posted on Jun, 13 2005 @ 03:21 PM
Geez, no bias or hatred in this nice "op ed" article..FTA:
"a second-term imperial presidency"
"attack"
"intimidate and snuff out"
Emotionally loaded words showing the author's hatred and desire to load "feelings" rather than any sort of fact finding. I'd have to put this in
the same load as a lot of the anti-Clinton stuff and most left or right wing ranting.
Hell, sounds a lot like the Bob Lazar folks whenever their UFO theories are shot down.
This sort of thing does a great disservice to the truth. There are articles and history showing terrible things done (and for campaign reasons of all
things) but fluffy, hate filled psycholinguistics is a waste of time for readers. And it adds BS partisan politics-instead of looking for truth. We
would be better served to wonder how many other politicians Republican and Democrat, have done this and worse, and not gotten caught. We should be
vigilant when *any* individual is making a political statement or career- President or Senator, appointed official or elected, self-aggrandized or
media- manufactured. Not just our opponents, named by our parties.
The real lesson to be learned from the Watergate scandal: There *are* conspiracies, coverups, and shadowy people trying to hide truths.