academy and flew F-4s in Vietnam. It seems highly doubtful that he could have been persuaded to hand over the stick without a fight, and agree to sit in the back of the plane, especially when controllers had been broadcasting to pilots that Flight 11 had been hijacked.
Madeline Sweeney, who was the "anchor" for Flight 11, says: "I see, buildings, water, ... Oh my God!", immediately before the crash, as though she, a Massachusetts-based flight attendant of 12 years, had never seen the Manhattan skyline before. Supposedly she was continuously monitoring the view out a window.
There is no public evidence of recordings of any of the conversations, despite the extended length of some of them, except for the alleged calls from Flight 11 attendants Madeline Sweeney and Betty Ong.
John Ogonowski was captain of American Airlines flight 11. Ogonowski was an Air Force fighter pilot in Vietnam and joined American Airlines in 1979. He was big, burly and physically strong. His co-pilot, Tom McGuinness, was also in excellent physical condition.
Victor Saracini was captain of United Airlines Flight 175. Saracini was a former fighter pilot of the Vietnam era. He was in superb physical shape, with a quick and alert mind.
...
LeRoy Homer was the first officer of United Airlines Flight 93. It crashed in Somerset County, PA, at 10:10 a.m. Homer, muscular and agile, was a former Air Force pilot.
Given the experience of these pilots, it is very difficult to imagine a forced takeover of any of their cockpits.