posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 04:07 AM
originally posted by: ALiCCE
a reply to: stratsys-sws
Indeed. Holographic drives may be slower, but they can contain much more data for their size. Also, DNA storage is interesting...
Hypothetically speaking perhaps that was an advantage ten years ago, but now we're looking at 18TB in a 2.5 inch Solid state chip! By the time you add
a read/write device to an optical drive size is not an issue. No company is yet to succeed in the production and sales of a Holographic Hard Drive,
for many reasons.
The energy consumption would also be much much higher, therefore heat production would be too. In a datacentre those are your considerations, far more
important than space.
Even when breakthroughs like
this occur, two years later we're still not seeing Holodrives being
marketed.
Shame though, a 'graphene nanotube holographic drive' sounds so much cooler than SSD!
Blackfinger, again absolutely no reflection on you and no offence intended but that long extract by blindbybelief is a load of tripe!
Cheers
Robbie