London Bombing: How the Story Keeps Chaninging

It's fascinating how this story continues to mutate...

It is amazing how quickly details about the suspects (patsies) have emerged and how quickly the police have stacked up “evidence” against the conveniently dead and blasted to smithereens suspects, leading us to the conclusion al-Qaeda consists or rank amateurs. Magdy el-Nashar was on a security watch and yet “he was not put under surveillance, as he was not regarded as being of sufficiently high risk,” according to the Times Online. Meanwhile, in the United States, members of the innocuous Green Party are put on security risk lists at airports. Most of the London bombing cover story is riddled with holes you could drive a Mack truck through and yet our acquiescent corporate media never bothers to mention these problems or the highly suspicious tweaking of the story.

But never mind. Booga-booga. Rest assured the governments of Britian and the United States are dogged in their attempts to protect us from al-Qaeda terr’ists, never mind those terrorists were assembled, trained, and funded by the CIA, MI5 and MI6, and Pakistan’s ISI.
kurtnimmo.com...

Shouldn't really suprise anyone. I however do need to do more research on all this

Originally posted by Seoul On Ice
Shouldn't really suprise anyone. I however do need to do more research on all this

So what are you saying? Inside job?

for the chances of coincidence, see the astronomical figure in my nice new signature.