It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
they'll be able to reallocate funds into safer U.S. bond funds to insulate
themselves from any stock volatility right before retirement.
Originally posted by TxSecret
....... WE ALREADY have private investment options.. Why privatize social security? ......
This link pretty much sums it all up:
www.new-enlightenment.com...
[edit on 30-4-2005 by TxSecret]
Originally posted by Kidfinger
Bush is using logical falicies to promote a plan that does nothing more than make his 'investors' rich. Besides, Bush couldnt fix a broken model even if it was a snap together model. Why in the hell does anyone actually think he could fix Social Security?
Originally posted by Seekerof
Originally posted by Kidfinger
Bush is using logical falacies to promote a plan that does nothing more than make his 'investors' rich. Besides, Bush couldnt fix a broken model even if it was a snap together model. Why in the hell does anyone actually think he could fix Social Security?
Really?
Would those be the same fallacies that Clinton and Gore spoke of?
Those same people who live from paycheck to paycheck and work 2-3 jobs.
you can simply keep doing what your doing now [blowing it off/passing the buck] and let your kids or grandkids worry about it. You think the trillions that are being suggestively deemed required now are 'outrageous', just wait, cause for your kids or grandkids, the price tag will be far, far more.
Btw, the Democrat's are suggesting exactly what to "fix" Social Security? Nada.
I'm sure of one thing though, when, and it will, this issue is brought up again in 2008+ by a Democrat, you'll be "onboard" then, won't ya?
seekerof
[edit on 30-4-2005 by Seekerof]
Originally posted by Seekerof
I guess that leaves my children and grandchildren the ones holding the bag and paying the price for a future "fix" or reform, huh?
Originally posted by TxSecret
I really don't like bush very much but now that hes trying to ditch social security. (Or really just open it up for all his industrie/stock market crony friends) I'm really ticked off. Hasnt' this man done enough damage? One question you guys really need ask yourselves. WE ALREADY have private investment options.. Why privatize social security? OH, it's going bankrupt.. (oh PUHLEEZE)
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
Originally posted by TxSecret
I really don't like bush very much but now that hes trying to ditch social security. (Or really just open it up for all his industrie/stock market crony friends) I'm really ticked off. Hasnt' this man done enough damage? One question you guys really need ask yourselves. WE ALREADY have private investment options.. Why privatize social security? OH, it's going bankrupt.. (oh PUHLEEZE)
Exactly! He's trying to open it up so the new middle man (his cronies) will profit. It's as simple as that. Currently, there is NO middleman. It is pure T BU#! DO NOT FALL FOR IT, America!
Originally posted by Carseller4
The only thing simple in all this is Democrats don't want people to have power over THEIR money. Under this plan If you don't want to invest in the market, you don't have to. Once again...simple.
Originally posted by Kidfinger
Originally posted by Carseller4
The only thing simple in all this is Democrats don't want people to have power over THEIR money. Under this plan If you don't want to invest in the market, you don't have to. Once again...simple.
Better read the plan agian carseller. Bush wants to keep taking money out of your check and put it in another fund. Money will still be withheld from your income. You will just be able to choose one or more of a few companies that all happen to be contributors to the administration. Can anyone say conflict of intrest?
Wrong! If you choose not to participate, nothing will change from the current system.