It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Plumbo
Well I differ. It's got a center.
Originally posted by Amorymeltzer
Where? From every vantage point in the universe, the rest of the universe is moving away from it.
With the balloon, this correlates to being blown up. At t=0, it's nothing. That's the center. But when it gets blown up, it grows out. The surface of the balloon is space. The "center" is in the middle of the balloon, NOT on the surface - it doesn't exist.
WHAT are you talking about? You've got a geocentric model here, totally unexplained (wonder why?) as well as a nonsensical post. Please either clearly state what you're trying to say, or find another way to say it.
Originally posted by jake1997
I have to state for the record right now, for all of you who are not religious in nature,
This crazy cartoon you are witnessing is in no way supported by the christian bible , nor even is it heard of in christian theory.
It is so far outside the bible that it may as well be evolution
This crazy cartoon you are witnessing is in no way supported by the christian bible
Originally posted by jake1997
Does the Universe have an edge or end? This assumes FTL travel that would let us go where we wanted as fast as we wanted
All matter was in the dot before the Big Bang . It exploded...and everything spread out.
Two logical conclusions seem to come out of this...
1.) Space...the universe..has an end or edge where stuff is still spreading
2.) Beyond that edge...things that thrive inside the universe...cannot go. Its like a fish leaving water. We cant go. So 'space' is actually 'something substantial'.
Am I making sense with this?
Does the universe have an edge or end beyond which we couldnt go if we had the means to travel there, using the Big Bang as the beginning?
Maybe your answers will better define the question
posted by leftBehind
However it could be a cycle and if the Universe ever starts to collapse, we would find the edge of the universe closer by, to our dismay.
Originally posted by jake1997
For lack of knowledge, I was starting with several assumptions...
One of the assumptions was that space/time were part of the Big Bang and subject to the same forces as matter. Call it Dark Matter or whatever.
I picture space/time like 'water' and matter as 'stuff' in the water.
Eventually the expansion ceases, and reverses, and everything goes back to the dot.... etc
Is space/time tangible?
Air' use to be thought of as nothing'. Just like space/time today.
What say you?
Originally posted by I See You
I don't believe the universe can have an edge or end. If it has an edge or ending, what is on the other side of that edge? It must be infinite in every direction where it never ends. Fathom that.
Originally posted by Amorymeltzer
The answer is still No.
You don't need a source for the universe to keep expanding. It's like if you throw a ball in space. Once you throw it, there is no longer a "source" pushing it but it keeps going. Until something stops it anyway. So what happens if there's nothing to "stop" the universe?
Originally posted by Stuey1221
If theres nothing to stop the universe... then whys it growing, if you catch my drift?
Originally posted by shaunybaby
would there be a point if you kept going where space would just be black, where space has yet to expand to etc.
but if you kept going surely it cant go on forever
Originally posted by Nventual
I suppose growing up 'knowing' that everything has an end to it, and not being taught about the end of the Universe or anything, you'd just assume that everything has to have an end and that's the way the world works.