It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by truthseeka
I haven't done one yet, I have better things to do right now, but trust me, I will. Then you'll have a somewhat more valid reason to cry "it's the JOOOS, it's the JOOOOOS!"
Originally posted by Obfuscate
Shutup Israeli sympathizer. Go rape a child and have to pickup trash on the side of the road. Maybe you will get a medal of honor from the IDF.
You have already exhibited you do not have any acceptable morals. Cease from posting int his thread.
(I am exercising my promise that I will slander Israel every chance I get now).
[edit on 11-5-2005 by Obfuscate]
Originally posted by Xenersys
Originally posted by Obfuscate
Shutup Israeli sympathizer. Go rape a child and have to pickup trash on the side of the road. Maybe you will get a medal of honor from the IDF.
You have already exhibited you do not have any acceptable morals. Cease from posting int his thread.
(I am exercising my promise that I will slander Israel every chance I get now).
[edit on 11-5-2005 by Obfuscate]
"Sympathizer"? I think this has more to do with radical court systems than Jews or anything else religious. Herbrew law is very specific about such things.
Originally posted by Obfuscate
Shutup Israeli sympathizer. Go rape a child and have to pickup trash on the side of the road. Maybe you will get a medal of honor from the IDF.
Originally posted by Souljah
So, whats the Deal here? UN Troop molest and rape young African Girls, American Mercenaries perform Sex Trafficking in Bosnia, Catholic Priests rape young Ministrant Boys, Islamic Court orders a Woman Raped and Isreali soldier gets Community Service for Raping his own Cousin?
Whats Wrong with this Picture?
Everything!
Originally posted by accidental tourist
I have to ask what is being questioned here?
A lenient sentence for rape .. ie injustice?
Or a lenient sentence for an Israeli soldier?
Because if one was searching for out of touch sentences, overly lenient or inhumanely harsh .. your search would be close to infinite.
Name your subject and grievance honestly...
Zionism, Those Israelies, Those Jews eg..
Perhaps would be closer to the bull's eye?
Any thoughts?
Originally posted by Obfuscate
. But I proved him wrong and the absolute minimum is 3 years in prison.
Originally posted by Amuk
[this was from RI but the same aplies to any state
www.brown.edu...
An electronic analysis by Cheit of the outcomes for those charged with child molestation from 1985-1993 revealed that 70 percent of those found guilty did not serve jail time. "Most people think that if found guilty of a felony sex offense against a child you'll serve serious time, but that is rarely the case," said Cheit.
Did you read that? 70% recive NO JAIL TIME hardly the 10 years to life some would have you believe.
So no, here in the States at least the sentence would be normal
[edit on 11-5-2005 by Amuk]
Originally posted by truthseeka
Child molestation and rape are two different things. Child molestation can include rape, but then it's called sexual assault on a minor or something.
Registered: 12-5-2002
Location: New York City
Originally posted by Amuk
Maybe I have a simplistic view of the world but I think shooting the rapists no matter who they are would be a good start
Originally posted by drogo
i agree community service is sending a message?? ya a message that it is all right.
one part i DO like however and that is the finantual penalty. i realy don't think it is enough but it IS a step in the right direction. the comunity servce however is bunk. what kind of a deturant is that? ohhhh don't rape or you will have to clean up a park.
you know please don't flame me for this but.....i have begun to wonder about the old testimont handleing of rape (under adultery, note i am not saying that we should be following it, only that there are some possible advantages to it) and that is the killing of both involved. at first glance in the case of rape it does seem rather extreem for the unwilling victome. but when you considder the damage that is done to the victome, given all the phychiatric help and drugs that are used today, ect. was this actualy less cruel then letting them survive? also add in that victomes of rape especialy male victomes have a great chance of committing the same type of crime later. is this in fact the best solution? especialy given the time period invoved, is this the reason for it? just thinking about what is done today to help such a victome and the fact that that was not available at the time, and that even with all we do it is not even enough. i also remember some stipulation about an un-married women marrying the rapest but can't find it atm, but could that not be much better? i am talking about all the problems that arise from it happening. rape has to be one of the most destructive crime arround. i am NOT trying to say that we should currantly do this, but exploreing the possible reasoning behind it. it has always bothered me, but was there good reason for it? was it actualy the best thing at the time that COULD be done for the victome?
BTW Israel is litterally above the law. It's financed by the USA, and to a lesser extent Britian, and Europe.
Originally posted by cafeman
I wonder what would have been the sentence if he had been Palestinian?