It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Ok, this thread has mentally scarred me as I've thought about it all day long.
Remember the two clocks, set at the same, precise time, they placed one on the space shuttle and left one on the ground. When the shuttle returned, the one that was in the shuttle was a bit slower than the one that remained on earth. Consequently, it was pointed out in the article that if one twin went up and one remained on earth, the one that went up would be younger upon return as time slowed down for him.
Argh! Where's the aspirin?
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Remember the two clocks, set at the same, precise time, they placed one on the space shuttle and left one on the ground. When the shuttle returned, the one that was in the shuttle was a bit slower than the one that remained on earth. Consequently, it was pointed out in the article that if one twin went up and one remained on earth, the one that went up would be younger upon return as time slowed down for him.
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
What were the words used to describe "clockwise" and "counterclockwise" motions in English -- before there were clocks?
Originally posted by IndigenousDave
It could go on indefinetly, so that I would never be able to cut my 2X4 EXACTLY 3ft 4 and 7/8 inches. I would never be able to reach my absolute zero.
Originally posted by Bhadhidar
Perhaps the true question should be : Can we measure Time?
If by measure we mean the establishment of universally constant, discrete, divisions, then the article referenced here:
www.spacedaily.com...
would seem to argue that the answer should be, No.
And the implications are therefore truelly boggling. Lynds argues that it is not possible to actually divide Time into descrete pieces since it s is not possible to isolate a single "instant of Time".