It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But last, and most definitely not least, when Blair stood in front of the other G8 members and made his speech, Bush stood behind him to his right in a position that sent chills up my spine. The man stood with legs apart, hands in a semi-fist position, head back, face clenched, face stern, his eyes darting left and right as if he were pondering of the audience: what do they know?
I would prefer him to presume of one respect; support; understanding, not one that reminds me of the SS, which is obviously for you the fetal position.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpottWhat position would you prefer the leader of the free world to assume? The fetal position?
Silly boy! how is it possible for me to put a thought into the mind of a man who has not the ability to absorb a thought? And frankly do I care about your president of your united states? The answer is emphatically; No!
You really shouldn't put thoughts into the mind of the President of the United States. If the world now know anything, it is that GW Bush is not to be trifled with. I like that.
One other thing...Did the free world vote on a leader at some point, and I missed same?
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
What position would you prefer the leader of the free world to assume? The fetal position?
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween
Silly boy!
Good Lord! muster up something more than a sophomoric response.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween
Silly boy!
You may refer to your drag queen friends as "silly boy," but in this context you are way off base.
First things first. I care not one wit what offends the moderators, so as far as I am concerned, feel free to speak your mind and call me whatever insipid and off-colour name comes to your mind, I get a kick out of how easy it is set my opponent off balance.
To avoid the wrath of the moderators, I will refrain from calling you what you are here on the board. Let us just say, SomewhereinBetween, that if you were to get to within arms length of me, you'd be somewhere in the middle of next week.
A threat? you will do what exactly, punch my fonts out as you hide behind a monitor? This is manly no? Just state what it is you would like to do in order to feel as though you can exact revenge for your inability to respond to my initial post with any semblance of credulity, philpott.
It's easy to be "cute" on a bulletin board. Perhaps you should learn to assume a position of respect before you go spouting off about the President or other board members.
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween
Just state what it is you would like to do in order to feel as though you can exact revenge for your inability to respond to my initial post with any semblance of credulity, philpott.
Originally posted by baaronhaile
ps. bush has no spine.
Source 1
There are no documented accounts of these events ever happening in the Philippines or anywhere else in 1911 or at any other time. Even experts who have studied "Black Jack" have no record of it. Pershing biographer, Dr. Frank E. Vandiver, told Urban Legends expert, David Emery, that he has found no historical account of such a strategy and feels that such actions would run counter to what is know of Pershing's character.
Typical testosterone induced response; incite puglisim first, then on second response consider the possibility that machismo was overdoing it a bit. If I were me? Another threat? What exactly do you think you can do to silence me? I have untold number of platforms within which to make my statements. Well I am me philpott, and I have made a statement to which I see nothing but boyish bravado and hollow threats in response, so I await a somewhat plausible intelligent rebuttal from you. How much time do you need to formulate one, a month, year, never?
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
SomewhereinBetween
Right now, the hearts of the American people are one with Britain in their tragedy. If I were you, I wouldn't try to undertake a one-man (if that's the right word) campaign to end that.
Help us from whom GW?
GW and America had nothing to do with today's bombing and we'll be there to help out your nation just as we did throughout the 20th century.
Now that is an oxymoron if I ever read one. I leave it up to you to figure out what I mean.
Here's a man with the right idea.
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween
Well I am me philpott, and I have made a statement to which I see nothing but boyish bravado and hollow threats in response, so I await a somewhat plausible intelligent rebuttal from you. How much time do you need to formulate one, a month, year, never?