It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by chinawhite
With all these Sanctions their just pushing china away to europe and russian tech. the US is losing a lucrative chinese market with all this irresponsible sanctions.
Originally posted by longbow
Originally posted by chinawhite
With all these Sanctions their just pushing china away to europe and russian tech. the US is losing a lucrative chinese market with all this irresponsible sanctions.
There is no such thing as "lucrative chinese market". Look at the trade deficit USA VS China. In fact the best solution for US (and also other) economy would be to immediately put an absolute embargo on the whole US-China trade. The sooner the better.
"The Chinese government pattern of promises made and promises broken on trade issues, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction technology and on human rights and basic freedoms continues"
"Despite claims that China is helping to halt the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related technology, numerous examples of such proliferation from China continue"
Miss Bartholomew also said there are reports that North Korea has used Chinese facilities for transshipping weapons exports to third countries.
The U.S. report includes a chart showing Chinese companies have sold CSS-8 and DF-15 ballistic missiles to Iran, along with cruise missiles identified as HY-1, HY-2 Silkworm, C-201, C-601, C-801 and C-802.
The report says China also is suspected of assisting Iran with the medium-range Shahab-3 missile, which was recently tested by the Iranians.
Other Chinese assistance to the Iranian missile programs has included support for indigenous Iranian missiles, propellant and chemicals used in making missile fuel, missile-guidance kits, gyroscopes, accelerometers and test equipment.
Many of the companies involved in the missile-related sales are state-owned enterprises or formerly state-owned companies connected to the Chinese military.
Originally posted by chinawhite
Originally posted by longbow
Originally posted by chinawhite
With all these Sanctions their just pushing china away to europe and russian tech. the US is losing a lucrative chinese market with all this irresponsible sanctions.
There is no such thing as "lucrative chinese market". Look at the trade deficit USA VS China. In fact the best solution for US (and also other) economy would be to immediately put an absolute embargo on the whole US-China trade. The sooner the better.
i mean the booming chinese domestic aircraft market. Now all the orders are going to Airbus.
If china and US stop trade then whats going to happen???
US companys reinvest in US again..WRONG
the gap is going to be filled by other countries like mexico and third world countries. The USA is going to paid for inferior quailty produts and still have a very large trade defict
Originally posted by Daedalus3
Originally posted by chinawhite
Originally posted by longbow
Originally posted by chinawhite
With all these Sanctions their just pushing china away to europe and russian tech. the US is losing a lucrative chinese market with all this irresponsible sanctions.
There is no such thing as "lucrative chinese market". Look at the trade deficit USA VS China. In fact the best solution for US (and also other) economy would be to immediately put an absolute embargo on the whole US-China trade. The sooner the better.
i mean the booming chinese domestic aircraft market. Now all the orders are going to Airbus.
If china and US stop trade then whats going to happen???
US companys reinvest in US again..WRONG
the gap is going to be filled by other countries like mexico and third world countries. The USA is going to paid for inferior quailty produts and still have a very large trade defict
US companies invest in the middle-east, In india, In east european nations, phillipines,Taiwan, South america.. China's is not an "only solution"
Originally posted by BillHicksRules
China,
What is also important is how much China has invested in America.
In this case I have to say that the Chinese exporting of missile tech is a bad move.
I have no issue with a country developing its own. Development tends to lead to a more responsible attitude to use.
Being given in without having to work at it tends to mean a lack of respect for the technology.
The best example of this is Saddam's use of chemical weapons.
Cheers
BHR
Originally posted by chinawhite
Originally posted by BillHicksRules
China,
What is also important is how much China has invested in America.
In this case I have to say that the Chinese exporting of missile tech is a bad move.
I have no issue with a country developing its own. Development tends to lead to a more responsible attitude to use.
Being given in without having to work at it tends to mean a lack of respect for the technology.
The best example of this is Saddam's use of chemical weapons.
Cheers
BHR
China does invest in america but not as much so as american companies invest in china.
the western powers gave Saddam chemical weapons.
Originally posted by Char2c35t
Originally posted by chinawhite
Originally posted by BillHicksRules
China,
What is also important is how much China has invested in America.
In this case I have to say that the Chinese exporting of missile tech is a bad move.
I have no issue with a country developing its own. Development tends to lead to a more responsible attitude to use.
Being given in without having to work at it tends to mean a lack of respect for the technology.
The best example of this is Saddam's use of chemical weapons.
Cheers
BHR
China does invest in america but not as much so as american companies invest in china.
the western powers gave Saddam chemical weapons.
yup thats why i said that china better be careful or it will end up like russia or iraq but chinawhite if you think its just american companies then you are wrong its the EU too. But, it looks like china is playing the game lets just hope they know the rules.
Originally posted by W4rl0rD
Why does it happen that when China trades weapons to other countries, everybody rattles on and on while when the US trades weapons to Taiwan, Japan and SK, everyone keeps quiet? It just doesn't make sense why one country can't export arms while another country can export as much arms as they want.