It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mrsdudara
For instance, my understanding is that NK and Iran have or are developing nukes for protection. All and all they just want to be left alone.
Originally posted by chebob
What worries me is that some people seem to believe that a UK/US coallition could pop into Iran / N.K , dispose of their facilitys, then say "Toodle Doo, see you next time you do something naughty" without retribution. I find that highly dubious.
What worries me is that some people seem to believe that a UK/US coallition could pop into Iran / N.K , dispose of their facilitys, then say "Toodle Doo, see you next time you do something naughty" without retribution.
Originally posted by xmotex
Fantasies of omnipotence are pretty common among the hyper nationalist crowd.
It's not just in the US though, you can see it in the hyper nationalists from other countries too (no I won't name any names.)
It's like extreme sports fandom.
People identify to strongly with their "team", their "team" can never lose without some nefarious interference, their "team" can do no wrong, their "team" is the best team in the world, etc. etc...
It's like an external supplement for self-esteem or something.
Originally posted by MickeyDee
The US/UK could send special forces in to destroy all there facilities with minimal retributions.....
Alternativley we could wind up Israel to the point that they will do it for us!
Remember, Israel REALLY REALLY dont want Iran to become a nuclear power!
Mic
Originally posted by MickeyDee
The US/UK could send special forces in to destroy all there facilities with minimal retributions.....
Originally posted by devilwasp
Or we could just develop a weapon to destroy those weapons from a stealth bomber....
Originally posted by chebob
Originally posted by MickeyDee
The US/UK could send special forces in to destroy all there facilities with minimal retributions.....
Point proven. This is bull#. Iran and N.K will NOT say "Oh, they came in and wiped out our weapons without us noticing. I guess we'd better not do anything back, they are too powerful". Thats pure fantasy
Originally posted by MickeyDee
Originally posted by chebob
Originally posted by MickeyDee
The US/UK could send special forces in to destroy all there facilities with minimal retributions.....
Point proven. This is bull#. Iran and N.K will NOT say "Oh, they came in and wiped out our weapons without us noticing. I guess we'd better not do anything back, they are too powerful". Thats pure fantasy
If the West destroyed Iran and NK's nuclear facilities what exactly are they going to do about it?
They cant nuke us, and as long as we are catious as to who we let in the country we should be relativley safe!
Mic
We've already established that an actual attack on US soil by Kim is highly unlikely
Mic
Originally posted by mrsdudara
I do not think it is all that unlikely. All he has to do is load it up on one of those missles that detonate in the air (like Iran has). Then put it on a boat, sail it close to our country and kaboom.
Originally posted by Nordix
Americans, please, be wise and don’t you ever stuck your noses to any countries. They can solve their problems without you.
Nuclear bombing will result in war against USA, the world nations will understand the true danger.
Originally posted by deltaboy
we try dat already, we try to stay away from peoples affairs but they be beggin for it, not to mention criticizing us for not intervening as Clinton had to apoligize for the Rwanda massacre in 94 or maybe being late to save many lives in Bosnia or Kosovo and not doin anithing. tsk tsk. double standards. criticize for intervening and then criticizing for not intervening.
Originally posted by Simon666
Well, in Rwanda there was a genocide going on, in Iraq not. In Rwanda there was no oil, in Iraq there was. So it's not like the situations nor motives were similar, so your argument that intervention should either be criticized in both cases or not criticized in both cases is invalid. Considering Kosovo: NATO killed more Serb civilians than the Serbs killed innocent Kosovars. I think criticism is justified when the killings by NATO are greater than the proclaimed "genocide" by the Serbs.
[edit on 21-7-2005 by Simon666]