It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jehosephat
I really wish people stopped using "Lucifer" (The morning star, light bearer, Venus) when referring to Satan (Adversary; accuser).
Originally posted by smadewell
Originally posted by Jehosephat
I really wish people stopped using "Lucifer" (The morning star, light bearer, Venus) when referring to Satan (Adversary; accuser).
Ditto that! Totally agree with what you said in your post. As to the thread's question? Is there a Luciferian conspiracy? Yes, but only on alternating Tuesdays.
Originally posted by jake1997
Yes, Lucifer was the highest of angels. The bible calls him the cherub that covers. Until he rebelled.
Originally posted by jake1997
Originally posted by Jehosephat I really wish people stopped using "Lucifer" (The morning star, light bearer, Venus) when referring to Satan (Adversary; accuser). Most of what you are describing is what is known as "Christian Mythology" and was covered at length in John Miltons epic poem "Paradise Lost" most people get thier information about interactions between heaven and hell, angels and thier fall, from that poem.
John Milton (1608-1674) KJV bible 1611. Unless Milton did all of this by the age of 3, I doubt it comes from him.
Originally posted by Jehosephat
That is very nice Jake, but i fail to see how a prophacy against the Kingdom of Tyre, which at the time is a prosperous trading kingdom on the sea, which would be destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon. If anything the King of Trye is nothing more then a figurative Satan. Which does nothing to prove your point that "lucifer" was the highest of angels except in allegory and figurative reasoning
Isa 14:13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:
Isa 14:14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.
Isa 14:15 Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.
Eze 28:12 Son of man, take up a lamentation upon the king of Tyrus, and say unto him, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty.
Eze 28:13 Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created.
Eze 28:14 Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire.
Eze 28:15 Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee.
Eze 28:16 By the multitude of thy merchandise they have filled the midst of thee with violence, and thou hast sinned: therefore I will cast thee as profane out of the mountain of God: and I will destroy thee, O covering cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire.
Originally posted by jake1997You have to ignore quite a bit to make that only the king of Tyre. Perfect. Walked in Eden, etc....
Originally posted by Jehosephat
That takes pure conjecture to claim that the passages talk about "lucifer" when It could easily be talking abouit Adam, or more specifically Mankind.
In fact, they could be talking about MANY things and it is only thru conjecture we can assume it is something we have no proof really is.
You need to build a straonger case then just quoting a specific bible passage over and over to make your point